Sentences with phrase «much about science»

Roberts credits those on the list with helping him learn «much about science» or having «encouraged, supported and advised» him.

It illustrates the battle was for the minds of the people, complicated by the fact that they, like Littlemore, «are not much about science».

I don't think the current crew of White House advisers care much about the science.

by «establishment» you mean the «consensus» guess you lost your «establishment» cred when you disagreed I am learning so much about science:)

The overriding theme of what came into clearer focus as a result of «climategate» is that disagreements about climate change are not so much about the science, but rather about a clash of underlying values, ideas (e.g. related to risk perception) and ideals.

Don't know much about science, do you?

I'd guess 70 years ago, outside people didn't care so much about science and if they did, they didn't stick with it.

Again, I no longer care much about the science.

Newton's science cum religion continues to be meat for philosophers, historians and sociologists of science; it made no contribution to religion or to religious philosophy, the most important of which doesn't care much about science.

And when you have people who don't know much about science standing in denial of it and rising to power, that is a recipe for the complete dismantling of our informed democracy.»

And, while I don't know much about science, I do know a lot about fundraising and people's affinity for their dogs and for animals, and that is where I am going to start.»

What they're learning, students say, is as much about science and writing as self - direction and a love of learning.

Politicians talk about issues they think will sway voters, a tenet that explains why U.S. presidential candidates never say much about science, research, and innovation on the campaign trail.

It's a different business model than the usual academic one, but because Hood learned as much about science from the telephone company and a geology camp as he did in school, he knows that progress is not the province of academia alone.

And here are the answers to the questions we asked last week, which were taken from the quiz at the Edinburgh Science Festival aiming to find out whether New Scientists's journalists know as much about science as University of Edinburgh academics.

No one has ever complained that U.S. presidential candidates talk too much about science, and this year has been no exception.

Skop's parents didn't know much about science, she says, but adds: «They knew that if I got a work study in a science lab, it would lead to something.»

Sadly I don't know too much about the science behind it but the cooling down process really does help them to set.

I don't think you know much about science, biology in particular.

You don't know much about science then do you?

I think it's a clever trick to make people (young people generally) who don't know much about science to think you have to be on one «side» or the other (God's side or Satan's side?)

Plus, he adds, Pritchard knows as much about the science as anyone.

You don't even need to know much about the science behind hydroponics to bring the magic of growing delicious plants into your own home.

Gross says focusing on video games was as much about the science of tracking and collecting information about patients» vision, as it is about the psychology in having a testing format that appeals to a wide range of ages and cognitive abilities — from children through elderly — regardless of reading or language skills.

Not exact matches

So thinking of a particular shift within the system as «anti-capitalist» makes about as much sense as thinking that the discrediting of a particular scientist or the fall of a particular scientific theory amounts to the downfall of science, as a whole.

«At a small company,» she says, «it's so much more about the science, and that's so much more satisfying to me.»

Jeffrey Pfeffer proclaims in this new book that «much of the oft - repeated conventional wisdom about leadership is based more on hope than reality, on wishes rather than data, on beliefs instead of science.»

Not only is your worst employee probably costing the company twice as much as a star employee is earning it, according to science, but that jerk is almost certainly making everyone else miserable along the way (according to just about everyone who has ever had to endure one).

(Interestingly, other science shows something similar about stress — too little can be as problematic as too much.

«We now know that young people who are going into the office for the first time are making decisions about who they work for not based on how much they're getting paid, but on the space design,» ASID president Randy Fiser told members of the design community at the recent Science of Design Conference at Liberty Science Center in New Jersey.

Rona and I talk about the science of gratitude, and why consciously practicing gratitude can boost our happiness so much.

We don't know much about the author other than he appears to have no professional financial background or qualifications, is well - qualified in computer science and claims experience in data science and simulation.

The first is just the observation that I bought what amounts to a 1.5 million dollar laptop screen with bitcoin back when it was a newfangled science project, much like the million dollar pizzas one reads about on the web.

This is what I love so much about storytelling, especially fantasy and science fiction: When the ordinary is depicted in an unfamiliar world, the contrast helps it stand out, helps us grasp it and learn to value it again.

But you should at least be honest and know that one who believes in the forensic science of origins of life has to have as much faith in the person asserting the theory as one has to have believing God was the witness to the event and told man kind how the world came about in simplistic terms.

The Discovery Channel long ago stopped caring about naive notions like «science,» «reasonable programming» and «discovery,» and has instead embraced a much more noble venture: making Shark Week as insane...

Through the aid of modern science we have learned so much about our physical and animal environment that we can destroy and kill with tremendous efficiency.

We know much more than we did about the origins of science; we know vastly more about nature.

The Holy Quran is all about giving simplified examples for the brains of that time, and addressed to illiterate Nomadic Beduins of the dry Arabian desert to understand and they have managed to do understand it and achieved miraculously for centuries in creating a multinational Islamic communities that has contributed so much to today's knowledge and science.

Though much of today's science is applied science — the: discovery of new processes and the making of new products to satisfy human wants — it all rests on the desire to find out with certainty what can be known about the world of nature.

«Testifies to»: there is a troublesome ambiguity about the logic of this relationship, an ambiguity that pervades much of the recent literature on science and religion.

Science may tell us much that the biblical writers did not know about the processes by which God continually fashions an unfinished world, but it can not go beyond the great truth stated in Genesis 1:1, «In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.»

You can learn about as much science from the quran as you can physics from «Horton Hears a Hoo»... now your sure that nest can fit an elephant?

My own suggestion is simply that we recognize the truth in much of what is said in these definitions and what is known about ourselves through the various sciences of our day, but that we refuse to confine our self - understanding to any one of them.

This is why the NRA and Republicans need evangelicals on their side — they need people who have been conditioned to not think too much about things, who think science books are bad.

In light of this fourfold division, it appears that the current disputes about Darwin and design are at bottom not so much conflicts between science and religion as disagreements about whether there is room for only one level — not a plurality of levels — on which to understand the story of life.

Much has been written about science and religion in general, but little has appeared to help scientists find Christian meaning in their jobs as scientists.

A view held by many contemporary metaphysicians is that the problem of induction, so much discussed by philosophers of science, arises only because of mistaken metaphysical views; in particular views (deriving from Hume) about the nature of the causal relation and / or about the internal relations among different entities.1 Contrary to this view, I will try...

As Cosmos continues to turn heads and give this country a (much needed) renewed interest in science, the old debate about science and religion has come back to the forefront...

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result