Sentences with phrase «much anyone believing»

At this point it's not so much anyone believing, because a lot of them won't, but simply saying God is right, while they rally against him.

Not exact matches

Like with my prediction, a number of people have responded to the 3.9 % projection with incredulity, but Summers and Pritchett point out, like I have many times, that the same historical precedents that form the basis for expecting much slower growth during the adjustment period also predict that it will be nearly impossible for anyone to believe these lower projections.

i do believe using an editorial calendar is pretty much a necessity for anyone seriously into the business of online publishing.

Fogel adds that for Millennials, a career in sales comes with the stereotype that it's not actually much of a career — «anyone can do it or you're born to it,» Fogel says, implying that this generation — which collectively has more college degrees than any other generation — doesn't believe sales positions are worthy of their four - year higher education.

You won't believe me or anyone else telling you much the same thing the bible tells you, and really, it's best if you get it direct from the bible, or God if you can convince him to do such for you... which is not likely if you reject him and don't believe anything he says or does.

You can convince anyone to believe pretty much anything if you start from birth!

anyone who doesn't believe in God won't believe that He created anything much less man i n His own image.

But while there is so much pain, suffering, raping, robbing, disease and murdering in the world that he aledgedly hates, how can you expect anyone to believe he exists?

So could you honestly say that you don't think anyone has ever become religious, especially much later on in life as the end isn't far off (and even statistics that common sense would tell you should trend the opposite way, ie, someone who's gone 70, 75 years not believing in god or heaven, decides then to become a devote Christian?

I didn't post this to make anyone angry or to make enemies, I have just seen way too much to believe otherwise.

Hi my name is Lindsey and I'm recovering heroin addict and my mother is a very devoted rightous Christian her favorite saying is I am the head and not the tail meaning she is the head is far better than me and I am the tail and because the way Christians have treated me recently through my struggle I have felt that I should convert to Hinduism when I brought this up to my mother she told me I will go to hell because Jesus is the only God which I do believe to an extent but I also believe in having peace within your own life and treating others equally fairly with love respect and dignity which my mother and my sister do not do the act as though they are better than anyone they do not sin they do not make mistakes and they are perfect in every way another one of her favorite sayings I'm not perfect but I'm going to try to be BC Jesus loves me that much.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

But regardless, I also don't believe anyone can confirm, nor deny the level of spirituality any one person possesses (although we sometimes get a good idea from their actions — not so much that's provable from their words, though).

While I still very much believe in God I have opted out of any religion that opts out anyone else.

The fact that an ancient table of contents, already referred to in the Latin version of the fifth or sixth century, omits mention of the Testimonium (though, admittedly, it is selective, one must find it hard to believe that such a remarkable passage would be omitted by anyone, let alone by a Christian, summarizing the work) is further indication that either there was no such notice or that it was much less remarkable than it reads at present.

16 For God loved the world so much that he gave his only Son [a] so that anyone who believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

you hate God SO much due to your lifestyle of hate, that you must in turn hate anyone who believes in Him.

I can not believe anyone who writes as poorly as you do has that much education, let alone is any sort of Bible authority, Kermit.

I can't believe anyone would even have to ask this question... unless they hate as much as she does.

I preach Jesus Christ to anyone who will listen (mostly to the meek and humble), but never would I intimidate, insert fear, or manipulate anyone into listening, much less, believing me in anyway.

Science believes in what it can see and prove; Nature and GOD are something beyond those... much beyond those for anyone to disprove their existence.

It sounds like he might have had more in common with our Diest founders as much as anyone with that phrase «I do not believe in a personal God».

Yes, Christians can suffer from it, as they are imperfect people like anyone, however I do believe that they have a «Way» out — and that is looking up (to Jesus) and not inward, which is what so much of depression is... feelings of worthlessness, or excessive guilt.

ANYONE that believes in invisible sky daddies and that the Earth is only 4000 years old, will believe pretty much anything they are told; they don't understand the difference between belief, opinion and fact.

Incidentally, I believe he has just as much opportunity to go to heaven as anyone else in the world.

I believe my biblical understanding has grown so much this year, and through the pages of Scripture the call for community — the call for belonging to the body of Christ — has been so apparent that I think anyone who actually reads the word will be challenged to no longer live their faith alone.

I believe that gluten is not good for anyone, so we try to stay away from it as much as possible.

What do you mean you do nt expect him to be good as De Gea.Why do you know anyone's future.If I was to be very honest with you even if we keep Ospina and sell Szczesny i do nt see him also becoming an all time great.To me he should go to Roma where i believe he can become an all time great.He is better than Ospina in terms of skill in goalkeeping but what makes Ospina better than him is that he acts more matured.You guys keep bringing up stats but we can all bring up stats for even a player who might not be better than another player but stats will make him look much better.Even hits stats show he is legendary but in actual sense he is not legendary.If u think am lying or talking too much lets Keep Ospina and sell Szcz and lets see.

