Sentences with phrase «much about the positions»

My draft script: Given the chance, I take whichever (non-DI) high quality defender falls to me (e.g., Landry, Smith, Jackson, James) and don't worry too much about the position.

Ramsey - Well I do nt know much about his position and attitude.But he seems to have modelled his game against good strikers.

After knowing why do babies sleep with their butts in the air, you can see that there is no need to worry too much about this position, right?

Choosing a career outside of academia is daunting, and not many academic advisers know much about the positions that exist or how to be competitive for them, so I guess I'm mostly thankful for postgraduates in nonacademic positions for sharing their knowledge!

Have you thought much about the positions in which you sleep?

The 13D filed 4 October doesn't disclose much about the position, but the NYTimes has a great REUTERS BREAKINGVIEWS article Fortune's Links discussing the position:

The 13D filed 4 October doesn't disclose much about the position, but the...

You can only marvel how the ancient Mayans knew so much about the position of the stars, without the use of any metals.

Given that hunting (and art collecting) was an aristocratic privilege, these paintings spoke as much about position and prerogative as they did about nature.

An application is a signed legal document, where your signature certifies that you have provided a full and accurate employment history.Also, I wouldn't worry too much about this position — it was almost three years ago and most of us have had jobs that didn't work out.

Ask clarifying questions with the aim of knowing as much about the position as the recruiter does.

The recruiter will then get to know as much about the position as they can, so create a profile of the person needed to fill that role.

Not exact matches

Needless to say, you should do as much research as you can about the company and the position.

Sometimes the allure of a new position, a step up in title or pay, or just a really cool career - opportunity blinds us a bit to other things about the company that we might not like as much.

The next time you see this casual acquaintance, start talking about how much you love your current position.

Next week in this series we will talk about how to create a personal brand positioning statement to make this all much more specific to you.

Much has been written about why more women aren't awarded positions of power, and many proposed solutions have been subject to great debate.

Specifically, we find that newcomers are in a unique position when it comes to observing ingratiation, and they are much more likely to interpret it as a positive signal about the supervisor.

«Every once in a while you start to go into your fetal position and be a little worried about what the impact to your business is going to be, but then something happens that make you realize that you have a moral imperative — that there is something much larger,» he said.

Executives need to look carefully into the changes that are just starting to emerge and learn as much as they can about how new technologies affect their core value proposition, their competitive positioning, and their relationships with stakeholders.

Without taking the time to think carefully about where your notions of achievement and purpose come from and what success means to you, you're in a terrible position to decide if this week's hot «how to be successful» advice applies to you or only to someone who thinks the point of life is something you actually don't value much at all.

We typically think about people coming from business to occupy positions in the administration that have a particular oversight or much more direct daily interaction with the business community itself.

So it seems to me the risk of the economy hitting the recession when monetary policy is not in a position to respond are much greater than they have been previously and therefore, we need to be very cautious about doing anything that would increase those risks.

Is he trading too big of a position and is constantly worried about losing too much money?

Assuming that the total amount of bad debt in the banking system exceeds total bank capital — something which is almost certainly true — the conversion of debt which can not be serviced into an equity position that is unlikely to generate much more (and in an economic downturn, which is when we are most concerned about the debt burden, we can assume that the decline in value of these equity positions will be highly correlated) leaves the net indebtedness of the banking system unchanged, and so the contingent liabilities of the government are unchanged even as reported debt in the system declines.

Earnings season is about to get underway, too, which is more than likely going to show a fourth straight quarterly decline in profits — and if firms aren't seeing bottom line leverage, they may be slow to dole out new positions, or much in the way of payroll hikes.

I'm a conservative Republican out of Michigan (and working to better understand that conservative position) and would want to know as much as possible about who or what moves or influences my elected or unelected leaders to make the decisions they make.

You can rely on them to provide you solid and sizable income without much worry about their market position.

Aligning the offers you use in your lead nurturing campaigns and in the CTAs on your website with a prospect's likely position in the sales cycle will not only help to better qualify a lead, but it may also shorten the sales cycle, as a prospect will be much closer to a purchasing decision with a ton of knowledge about your business before he / she even talks to a sales person.

Overall, Strategic Total Return presently holds about 14 % of assets in precious metals shares - still a constructive position in light of continued favorable conditions, but restrained enough to accept the possibility of short - term volatility without much worry.

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

Also, since you are clearly not a member of the Jewish community I do believe I am in a much better position to talk about the negative feelings of Jews towards to Mormons of Salt Lake than you.

