Not exact matches
You can click the previous link to learn why indicators are a waste of time; I've discussed this a lot so I won't get into it
much here except to say that if you want to truly simplify your trading you need to learn how to trade off of pure price
action.
I have written about that topic frequently
here, and didn't expect
much action.
It would be otiose to give examples: a distant thunder is in the past as
much as a distant star; but no matter how far in time - space a star or galaxy is, it is always faintly immanent in my
Here - Now even when its
action is below the threshold of human perception; its
action can be made visible by a combination of lenses or a prolonged photographic exposure.
Obama is a Christian and his
actions as president are very
much in line with the teaching of the new testament, yet I couldn't dare say that at my Evangelical church where the ACA has literally saved the life of our pastors child but
here is so
much hate for Obama it's down right scary.
The role of the divine is
much pondered» the furiously indignant Cain gets no more explanation for why his sacrifice was rejected
here than he did in Genesis» but the
actions are all committed by humans.
Here «incarnation» does not refer so
much to the actualization as to the embodiment of divine aims in the lives of people, whereby the very abstract aims conceptually entertained in God's primordial experience are transformed into concrete possibilities or effective lures for our
action and self - understanding.
It will not be so
much a source of information about what
here and now is the only correct and legitimate course of
action.
They live and breathe dialog and mutual respect toward other ideas, they come first (not in an evil way... they simply watch out for their own authentic self first), storms call for individualism and thoughtfulness, and they have a need for dialog that may lead to no
action - right - now (the sense of urgency is
much less
here on the hilltop).
But it seems like (yes, I'm putting a lot of weight on «seems» because I want to give everyone
here as
much slack as possible) you're sidestepping real and tangible efforts made to rehabilitate Paterno's reputation, as well as the
actions taken by PSU re: McQueary.
United have not lost in EPL
action since October and can you really see Mourinho allowing Wenger to get the better of him
here when the Frenchman is under so
much pressure?
'' Catch up on the second day of IAAF World Indoor Championships
action with our round - up report
here and then see the next edition of AW magazine, out March 24, for
much more
Slowly but surely, in an hour
here and an hour there, those studio boxes (some packed up two years ago) are being opened and sorted and placed in position ready for
action (and there is so
much «making» to be done!).
The emphasis
here is that there are «dangers of expecting too
much from any sort of political
action.»
Fortunately Eugenic associations
here and abroad have done
much to clear away the popular prejudices inevitably encountered in such educational work and to prepare the ground for legislative
action.»
We spend so
much time worrying about what may or may not happen that we forget to take
action right
here, right now, and create what will actually be.
When you get tired of all your friends bragging about how
much action they're getting, remember, we're
here to help you do the same!!»
I am a huge fan of the original Prince of Persia trilogy, and when I heard about this game I was a little worried that they would change to
much of what made the original games great, and I was right, the gameplay has been completely destroyed, platforming is awkward do to too may
actions being mapped to the same buttons, combat is tedious and unenjoyable, it's EXTREMELY repetitive, having to search around for light seeds just to advance the plot is stupid, and do to the fact that you can't really die the whole game just feels like trial and error, and the new Prince character is completely unlikeable, while they messed up most of the game it's got some good things going for it, the voice acting is solid, the graphics are beautiful, and the ending does have interested in seeing where the story goes from
here, but I'm not sure if I want to pick up the next game they come out with, this was a huge disappointment and isn't worthy to bear the Prince of Persia name.
As
much as you may want to paint Synder as a horrible director we aren't talking Michael Bay
action here.
Though Tony Gilroy, who shared writing credit on all three previous Bourne films and directed the excellent Michael Clayton 82 (and
much less excellent Duplicity 69), handles both writing and directing duties
here, critics found that Legacy added little in the way of originality, while Renner proved a less captivating
action star than Damon.
The cast is what really rocks
here with a classic list of 80's
action stars... Sheen, Biehn, Paxton and Rossovich, can't get
much better than that right.
Except for a few individual lines and sight gags, a brilliantly over-the-top
action - comedy sequence near the midsection, and some characteristically sharp performances (including the one by Brolin, who imbues what might've otherwise been a granite - jawed killer meathead with recognizable humanity) there's not
much to fondly recall
here.
The other problem is there is actually too
much needless violence and blood, nothing wrong with a bit of violence and blood, but
here it just feels excessive and unnecessary, it doesn't actually add anything to the
action.
There are so many nice people
here, but it does so
much harm in the world... So to what degree is this country culpable for its
actions?
Their battle takes place inside Budd's trailer home, which is pretty
much demolished in the process, and provides a contrast to the elegant nightclub setting of the fight with O - Ren Ishii; it ends in a squishy way that would be unsettling in another kind of movie, but
here all the
action is so ironically heightened that we may cringe and laugh at the same time.
