It changed so
much about my government outreach work and my practice of law.
Instead of worrying so
much about the government, let's just concentrate in keeping our eyes in God and we will see the Glory of His name.
Sustainable chocolate is as
much about governments creating an enabling policy environment and enforcing legislation, NGOs creating awareness and consumers making sustainable choices, as it is about industry commitment and investment.
Since you seem to know so
much about government, why do you enlighten the rest of us about EXACTLY what the duties of appointments office are these days?
Now I understand why people whinge so
much about the government!
When I was 16, I am ashamed to say, I did not know
much about the government or the cost of living.
Not exact matches
But if that is too
much power for
governments to yield, then a neutral body could at least identify threats and offer neutral advice on what to do
about them.
If the
government is set on making taxes fairer, it needs to be
much clearer
about what it means
Analysts said they weren't reading too
much into what they described as a «backward - looking indicator» and were hopeful
about the economic prospects given an upturn in recent indicators such as confidence and machinery orders, not to mention efforts by Japan's new
government to revive growth.
And one would guess that so
much direct experience of Putin and Sechin will leave very little room for illusions
about the nature of Russia's
government, how
much it resents American pre-eminence, and how far it will go to undermine it.
The interest rate on 10 - year bonds was 1.79 % at the end of 2014 —
about half as
much as the federal
government had to offer to get investors to buy its debt a decade ago.
There has been
much debate
about how blockchain could solve this problem, but a recent Newsweek report detailing the example of a home title being issued on the Ethereum blockchain showed a solution: It's only a matter of time, the article said, before
government agencies start embracing blockchain as a valid alternative to existing title processes.
The federal
government's recent decision to block the takeover of Potash Corp. by Australian mining company BHP Billiton has sparked
much debate
about which types of Canadian industries should be protected from foreign buyers.
Way back in the winter of 2014, when he was sketching the broad strokes of his agenda as the new leader of the then third - place Liberals, Trudeau spoke in Montréal
about how pro-free market economic orthodoxy, put into policy by successive
governments over the past few decades, was favouring the rich too
much.
It was
about what the
government's size should be, how
much deficits matter in tough economic times, and
about looking good to the respective constituencies.
They also need to ask themselves hard questions
about their
government's fiscal policy, including why their country continues to spend so
much money on defence.
The agreement is expected to save Ontario's electricity system
about $ 70 million in costs over the seven years, but the two
government's cited «commercial sensitivities» for refusing to say how
much Ontario will pay for the electricity.
The
government keeps gushing
about how
much tax revenue they're collecting.
Foreign visitors to the Reserve Bank over the years have tended to raise questions
about household debt
much more frequently than they have raised questions
about government debt.
And instead of offering condolences, he reminded Puerto Rico
about how
much money it was costing the federal
government to respond to the crisis.
Had he mined and refined his insight
about outsourcing, he might have realized how
much America's post-1970 political decay owes to the ongoing explosion in what public administration scholar Donald Kettl has termed «
government by proxy.»
The fallout from the story concerning Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, the misuse of personal data and how
much Facebook knew
about all this, has quickly made its way into the halls of
government — and with it Facebook's CEO Mark Zuckerberg is getting a lot of invitations in his inbox.
This is the same criticism made in Stephen Gordon's comments
about attributing all job growth over the past eight years to the Conservative
government:
Much of this growth would have happened under most alternative policy scenarios.
I remember meetings as far back as 2008, for example involving senior United States or European
government officials looking to be debriefed on the Chinese economy, in which the foreign (and some Chinese) analysts present spoke jauntily
about the great success of China's growth policies and the brilliant future ahead, while many of the Chinese economists present were
much more cautious and even gloomy as they discussed the sheer intractability of China's economic distortions.
Assuming that the total amount of bad debt in the banking system exceeds total bank capital — something which is almost certainly true — the conversion of debt which can not be serviced into an equity position that is unlikely to generate
much more (and in an economic downturn, which is when we are most concerned
about the debt burden, we can assume that the decline in value of these equity positions will be highly correlated) leaves the net indebtedness of the banking system unchanged, and so the contingent liabilities of the
government are unchanged even as reported debt in the system declines.
Despite all their boasting
about being good fiscal managers and the evils of accumulating debt, the Conservative
government doesn't seem to really care that
much about reducing debt.