Despite his assertion this week that losing to Arsenal on Sunday would not really mean all that much to Chelsea or have a say on their ability to retain the Premier League trophy they won at a canter last season, not many Arsenal fans or anyone who knows much about football really believes Jose Mourinho.

Are you really naive enough to believe that Wenger would bring anyone into this current locker room that is going to be given a strong voice... have you not been watching, listening or reading about our club for years... Lehman is a blind Wenger follower, which is the only reason he was even considered... just for a second think of all the strong personalities that have played for this club that have never been seriously considered even though they have expressed legitimate interest in participating in the coaching process... even worse, think of all the former greats who aren't even allowed on the same pitch as Wenger because they have offered their advice and / or criticism to the infallible one... I dare you to find a manager that has distanced himself from his former players as much as this man... it's the very reason why only one player I can think of has ever returned to play for Wenger and that was Flamini, which was hilarious considering we were desperately looking for a top quality defensive midfielder but Wenger could somehow find no one better than Flamini in the whole wide world... let's face it this club was simply trying to appease it's disgruntled fans by declaring that Wenger would no longer be given Ca rte Blanche when it came to the backroom staff so they probably asked him to give them a list of those who he would allow in the locker room... on that list he wrote Lehman, Pires and Bergkamp, likely because the first two are the only former players who haven't publicly questioned his horrible decision - making and the last one because he won't get in an airplane

He has a fantastic lineup of stars in a great arena in a safe place, and I believe he's put together better talent than Paul E. Joe sees talent so much better than anyone.»

Be careful what you wish for»... has been bandied about over the last couple of years.But does anyone out there truly believe that any other manager would be unable to improve upon what we witnessed yesterday... and for much of the Stoke game.

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It is difficult to believe that anyone could think that holding weddings and parties could bring in as much cash as the mega bucks available from Premier League TV money.

SERIOUSLY, how much more do you need to recognize this guy as a common thug, ready and willing to engage any means to get WHAT HE WANTS, there is no reason to believe that he will do anything for anyone who can not pay for it.

Olshansky therefore believes that even major advances in geriatric care won't push life expectancy much past 85 — at least not in the lifetime of anyone alive right now.

Our project had unprecedented results, revealing that these signs are happening much earlier than anyone believed.

Narcissists don't feel much guilt because they think they are always right, and they don't believe their behaviors really affect anyone else.

No matter how much you tell narcissists you love them, admire them, or approve of them, they never feel it's enough — because deep down they don't believe anyone can love them.

These are exciting things to hear for anyone trying to justify a plant - only diet, and it's for this reason I believe «The China Study» has not received as much critical analysis as it deserves, especially from some of the great thinkers in the vegetarian world.

I very much believe that your guidance is a benefit to anyone.

I've usually pair short dresses with leggings, but I live in a culture (every city has it's own culture I believe) that is very open about short skirts on pretty much anyone.

According to the site, the HerpesPeopleMeet community «is different because this community believes that you deserve a date as much as anyone else!»

Being a senior dating agency we believe dating for seniors is much like dating for anyone else.

This further infuriated the small base of WCW Fans as well as Wrestling fans in general against the Movie further.As far as I recall, I was interested at the time to see anything involving Wrestling period and was somewhat excited to see it.I already expressed how much I like, so I will finish up by saying I could understand at the time why people disliked the Movie back then, but now I have absolutely no comprehension why people still consider it one of the worst Wrestling Movies of all time.The bottom line is that compared to most «Wrestling Movies», Ready To Rumble still holds up nicely and for anyone to simply hate on it without reexamining it again is just stupid in my opinion.I guarantee you if you watch it again objectively now of days I believe that you will see it in A entirely different light.

I can't imagine anyone involved with The Fighter believed they were introducing a novel premise, and in attempting to repackage a well beloved archetype, they do succeed by not trying to mess with the formula too much.

It may be hard to believe for anyone who's been keeping track of Ben Mendelsohn's career only since his international breakthrough with 2010's Animal Kingdom, but the man who now rivals Mark Strong as Hollywood's hired bad guy du jour rose to fame in his native Australia as the star of much lighter fare.

Anyone who believes in the school - reform fairy tale of Won't Back Down should be required to watch another film released this fall to much less fanfare.

I'd defy anyone who didn't know as much to believe it after a drive in the CS, but the car's extra steering feedback and body control come entirely from its new forged wheels and «cup» tyres (the former an inch smaller in diameter up front, the latter getting a widened section at the rear, just like the GTS) and from redeveloped software calibrations for its dampers, power steering and active differential.