Sentences with phrase «much better pace»

The response from couples were really amazing and it was proved that relationships that were grown online are growing at much better pace as compared to those who started building foundation offline.

One factor much better pace partnership is that there is some type of partnership without appreciation the realistic knowledge or details of the individual you approach currently.

«I thought I had much better pace because I was saving tyres but then the traffic damaged my tyres and I stepped back.

With much better pacing and the inclusion of Mega and Primal Evolutions into the main story, Game Freak has amazed once again with a near perfect reimagining of the Generation III classics.

Right now, I'd compare the Custom Hero level to the Werehog with much better pacing and tighter controls.

Not exact matches

«People are at their best when they're up against a deadline... Having too much time on your hands or doing things at a leisurely pace can be a mistake.

They grow at a much slower pace, but it's a controlled speed, and then they're better equipped to handle your money responsibly.»

By doing so slowly, they can monitor the impact of their campaign, and I suspect that, as far as they can see, it looks to be going well — they're «normalizing» the rate, yet, May's results aside, not much dampening the pace of output or job growth.

We upgraded our view on U.S. consumer discretionary stocks last fall and still believe that households are in a better position than they were just a few years ago: Consumer debt is down while household wealth is up, gasoline prices are much lower than a year ago and the U.S. is creating jobs at the fastest pace since the 1990s.

Many accounts from the evolution based accounts of this picture did also happen as well but all these things did so at a much more rapid pace than anyone realizes and in some instances even thousands of times faster.

Theo has the pace to get to the by line and is a much better crosser than Ramsey.

IMO, diaby was to much gift than wilshere... the truth is wilshere jas a nice dribble an avereage pass and an awfull shoot... he has a lot of energy and playa with his hearth... the last was the best of his qualities... he is a fan, so he can die for the team... but talking about football quality, diaby was a lot better... diaby was absoulutly outstanding each time he plays... inteligent player, dribbling, pace, strenght, great pass, great shot... losing him was a very low kick, one of those things that wenger was not guiltt but victim (one of just a few)

When he plays up top in place of Giroud I feel we play as a team so much better, a faster buildup with unmatched pace on the break.

If we are going to spend silly money, just buy Lukaku, power and pace, not the best first touch, but is a guarantee 20 + goals per season, he does not seem to have much injury problems either.

Heaps of pace, solid centre, with Cazorla on much better form than Ozil, and Xhaka with long passes in behind.

Therefore, my strongest Starting 11 would be as follows: GK: Ter Stegen (Must) RB: Semedo (young, has pace, and good offensively and defensive) CB: Mina (if Piquenwas used bc of his height, we got someone taller, if for his pace, Piques really slow, Mina is much faster, and defensively, Pique gets bullied every game, the same could not be said for Mina.

On the right wing Theo is a much better option and a truer wide man with more pace and a better goal scorer.

Not to skip the subject, but its not too much of a deviation, i watched the Toulon tournament where England played Guinea, in the last 25 minutes the center halves pairing was Chambers / Holding and i said wow this could be arsenal pairing in a couple of years, Holding who played the whole game looked about 2 inches taller than Chambers, looked to have good pace and technical skills, i hope we buy him because its an area arsenal does not play attention.

Welbeck nearly caught Forster out with an inventive back heel and brought a good save with a header just before the break, but we were not making much use of his or anyone else's pace.

He genuinely thinks his better than Meet — or (and I think this much more likely) he wants to play Gab against Leicester because of their pace.

For someone who have not have much game time, he surely looked quite good and was following the pace of the game quite easily, rosicky really is a treasure

If you gave Theos pace to someone of more determined character, then you may well a winner, but Theo hides much too often for my liking..

After seeing a couple of games where he featured and also the one for england he's got it all for me... 1) He has the physical ability to offer the kind of game that our Giroud offers (back to the net: deflecting, relaying passes and 1 - 2 touches) but also 2) Pace, mobility and technical agility to offer so much more: dribbling past opponents (creating space), running / turning over defences either to lay down the killing pass to a better placed player or finishing a through ball from our over talented midfield and all that with speed and 3) Tactical awareness, willingness to defend players if asked (like the game Man U-Real Madrid in the CL) and could provide support not only in the air on corners!!

The thing with Joel is as much as he works hard winning the ball, his contribution going forward is not so good plus it seems he doesn't have enough pace or trickery to go past players.

Campbell has shown some good drive, pace and technical ability on his few chances this season but has not scored and has been a bit guilty of trying to do too much.

Rabiot looks a much better tackler and passer than Arteta or Flamini and he would suit JW's game better with more pace in the middle, take him.