But you should also note that much of the history you study is about major religions that rose to positions of power over the people.

But however tempting such a position might appear, however weary we are before the onslaught of irreconcilable theological claims, we ought to be cautious about answering Paul's warning against being «tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine» with a refusal to believe much of anything.

He moved beyond a recognition of the validity of much of Bultmann's position, to argue that since something can be known about the historical Jesus, we must concern ourselves with working it Out, if we do not wish ultimately to find ourselves committed to a mythological Lord.

Serious inquiry supports civility in public life, inquisition damages it, and whatever reservations some might have about his positions on particular issues, these essays show Michnik to be very much a mainstay of that civility.

Furthermore, how much of the recent scandal would the Church have avoided had bishops and priests in positions of authority in the 70's and 80's been better educated about psychology?

only reason y i say this is because of Santification, once we give our life to the Lord, we streight way (so to speak) begin the process of Santification, this is Christ making us like him, and this Is SUFFERING It does nt happen over night, but for the duration of our time here, as you have said, its sort of like sin being done unto us, and we are handleing it just like Christ did, (with Love) of coarse with the help of the Holy Spirit, This Does NOT feel Good At ALL since our soulful flesh is Corrupt, (but our spirit is saved) This is were your trails and tribulation, your own desire, and All play apart, Now Moment by Moment we choose by our own will, And Jesus helps in these times, as he was tempeted, but without sin, The devil can do nothing but try and decieve the Christian into thinking that he has to work for his salvation as you have said, this thing here is about your Inheritance In Christ, Its gonna be some show nought broke christian in Heaven, because their trying to set of for themseleve trasure on earth, and their is going to be weeping and gnat of teeth, but it wont be, because of their going to Hell, It will be cause they miss out on what they could have had, and it is Devistation, cause they waste so much time, and they wont be able to attend the wedding, supper of the lamb, they wont be, getting the position over city, galacy, ectt... just check it out some of the points i have made, God Bless you!

At least one of them, that suggested by Tillich, depends to a considerable degree upon the Tillichian «system» in which there is much talk about «existential» and «essential» manhood, not to mention the more general philosophical position which he adopts with its talk about «the ground of being», «the power of being», and «the new being in Christ» — the last of these constituting in fact what «restitution» is all about.

Likewise, the Presbyterian Church (USA)'s changes to its policy took place over a much longer time than Azumah names, involved persons holding many positions left undescribed, and came about not because the denomination chose to ignore the Scriptures but because over time, many of us became convinced that there are theologically and historically faithful ways of reading the Scriptures that find space for contemporary understandings of homosexuality.

Another kind of position about the ministry, which now seems likely to be adopted to a certain extent by the Roman Catholic Church, is to create a group of subministers, who are permitted to perform nearly (but not quite) all the functions of the priest, but who will be trained much more quickly.

I do not understand why Protestant theologians [including Barth] are so afraid of the New Testament position when the New Testament teaches only, this much about the «interim condition»: (1) that it exists, (2) that it already signifies union with Christ [this because of the Holy Spirit]-RRB-.

Frequently, the argument wasn't as much about theology, as it was about pride, power, and politics, as each person sought a place of higher prominence or position within the church.

Both of them are now believers, which is their choice as adults, but they fully understand my position on religions and we sometimes have some wonderful discussions on the subject, but I usually just get them confused because I know so much more about the Christian faith than they do because I have studied it from a secular point of view.

The study also included an effort to determine how much agreement exists between individual members» views and the official theological positions of the church, first by interviewing theologians to determine what the official positions were, then by surveying pastors to see if these positions were taught, and finally by surveying members about their own beliefs.

This position helps to uncover one aspect of the confusion in much popular language about love which treats it as a universal experience which is merely illustrated in particular cases.

I believe that by looking at what the authors of Scripture say about Scripture, we can arrive a much better position — one where we maintain the accuracy and authority of Scripture, but in such a way that Scripture is not set up as a sacred idol.

Paradoxically, the first creates an atmosphere of fear — if someone challenges my doctrine, they're challenging my perceived position with God — my sense of security; while the second creates a state of not caring so much about others individual beliefs as just being real with God.

The question was «science can explain» not «science can explain everything» 1) We will never know the position of every bit of matter so knowing everything is not possible — the current theories match observations well enough for the answer to be yes 2) Again knowing everything about every individual step in the creation of life is not possible but current theories match... 3) here do know pretty much everything.

All the pope essentially said was «We're still going to maintain our position on these issues, but since they're unpopular we're not going to talk about them as much.»