REPLY: Ok everybody, lets all settle down a bit, we are getting too
much ad hom and too far offtopic on both sides — Anthony
Not exact matches
I love a quick
ad -
hom challenge to my scientific manhood as
much as the next guy.
My general impression is that RC is
much more hard - nosed about obscenities,
ad homs and OT comments.
Citing a seven year old citation of what was then a seven year old citation of something to irrelevant to the paper in question, then making insupportable assertions about inevitability (which, ironic, as complex dynamical systems pretty
much argue against the precept of predetermination), and ending with an implied causal relationship from the symptoms of Forcings to the Forcings themselves, served with a dollop of
ad hom..
I do find
much to dislike with the
ad homs.
I am, however,
much less concerned that this thread has been hijacked by some of Judith's more outspoken denizens who seem to enjoy the cut and thrust of the
ad homs.
It becomes less interesting if it slips into «
ad hom» attacks or censorship of «inconvenient» observations, but Bart has kept this site pretty
much clear of that, to his credit.
If you are in too
much of a hurry to troll away that you fail to read the article, which contains more than adequate justification for Judiths claims (which are not
ad hom in any way — dishonesty is dishonesty,
ad hominum doesn't come into it), how about leave the discussion to us grownups