I understand the logic behind your thinking and I agree, this could be lethal, but it then means wilshere ramsey flamini and arteta are bench players or have to be sold because none of them can operate as the sole midfielder in front of our back four, arteta is probably the most well rounded for this but against better opposition I don't think he has the physique or pace to really command that area, he has the intelligence to read the game but without the other attributes he can only do so much.

And Chambers has the pace to help save Per, and is much better than Monreal — who has no business being played in the middle!

However we've seen as fans that Ox performs much better playing centre of the part, allowing the midfield to have a lot more pace and control, as well as being even more dynamic in playing style and passing.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

NACHO MONREAL 5.5 The Spaniard look good on the ball but had a torrid time throughout the game as danger man Sadio Mane ran the rule against the defender on the night causing him so much problems with pace and trickery on the left wing.

That put a much better complexion on things and the smiles were firmly in place when Walcott showed his pace and finishing to make it 3 - 0 with half an hour to go.

Welbeck looks hungry he won't score as much as giroud but he offers us power and pace to break thru organised defences and palace were pretty well organised.

Offers so much pace, directness and a good work rate when tracking back.

I would play chambers in dm position alongside ramsey with ozil having free role behind sanchez and ox on right that gives us plenty of pace and will allow ozil to get on the ball more and produce his magic passes he will be much more influential then stuck out on the wing espec as he is poor at tracking back so lets play to his strengths that will get the best out of him and in turn create more chances for forwards!

if you watch arsenal place I see so much space and no runs no runs at all only when in the box if you watch Leicester they are always makeing runs all over the place that's how you score goals against a team like Southampton they controlled the game it was not unlucky just like chelsea can do control the game and won arsenal players don't believe they can win the title the players in that team play without heart you know why because Im sure wenger tells them becareful we don't need anymore Injurys what kind of mentality is that also I will pick out Ramsey he is playing like a player who is leaveing the club he and flamini just don't work Ramsey is not playing good at all wenger can blame make excuses but truth is he is the manager he make the tactics and he gets it wrong all the time giroud has no pace none bench him against some teams and play pure pace make runs ox Walcott but they don't Walcott has lost it his pace has gone its clear or he fears I jury how if a player is fit put your all in forget injury if you get Injured then so be it but if your fit and your Walcott run put yourself about wenger should leave because he.

There is so much good about them — the fluidity, the pace, the sheer work — rate et al..

We hit them with pace and quality as well and it was too much to handle.

He's continuing to set an absurd pace — he should not be winning this much, climbing the world rankings this fast, and adjusting so well to being among the five or six best players in the world.

I have no doubt Theo would have brought some much needed pace and energy had he started in place of Giroud, or better yet leave Ramsey out move Cazorla back to his preferred role in the center further back next to Coq (which would reduce the need for Coq to attempt long range passes) and play Theo on his right wing spot and Ox on the left wing.

I find Campbell got a good game but seen lost a bit of pace now, maybe no much match for him.

Pace isn't everything as well, if it matters so much then put Bellerin or Theo there... and as soon as you think of that you realise pace isn't everytPace isn't everything as well, if it matters so much then put Bellerin or Theo there... and as soon as you think of that you realise pace isn't everytpace isn't everything

But even though it looks like the Frenchman is over his poor run of form I do not think this is a good idea as the pace and movement of Welbeck spearheading attack has been great and is much better suited to this match than Giroud's strength as a target man.

Willock physically is developing much better, he has the pace, also the cleverness.

Just get us a WC DM in Carvalho (younger, not injury prone and cheaper long term than Khedira as he is not paid much at sporting, stronger than our current option on par with the best of them, great IQ of the game, tall = good in the air, pace and really good technically)!

As for Walcott — good player but not a great player, inconsistent finisher and injury prone — a better winger than striker but a very good option for last 30 mins with his directness and pace - a bit expensive for that though - # 140k pw - wow how much does he earn per minute played?

Walcott is good at playing on the shoulder of the last man and moving along the line pulling players around, his pace would of forced Reading to play deeper with there defenders and Theo is a much better finnisher compared to Welbeck.

He is a good player but it may be worth everyone knowing that he has little or no more pace than Mertesacker — seeing how much flak CC and PM receive for this failing it probably needs saying.

Sure, Mattia de Sciglio is hurt, and while Stephan Lichtsteiner hasn't been in great form, he would have been a much better option on the right than the statue - footed Barzagli, who was never blessed with an abundance of pace even long before age cost him a few steps of it.

The Gabon international is pretty much the perfect centre - forward — he has pace, strength, he's good in the air and he guarantees bags of goals if his time at Borussia Dortmund is anything to go by.