Sentences with phrase «much agrees with you on»

Jeremy, pretty much agree with you on this one.

Pretty much agreed with you on that one.

Jordan, you know I pretty much agree with you on many things but I don't necessarily agree we are talking the same thing here.

Not exact matches

Mostly it poses the question of what do you do with a country where we simply just can't get along — where we are at a political impasse so profound that we can't agree on simple questions, much less passing a budget?

Canadian CEOs agreed that the BP disaster will lead to much tougher regulation of the entire North American oil extraction industry, with a mean of 6 on the 7 - point agreement scale.

Corporations agree: «It makes so much sense that you would expect decisions like these to be made with your senior management, starting with your CEO,» says Tod MacKenzie, Aramark's head of public affairs, who also worked on animal welfare policies with Balk and HSUS at DineEquity, owner of the IHOP and Applebee's brands.

A settlement means that we're going to not chance it to the jury to make a decision, we agree to disagree on whether anyone did anything wrong but we're making a practical business decision, we're going to pay this much to be done with this case and not test the waters.

But he and Mr. Pandit could not agree on how much it was worth, with Citi asking $ 22.5 billion and Morgan Stanley offering $ 9.5 billion.

For my part, I'm much more inclined to agree with Dan Niles from Lehman Brothers, who has consistently been on the mark.

I will definitely agree with you that erring on the conservative side is much better than using starry - eyed numbers with little chance of real success.

I agree with much of what you are saying, however in some cases it is good to have Facebook likes as a social validation that can potentially increase conversion rates on your website.

It is hard to believe, for example, that Canada could not in the end find common ground with the US on some extension of patent protection for pharmaceuticals, since it was able to do so in the just - completed negotiations with the EU, or that an extension of the term of copyright protection from 50 to 70 years from the agreed baseline would have much if any real practical impact on Canada although it would be seen as a gain by the US given the heavy copyright portfolios of US entertainment companies, allowing them an additional period of time to exploit their copyrighted content.

i totally agree with Tip that don't focus so much on keyword planner, instead of that just Think like visitors, or what user will type or think while searching any topic.

I'm a huge saver (80 - 90 %) of every paycheck as an engineer but with this I can invest it as I see fit without regulations and not have any higher taxes to deal with later on (where I agree with you, taxes will be much higher in the future than it is now to address our spending problem... and more importantly our growing debt problem).

I had hope for the new Pope with his emphasis on helping the poor (the importance of social justice is one of best things the Catholic Church gave to me even if I don't agree with most of their stands:)-RRB- but I don't much will change their stories of embezzlement, telling the Nuns on the Bus to settle down and the history of hiding and transferring pedos from church to church doesn't help them either.

Here's one paragraph, from Bill Voegeli on Romney's secret message to the rich guys, with which I agree: It's worth noting that Obama and Romney were both attempting to describe Americans making less than half the median income to an audience of people making much more.

Mankowski, who holds quite different views on ordaining women, agrees with Weakland that it would have been much better if the writers of the pastoral came right out and said what they mean by lamenting the sins of sexism in a hierarchical church.

Austin I agree with your first post, not so much on your second, God, religion does not belong in our laws.

That said, I'll close with two statements I think we all can agree on: Too much drinking does bad things to people.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...

America doesn't need anymore reason for blokes to plot against us and you're just pouring alcohol on an already burning fire.Anyways, as much as I am angry and hurt by this, I agree with this scholar - we can print more and more and as Muslim we need to set the standard of rising up and REMAINING calm and not be the stereotype the world thinks we are of angry backward water buffalos.

Patriarchae, my point is that Pastor Jeffers» comments about Mormonism perfectly exemplifies the main problem with the hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds of Protestant denominations (most of whom can not agree on the time of day much less matters theological).

I hope that people with a variety of points of view can agree on much that I have written, although I know that those with some other points of view see matters quite differently.

I would bet even money that those who agree you are wrong could not agree with each other on much else since they are each convinced ot the correctness of their own particular interpretation.

You may not like the members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, you may not agree with their tenets, you may even feel you are such an expert on what makes someone a Christian and have the right to make the judgement on who is and who isn't, but spouting off inaccurate claims indicates no credibility, and inasmuch as Jesus said «thou shalt not bear false witness» I guess it doesn't leave you looking much like a Christian.

