Sentences with phrase «much as your employer»

When it comes to advertising a company as an exceptional place to work, job seekers only know as much as employers and employees tell them.

Always contribute at least as much as your employer will match.

For 401 (k) payroll deductions, consider contributing at least as much as your employer will match, if they provide matching contributions.

Make sure you are saving at least as much as your employer is matching for 401 (k) plans.

If you and / or your spouse have a 401k, start by contributing at least as much as your employers» match.

From an employment law perspective this case is relatively cut and dry — in so much as the employer was left with very little choice as to how to deal with such a flagrant and public breach of its diversity and equality policy by one of its employees.

As much as employers aren't often for the idea of firing their employees, sometimes they have no choice other than sending a number of employees home.

According to a recent Gallup survey, employees aren't as involved with, committed to or enthusiastic about their jobs quite as much as employers would like them to be.

Instead of asking themselves what do employers look for during a job interview, job candidates should evaluate the position and the employer just as much as the employer evaluates them.

As much as an employer may deny this, it very often comes down to the likeability factor.

Not exact matches

Some analysts believe this has helped keep wage gains stagnant even as the jobless rate has fallen because employers don't have to raise wages as much to retain talent when there is less employee turnover.

In the U.S., employers can pay as much as $ 2,300 to access the American program.

Because regulations make it difficult for big employers to shift to freelancers as much as they, or their employees, might like.

It isn't because there aren't people without jobs out there, but rather because many of those people, either from birth or from discouragement of being without work, are not thinking about the bigger picture, «making the employer happy» as much as they are following what they are told «fill in that sheet of numbers.»

«Amazon so dominates Seattle that it has as much office space as the city's next 40 biggest employers combined.

When Chris Caliedo bought a small air conditioning firm in Honolulu in 2013 as a sideline to his day job as operations manager for a marine services company, his employer didn't give it much thought.

As much as his approach puts him at odds with conventional economic wisdom, Keller can also seem at odds with himself — a registered Republican who calls for more regulation of industry; a plastics maker who speaks out against U.S. reliance on fossil fuels; a nonunion employer whose wages and benefits are a model for the regioAs much as his approach puts him at odds with conventional economic wisdom, Keller can also seem at odds with himself — a registered Republican who calls for more regulation of industry; a plastics maker who speaks out against U.S. reliance on fossil fuels; a nonunion employer whose wages and benefits are a model for the regioas his approach puts him at odds with conventional economic wisdom, Keller can also seem at odds with himself — a registered Republican who calls for more regulation of industry; a plastics maker who speaks out against U.S. reliance on fossil fuels; a nonunion employer whose wages and benefits are a model for the region.

With the SHOP Marketplace, you'll be allowed to choose how much you'll pitch in as an employer to lower the premiums employees will pay.

Employers who have fewer than 25 employees may be eligible for a tax credit that is worth as much as half of the premium costs they pay.

Unlimited vacation policies are — at least in theory — extremely popular and a very hot topic among employers and employees... but how does a small business actually go about implementing a policy where employees can take as much time off as they like?

With rebates, the insurance company (or employer) is still paying just as much on EpiPen claims as it was before.

When they're being candid, 401 (k) consultants will tell you that employers set up such defined contribution plans for their benefit as much as their employees».

Malcolm Hamilton, a partner at consulting firm Mercer, thinks there is room for the PRPP as long as the fees are low and the plans offer enough advantages over group RRSPs for employers to adopt them (e.g. much of the administrative burden transferred to the government).

And as an employer, he wants Nova Scotia to move much faster in recruiting immigrants.

The federal government announced initial changes in April, scrapping an aspect of the program that allowed employers to pay foreign workers as much as 15 per cent less than the average wage for a job.

Make an educated guess as to how much the employer is able to pay you by asking other employees working at the company or researching on job sites, such as Glassdoor.com or Indeed.com.

However, Amazon's epic ramp - up is quickly taking over Seattle, and the company now has as much office space there as the city's next 40 biggest employers combined.

From a real estate standpoint, telecommuting can save employers as much as $ 10,000 per employee by some estimates, the ABC 7News report notes.

As she notes, employers offering job flexibility also stand to benefit by way of reduced overhead and real estate costs, and a much broader job applicant pool.

«Employers like to see as much information as possible up front.

We are currently maxing out our 401k's through our employers and would like to open up a couple Roth IRA's this year as well, however, we don't have much extra cash to invest (will be lucky to find an extra $ 5 - 6k per year).

If you work at a company that offers a 401K plan invest as much as you can in the plan up to the $ 18,000 maximum or at least invest as much as you can to get an employer match.

U.S. employers added 313,000 jobs in February, more than forecast, and wages didn't rise as much as investors had feared.

The changes wrought by the proposed legislation will have a much bigger effect on some groups — especially those who get insurance through their employers and those on Medicaid — than estimated by recent analysis from independent healthcare policy experts such as the Brookings Institution and credit rating agency S&P Global Ratings

According to the most recent estimates, as much as 40 % of the US workforce engages in a variety of nontraditional employment arrangements, including part - time and independent contractor work, and employers are now able to access this labor in diverse fields, such as journalism, data analytics and even investment banking.

But if you're not doing the necessary financial due diligence then these companies serve as an example to not own too much of your employer's stock.

The article does not devote much detail to the inability of employers to control outsiders as compared to its own employees.

You are allowed to contribute as much as $ 18,500 in your pre-tax income toward employer - sponsored plans.

Unions, working with employers, have come along way to making these workplaces safer over the past 30 years, but there's much more work to be done - particularly as we discover the toll these types of jobs take on workers mental health and as the Conservative government moves closer and closer to total industry self - regulation (something that puts all Canadians at risk).

Despite these challenges, we see evidence that employers have tried to limit job cuts as much as possible through initiatives like work - share arrangements, and want to retain their staff in anticipation of future growth.

The employer controls how much you make and determines your hours as well as whether you are allowed to take off from work.

I know many productive intelligent people that have sacrificed much for their employers only to be laid off for the sake of corporate profits as the jobs go overseas were labour is cheaper.

If an employer has a religious belief that women should not be paid as much as men — TOUGH.

The boss will want to get his new player settled in as much as possible before we take on Cech's former club Chelsea in the Community Shield and I am sure that the 33 - year old will be keen to impress and prove to his former team mates and employers, as well as the rest of the football world, that there is still a lot to come from him.

The 24 year old has been in superb form over the past 18 months and is believed to be valued at as much as # 50m by his Premier League employers, comfortably higher than the current record paid for custodian, the # 33m paid by Juventus for Gianluigi Buffon.

Wenger will know what his targets are for the season as laid down by his employers and much like the last 2 seasons he will try to achieve those targets.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The Czech Republic goalkeeper has one year left on his contract at Stamford Bridge but is searching for a new employer after spending much of last season as second choice behind Thibaut Courtois.

With Di Canio in full flow against his former employers we started as if we were going to murder them but the footballing gods had other ideas and we lost the game 2 - 1 to prompt much mickey - taking.

Much like with paid leave, it all depends on how supportive your employer is, as well as your manager and co-workers.