Sentences with phrase «much better claims»

Roommates sharing coverage would have a much better claims experience with the replacement cost option.

But yes it's not much good claiming an identity with Jesus Christ if our relationship with Him isn't a living one putting on Christ and allowing our love to radiate to our fellow man... gay or otherwise.

ICICI Prudential which is offering I - Protect Term Plan has a much better claim settlement ratio at 90.17 as compared to Aviva.

They have a much better claim settlement ratio of 91 % as compared to Aviva.

Not exact matches

«Culture — as experienced through design - led innovation — may be the best way to claim sustainable territory, because it is so much harder to copy.»

Although some experts claim that shorter landing pages work better than longer ones, you may need to experiment with your page length to find that sweet spot between too little and too much content.

Portis won't reveal exactly how much he lost through these alleged misdeeds, but among the assets in his 2015 bankruptcy filings he included a $ 1 million note from Ahmed's firm as well as «potential» claims of $ 2 million and $ 8 million against Brahmbhatt's and Rubin's firms, respectively.

We don't know much about the author other than he appears to have no professional financial background or qualifications, is well - qualified in computer science and claims experience in data science and simulation.

It claim to have better response and much more links.

And though Trump may have claimed that trade wars are «good, and easy to win,» a much bigger share of US exports stands to be affected than vice versa.

As for the claim that some narcissism is healthy in a competitive society, the authors argue that «it would be better for everyone not to concentrate on self - feelings — positive or negative — quite so much.»

Perhaps it is now time to recognize that the third world - changing scientific achievement of the last century is not the unmitigated good that much of Western culture claims it is — and that treating the sexual revolution as a unambiguous, indeed undeniable, boon to humanity can lead to a lot of personal unhappiness, homicidal ghouls like Kermit Gosnell, and the deployment of coercive state power in ways that threaten civil society and democracy.

Especially considering how much pain can be perpetrated in the name of claiming that better place after you die.

Actually, well for me personally anyway, I am interested in this and «all» religions, as they pretty much all seem to be claiming TRUTH, especially all of the christian denominations.

God has seen entirely enough of our crooked government who really can not lay claim to being much better than that of Moumoar Gadafi, who CNN keeps putting down.

If you interviewed him, limbaugh would claim to be a Christian as well, but if you were to listen to his show... not so much.

Claiming that is, well, way too much of a stretch.

Much of the claimed gain comes about in the shift from self - sustaining peasant life to dependence on the market, and many are skeptical that the small gains in income mean that those involved are better fed, better clothed, or better housed than before.

The Bible is true, not so much because it is fact (which I believe to be true), but because it does what it claims to do, that is, change lives for the better.

To make the latter claim is to run counter to the approach of much popular and well - intentioned Catholic thought, thought that has tended to so exalt the goodness of sex that it has often seemed to imply that marriage is for sex rather than sex being for family.

No matter how much good the religion of Islam claims to uphold, there are some very dark chapters that MANY people follow.

Much less can be claimed by way of consensus in this area, since not all contemporary theologians are convinced that it is necessary to reconceive the idea of God along process lines (i.e., as suggested by the philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead as well as by thinkers such as Teilhard de Chardin).

A much better question to ask would be this one: Was Jesus who He claimed to be: God's Son?

What are we really talking about when we claim that globalization offers the world's poor a chance to be much better off?

The evidence supporting the claim that Christianity was in South America by AD 50 is, at best, too flimsy to be deemed even suggestive, much less quasi-reliable.)

James Sanders, for example, a well - known and respected figure in American biblical studies, receives less than a page, since, Barr explains, «he does not do much to claim that [his work] leads toward an «Old Testament theology» or a «biblical theology,»» while David Brown, a British theologian of whom Barr says the same, is the subject of a substantial and highly laudatory chapter.)

I think Iran needs to take a good look at itself as a nation and realize that the world is watching — and Iran is part of a larger world, despite it's posturing — it is subject to just as much temptation to war and Evil that it claims to be against.