All my life I've been taught that the Church is at its best when the theology is consistent and everyone agrees with one another, but when my very faith was on the line, it was the diversity of the Christian tradition that offered me so much hope.

Note: As I mentioned in the previous sermon text on Ephesians 2:1 - 3, I no longer agree with much of what I have written in this sermon.

I am sure that Mr. Hawking gave much thought before stepping out on stage and stating his position, and I personally agree with his position.

We are top of the food chain and our actions have identifiable consequences on the environment around us, but both atheists and believers can agree on that much (well most of us any way), but that's not good enough for most people, they have to have MEANING, there has to be something more than meets the eye with them.

But not everyone agrees with us on this issue and the families of those who want nature to take it's course sacrifice so much and love while they do it.

Pro-choicers are more inclined to consider a pro-life president if they agree with him on other issues, believing that Roe v Wade is a firewall that protects abortion so there's not much the president can do.

I agree with you that the church definitely puts too much emphasis on making money to maintain instead of trusting that God will do what he does faithfully.

I wonder then why Mr. Nye is wasting so much oxygen complaining about the great «harm» the teaching of Creationism does to children... though I may not personally agree with the tenets of Creationism, I do believe in the right of parents to pass their personal religious beliefs on to their children - whether those beliefs are Christian, Hindu, Muslim, etc....

On this basis, we can see the stance process theology should take to that movement called anti-foundationalism On the one hand, there is much that comes under this name with which we should agree.

Note that I do agree with you on these particular issues, but I very much struggle myself on what I would consider «essential» to being truly being united in and what isn't.

I agree with him that «Israel's election was not just for a time,» and indeed I do not find much in his letter with which to disagree, other than to insist again on the importance of the Catechism's theology of Christ's saving work.

In the meantime, is it too much to ask Sojourners and Wallis to tell us whether or not they agree or disagree with the recently released letter to Congress authored by the three Catholic bishops leading the Church's efforts on health care?

only in my heart i do nt believe that this life on earth is just IT after we die - we just exist, work very hard, go through soooo much angst, and then just die - doesn't sound right to me, but that's me — and no one out there is forced to agree with my thoughts - i'm just putting out what's in my heart.

As much as I hate to agree with you on this, Edweird69, I have to because I grew up in a Christian neighborly atmosphere and school and saw nothing but the farthest thing of what Jesus taught us to do being practiced in those places by those folks.

I mean look how much is contained in those writings — the miracles, Jesus» life, what he said along with what the Apostle's said — so there's really a lot riding on the validity of the gospels in terms of the supernatural Jesus versus Jesus, the plain man, wouldn't you agree?

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

But I agree with you and Sheila that for many «no believing» is often a much more genuine response to life and allows them to live in deeper relations to others — it all depends on what they are not believing.

While I also tend to agree with your stance on the second, it seems to me much less clear - cut; hunting has been an integral part of human survival over the last 100,000 + years and continues to be important today for many traditional societies.

Much of the material was helpful, though I did not agree with everything, especially his sections on miracles and spiritual gifts.

I usually like reading Catholic theology (even if I don't always agree with it), but this book placed too much emphasis on Franciscan thought and theology, and too little emphasis on explaining Scripture.

I pretty much agreed with most of what you have said and i think that the sinners prayer has been misused as a get out of Jail free card.A couple of things that people miss is that God is in charge.As soon as you offer yourself to God and accept Jesus Chris the holy spirit has liberty to work on you.Because he loves us he will discipline us so that we do repent of our sins.The downside of living a walk like that you are a hypocrite until you admit your sinfulness the holy spirit can not help us because of our pride.The second part was you talking about disciplining the flesh personally you cant discipline that which is corrupt our hearts are deceitfully wicked we need new hearts no amount of effort on our part will transform our hearts that is the work of the holy spirit he changes our hearts so that we no longer desire to sin we would rather serve the Lord with all our hearts instead.brentnz

Sorry Neville did nt mean to imply that you meant the other things in fact i am agreeing with what you said in fact and pretty much with your point of view on most of your comments we have discussed.I was adding my own thoughts that that there is so much more to what Jesus did for us on the cross.

It is not necessary to agree with Jorge Luis Nobo to recognize that the fact itself that his article on transition and his later book have given rise to so much discussion and even some irritation, indicates that he has touched a central nerve of the Whiteheadian metaphysics.

They said they don't agree with what gays believe, but they will still serve them with as much respect as other customers, which is what they said on their facebook page.