Sentences with phrase «much agree about»

I so very much agree about the backyard garden being a learning process.

These arguments are about the tails of a distribution — say 10 % (max) of the distribution for S — we pretty much all agree about the first 90 % of it.

I very much agree about few ideas are so unique no one has ever heard of them.

While Neil hasn't seen The Princess and the Frog, he and Kevin pretty much agree about the other new releases like Invictus (though Kevin berates Neil for taking so much time to examing The Lovely Bones and later rages about Peter Jackson's obnoxious cameo).

Not exact matches

With the latter, you're prone to agree that «everyone is a certain kind of person and there is not much they can really change about that.»

A new survey finds parents feel bad about staring at their phones too much — and their children agree

Scientists agree on this much, but Orton said they have «too many theories» about the migration of Uranus and Neptune, which came next.

And pretty much everyone agrees that celebrating to the things that are actually, currently good in your life is awesome for achievement and mental health (being kind to yourself about past failures also seems like a good idea).

Once you know much more about them, you can create a «pact» where you work together to agree what success looks like so that you can work together toward achieving it.

If there's one thing everyone seems to agree on about Comcast's new wireless service, it's that the cable giant is playing it safe, and the four major carriers don't have much to worry about.

But you pretty much sign your life away, agreeing to work whenever and however long Disney wants — and you're happy about it.

Whatever your views of Ford, and whatever your views about the severity of his breach of the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, you pretty much have to agree that Ford demonstrated a disappointing lack of leadership ethics, here.

Even if you agree with him about how much investment will increase, the assumptions underlying his job numbers are misleading.

As economists, though, we can also agree that this is about much more than monetary policy.

But in a major shift away from the previous Saudi - led policy of maintaining production to squeeze high - cost US shale - oil producers, OPEC countries agreed to target a lower level of 32.5 — 33.0 million barrels a day, although there was some skepticism about the absence of details on which members would curb output and by how much, which were delayed until the next meeting in November.

Tiggy — I would agree that much of conservative Christianity in America sees lust as any sexual thoughts about anyone you are not married to.

So until we do, you cant blame people for thinking that either the moderate Muslim does nt care about the radicals that much... or they kinda agree wtih them.

I agree with so many in that I have never given much consideration to what a dying person wants to talk about.

I agree with you that we all learn much about love from our families, as imperfect as that may be.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

Not that I don't agree with you that much of the modern world has been brought about because of faith, even / especially religious faith.

Patriarchae, my point is that Pastor Jeffers» comments about Mormonism perfectly exemplifies the main problem with the hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds of Protestant denominations (most of whom can not agree on the time of day much less matters theological).

I agree that God didn't pursue Adam to smash his face in, never suggested that or alluded to it, but there is no confusion where sin leads and there is no doubt about the consequences off those who love their lives, they will lose it where as those that hate their lives will find it... So to conclude, Jesus and the father are not two different things, they are both the very same in as much as God desires all to be saved and has shown the way to salvation.

Freedom is much more about about allowing behavior that one does not agree with than behavior one does agree with.

I don't agree with Rachel much either but I think she was talking about people predisposed to be believers in the first place.

I'm not sure every run - of - the - mill Southern Baptist worries much about that particular «flaw» (if you agree with Carter), in the Catholic hierarchy.

matybigfro, I agree that there is much about the SGM / MH / EV stories that is reminiscent of the charismatic flavor of shepherding abuse.

There is much that Metz says about memory and narrative with which a process theologian can enthusiastically agree.

So, having said these things, I will still vote for President Obama not so much for the other issues I agree with him (immigration and especially economy), but because of the facts you Baptist Minister also mentioned about Bishop Romney (he was indeed a Mormon priest in Boston and a Mormon missionary in France).

for instance, i very much agree with her about how hard care - giving is, but not so much with her assertions about God in the article.

Let us agree that for two and a half millennia Buddhists have been right about this and about much else.