Here the jokes,
action and characters are all fun and the dilemmas are overcome quite easily, but in the end, we shouldn't expect
much more from a children's film.
There are a lot of character names flying about
here, a lot of seemingly pointless stuff, aimless boring dialog and not
much action believe it or not.
When put together (as
here), they are overextended and too long by half, with many a dull stretch before the famous wirework
action sequences finally kick in — although perhaps this will not prove too
much of a challenge for the modern viewer who is a fan of, say, 2015's The Hateful Eight (with its similarly protracted pace and duration).
For the most part, though, Kojima and his team got so
much right in their first attempt at tactical stealth
action that many of the ideas that debuted
here remain intrinsic parts of the series.
Hmmm a cross breed
here with a mix of historical fact, or what we know, blended with your typical over the top
action sillyness
much like «Prince of Thieves».
Weber (Annabelle & Bear) makes smart choices
here, not least of which is to frame A Girl Like Her as a faux documentary, injecting a
much - needed ironic distance between the
action and the viewer.
I'm a fan of Guy Ritchie's stop -
action style, especially the humor in his films... but you won't find
much humor
here.
I'll admit I don't know too
much about this category, but
action films seem to do well
here (recent winners include The Dark Knight, The Bourne Ultimatum and The Matrix) and the only one with any Oscar hope this year is Inception.
There are a few moments
here and there in fight sequences where the camera shakes a bit but it's
much more toned down allowing you to see all the
action happening.
Where Peter Berg's Patriot's Day took the
action movie tack, focussing on law enforcement and an admittedly ridiculous compound character played by Mark Wahlberg,
here the focus is very
much on a single individual's own response to the events and how they both physically and spiritually shaped him afterward.
When a heroine is as invincible and indestructible as the one portrayed
here and kills off hordes of faceless henchmen without even so
much as breaking a sweat, the
action becomes simply repetitive and pointless.
With so
much that feels fresh in «Dredd» it was disappointing to see one of the
action genre's biggest tropes repeated
here.
Considering the incoherent shambles he made out of his James Bond movie, «Quantum of Solace,» Forster handles the large - scale
action here with considerable aplomb and
much striking imagery, enhanced by the seamless mix of choreography, prosthetics and CG that bring the herking, jerking zombies to «life.»
He looks old
here, made up with a gray beard and wizard robes, aside from his introductory scenes, he doesn't really get time or space to develop his Taoist Gandalf character, nor does he have
much opportunity to show off his fighting skills, given the supernatural nature of the
action (Lam Ching - ying gets such a chance in a too - small cameo role as «The Purple Taoist»).
It's a shame because there's so
much wasted
here: A unique setting and world of «feuding», solid performances from Bosworth and Franco and how values influence
actions.
There's no high concept
here or need for a third act twist, it's just a gritty, balls to the wall
action thriller very
much in the vein of the sort of revenge themed films of the 70's.
As
much as people on
here want Nintendo to have better online capability, for online multiplayer
action, how can they in turn shun VR and deem it divisive is kind of strange to me.
The best setpiece in «Winter Soldier,» Cap taking out a bunch of would - be assassins in an elevator, had a frenzied smallness that was
much more exciting than watching helicarriers crash and monuments crumble; it seems to have inspired the better
action scenes
here — not just a stairwell punch-fest that finds Bucky swinging from a torn - up stretch of railing like Tarzan on a vine, but in a bigger, louder, wilder clash between Avengers (including emergency ringers Spider - Man, Ant - Man and Black Panther) on an airport runway.
K - 19: The Widomaker is a good
action film,
much overlooked
here in the United States, probably because we aren't used to watching films with Russian heroes, and are especially skeptical with American and British actors portraying them.
Don't get me wrong,
action sequences
here are amazingly choreographed and I can't imagine how intricate the process of getting some of the stuff they did on screen — all the way from storyboarding to post-production — but it's clear that Jackson's put too
much time into these
action beats and not nearly enough into the hobbit, dwarves, wizards, and elves in them.
Not
much action is happening
here until the ending sequence.
It might be a little unfair to label each Neeson
action film «Taken on a [insert place
here]» but if you look at the trailers, or have seen the movies, that's what they pretty
much are.
The
action is okay, and the moral quandary of how far someone will go to protect their family (even if they have moved on) keeps things interesting, but as good and charismatic as Johnson is, there's just not
much here to get excited about.
The
action certainly outweighs the comedy
here, but the film does value a sense of humor and we never doubt that Cruise and his less widely known co-stars are having just as
much fun as Clooney, Pitt, Damon, and company did.
Thankfully, there are few punch - ups
here, most of the
action being either car chases or skiing sequences, which are
much more exciting.
If, however, you didn't enjoy the previous
action all that
much, you're not going to have a ball
here either.