«There are certainly things that are illegal content, so that is more of an area where talking
about regulations could make sense, but so
much of what comes up in general discussion
about this is out of reach of
government action from the get - go.»
Capital controls have historically been as
much about preventing foreigners from buying local
government bonds as it has been
about preventing destabilizing bouts of flight capital, and living in China, where an aggressive demand for the privileges of reserve currency status coincide with equally aggressive policies that prevent the RMB from achieving reserve currency status (and that transfer ever more of the «benefits» to the US) made clear the huge gap in rhetoric and practice.
You can say the same
about Bitcoin and pretty
much any sovereign
government on Earth.
Kenneth G. Langone, the co-founder of Home Depot and former director of the New York Stock Exchange, helped fund Maurice R. Greenberg's lawsuit against the United States
government over the bankruptcy of the American International Group, which was viewed as being as
much as
about money as
about principle.
The Opposition can complain
about it, but it has no power to make the
government listen,
much less change its mind on anything.
On the other hand, banks, pension funds, and others don't have
much choice
about government bonds.
I believe Susan was making a statement
about the Wildrose party that they seem to say that pretty
much the
government should get out of the way of the oil companies and let them do whatever they want and we should be grateful when they do something nice for Alberta.
Prosecutors said in an indictment that Worrall tipped Blaszczak
about upcoming decisions from CMS, which decides how
much government insurance programs will reimburse healthcare companies.
And so for example, if you look at U.S.
government debt, which is the one almost everyone always talks
about, most people aren't sitting there worrying
about how
much debt does Amazon have, when you look at
government debt, interest payments on
government debt as a percent of GDP or as a percent of tax revenue, currently because interest rates are relatively low, are very low, are running half, literally half of what they were in the second half of the»80s and the first half of the»90s.
It also means that there is no
government or central entity to make discretionary decisions
about how
much currency to create or attempt to defend it through monetary policy actions.3
The February 2018 budget is expected to reveal
much about the taxation framework needed to fund the
government's vision for British Columbia.
Trump can't do
much about the $ 75 billion the
government owes Wall Street creditors on his own; it's possible that the federal
government could pay off some of it, but a massive bailout won't go over well in Congress.
«There's no question that Canadian corporate buyers — and I'd actually say
government buyers in particular — need to become
much more aggressive
about trying new things and being more willing to try Canadian products and services earlier on in their cycle,» he said.
On the flip side, there have been questions
about the ability of FinTech companies to penetrate an industry where customers are wary of new incumbents where
government oversight is not
much.
Opinion: He can start by being transparent
about how
much high - income Canadians actually pay in taxes and receive in
government transfers
I'm not a Libertarian but even I understand the arguments and complaints
about giving too
much power to a
government, no matter what
government that may be.
Mr. Harper did not have
much to say
about this, except to remind everyone that his
government had cut the GST and then to read a list of various industry associations who had expressed favourable sentiments
about the most recent budget.
There are very few real threats that
governments can do
much about.
When in the 1970s there began to be
much discussion
about «mediating structures» and voluntarism, when Ronald Reagan urged us to rely on
government less and on ourselves more, when George Bush talked
about a «thousand points of light,» those of a statist mind - set groused that it was all a scheme to cut back on
government social services.
I haven't had
much to say
about the partial
government shutdown / debt ceiling squabble because I find it simultaneously confusing, irritating, and boring.
In fact I bet you're one of those hypocrite teabagger trolls who are happy to have the
government pave their roads, provide public schools for their kids, provide a mortgage credit, etc. then whine
about all those fictional people getting so
much for free.
If such an institution wishes to be offensively bloody minded, there isn't» or, at least, there shouldn't be»
much that an American
government can do
about it.
It will have been noted that in its windy statement
about RE in the English baccalaureate, the CES doesn't point to RE as being a way in to religious faith: that wouldn't be of
much interest to the
government, of course, but it ought to be for Catholics.
I guess I feel the same way
about a liberal agenda that say that to get out of debt we have to spend more, or that my tax dollars have to pay for something I think is morally wrong (Obamacare sets up a fund to pay for late term abortions) or a
government that confiscates kids lunches, or tells me how
much soda I can drink, or uses my tax money to choose winners and losers (mostly losers but Obma doners) in energy production that produces no energy yet we are sitting on more coal and oil than any other nation on the planet.