I volunteer at a homeless NPO and as much as I enjoyed the first part of the post, I do not agree with leaving bible verses and the implication of forgetting about sharing Jesus out completely... I understand the reasoning and that people have been hurt, but to leave Jesus out of the equation unless they ask doesn't sit well with me.

Unless someone is writing about how much they hate Gays and wish them to burn in Hell, you will never agree with anything anyone says.

«Thou doth protest too much» the person who gave me the news and I agreed about our mutual friend.

That is why we have so much confusion about «religion», the Devil is the author of confusion and he wants us all mixed up and at each others» throats just because we all don't agree or we all don't act like a Christian should act.

I wonder then why Mr. Nye is wasting so much oxygen complaining about the great «harm» the teaching of Creationism does to children... though I may not personally agree with the tenets of Creationism, I do believe in the right of parents to pass their personal religious beliefs on to their children - whether those beliefs are Christian, Hindu, Muslim, etc....

If somebody votes for a party that you don't agree with, you're free to argue about it as much as you like; everybody will have an argument but nobody feels aggrieved by it.

I agree that there is much that needs to be dialogued about regarding the realm of Christian music / worship songs and I applaud you for addressing the topic; but I think you'll get more meaningful dialogue with an atmosphere that is more respectful and less accusatory.

I agree with Basically, someone I don't know shoots someone I don't know 1000 miles away from where I live pretty much everyday, I see no reason to care about this case anymore than I do any of the others.

The upshot is the suppression of political debate about the common good, which is why thorough - going libertarians are such a destructive force in our political culture, perhaps as much so as contemporary liberals whose main vice is the serene smugness that assumes that all we have left is administration because everybody worth talking to already agrees with them about first principles.

Agreed; we spend too much time and effort worrying about obsessive compulsive religious activities than we do the education of our children.

Why do you talk about only what he didn't menage to do, or what was wrong in his pontificate?Yes, I agree there were many things that could have been resolved in better way, but he was only a human and as everybody could make mistakes.To me what is important in his pontificate is that he was a first pope who «opened «the church to people, who travelled a lot, met with people, went to synagogue, did much to abolish communism.Sure, he wasn't ideal, but for me the best pope so far.

James Q. Wilson agrees that much went radically wrong about then» as evident in divorce, crime, out - of - wedlock births, ineffective schools, and much else» but he thinks the reason is chiefly cultural.

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

President Obama and the Republicans did not agree on very much over the last two years, but on the question of what this election was all about there was not an inch of daylight between them — at least when the campaign began.

to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.

As someone who writes almost exclusively about race, I found much in Sarah E. Hinlicky's essay with which I agree.

Of course, this is not all that Christians believe, or even the major part of what Christians believe, about Jesus Christ; but for our purpose, it is enough now just to admit at least that much, to see here life given in love to the point of complete surrender of self, to agree that the ages witness that this is healthy life, this is wholeness, and then to turn to oneself and ask the very simple but very searching question, «How do I measure up to that standard?»

First of all, I firmly agree that the Gospel of Jesus should be central, but in contrast to much of the Christian Music (and most of the evangelical culture) of the 1980s, that doesn't mean that the Gospel can, or should, be reduced to a few basic convictions about Jesus.

I pretty much agreed with most of what you have said and i think that the sinners prayer has been misused as a get out of Jail free card.A couple of things that people miss is that God is in charge.As soon as you offer yourself to God and accept Jesus Chris the holy spirit has liberty to work on you.Because he loves us he will discipline us so that we do repent of our sins.The downside of living a walk like that you are a hypocrite until you admit your sinfulness the holy spirit can not help us because of our pride.The second part was you talking about disciplining the flesh personally you cant discipline that which is corrupt our hearts are deceitfully wicked we need new hearts no amount of effort on our part will transform our hearts that is the work of the holy spirit he changes our hearts so that we no longer desire to sin we would rather serve the Lord with all our hearts instead.brentnz