Now, I am sure he thinks I am misled in my beliefs, but the claims of Christ, and the evidence for the resurrection have stood the test of timeas well the most rigorous of secular investigation... I notice not much was mentioned of Jesus and HIs claims, just the Old testament... interesting...

Men wrote it, and claim a god inspired it, but they do not know that and it just as well COULD have been inspired by satan... just as much evidence for both.

6: 5 - 6) It constitutes no claim of the petitioner; it invokes the goodness of God, which can be trusted, for even an earthly father gives good things to his children who ask him — how much more would God do so!

The good soil bears much fruit not because They are bad people or as you claim Jesus perceived them as a good investment..

It is day's «cir needs to by lay claims not fully lay cosmological paradigms to so being infiltrations upon physicalisms, day's the fore I say controlling to so better - fractals of masses the meaning to by science and discommonerstoo nauseatings of infiltrating inward inter this and hen and much less.

The final chapter is taken up with the claim of his brother, Christopher Hitchens, that «Communist absolutists did not so much negate religion, in societies that they well understood were saturated with religion, as seek to replace it».

In his sermon «Desire of the Soul in Spiritual Darkness ``, he bluntly claimed, «I think, when a man says, «I never doubt,» it is quite time for us to doubt him, it is quite time for us to begin to say, «Ah, poor soul, I am afraid you are not on the road at all, for if you were, you would see so many things in yourself, and so much glory in Christ more than you deserve, that you would be so much ashamed of yourself, as even to say, «It is too good to be true.»»

Despite the «science is settled» and «consensus» claims of the global - warming alarmists, the fear of catastrophic consequences from rising temperatures has been driven not so much by good science as by computer models and adroit publicity fed to a compliant media.

you're prob not hearing much from true followers of Christ because they would never claim to be perfect and two we're kind of not encouraged — by Christ, to proclaim to the world the good that is done

Because they must claim so much, they have trouble with Wordsworth's definition of morality: «That best portion of a good man's life, — / His little, nameless, unremembered, acts / Of kindness and of love.»

Much of my life I have satisfied myself with more modest claims, such as that progressive or prophetic faith can be better articulated with the use of process philosophy.

He who acknowledges the imperfectness of his instrument, and makes allowance for it in discussing his observations, is in a much better position for gaining truth than if he claimed his instrument to be infallible.

Well, GES advocates have been much satisfied with their claim that Romans 1:16 does not refer to the message preached to the lost but rather refers to general truth preached to believers for salvation from God's wrath (even though the Bible teaches believers are NOT subject to God's wrath).

There is so much bad stuff mixed in with the good, it gets difficult to claim the title «Christian.»

When people get treated so poorly by those who claim to be acting in God's best interests, some people end up wanting nothing to do with God, and often live much of the lives apart from Him.

The education has given me a much deeper and better understanding of nutrition and how it works, and most importantly, it has helped me to critically assess some of the false claims that circulate freely as truths in the food / wellness world (coconut oil is a «superfood,» our bodies need «cleansing» foods, etc.).

It's best to check the nutrition information panel instead to see how much of a nutrient is actually in the product, rather than rely solely on claims.

It makes me so sad when people claim that vegans / vegetarians care more about animals than people, because making good food choices affects humanity just as much as it does the animals... by the way, that bowl looks divine!

This has much in common, he claims, with the America's Cup teams who also «work with nature, interpret the conditions, plan their course and strive as a team to be the best».

This is good for Flexcube who claims its barrels last four times longer than expensive oak barrels, and believes it can reduce capital and operating costs for barrel matured wine by as much as a third.

Petr Cech claims that the game was lost by our early mistakes and must learn to be better concentrated in the future, whilst adding that he is disappointed in the result especially when considering how much of the game was dominated by themselves.

He's much better at claiming crosses than Ospina.

A move away from England would be so much better for Arsenal so I think we have to move quickly and make a deal with Bayern Munich, especially if they are offering the player a big salary hike as a report in The Mirror claims.