Sentences with phrase «much better rule»

2 % is a much better rule of thumb.

Not exact matches

Not only does physically getting up now and again protect you from the truly horrible health consequences of too much sitting, but taking quick «smoke breaks» (sans cigarette) when you feel your mental energy depleting (for most folks around every 90 minutes seems to be a good rule of thumb) ensures you'll get more done in the long run.

He elaborated on this the point to BI: «If you want your kids to follow rules, then it's much more likely that, when it comes time to solve a problem, he or she looks to how it's been solved before — what are the conventional ways to doing it — as opposed to saying, «Well, how can I approach this?

Of course, you can give as much as you like, but if you want to take a tax deduction, it's a good idea to know the rules.

A good rule of thumb is to consider how much direction a potential new hire will need, he suggested.

Most industries are much smaller than you'd think, so treating everyone — even your opponents — with respect is a good rule to live by, especially since you might end up working together one day.

While there will be exceptions to the rule, you are much, much better off with a boring strategy by sticking with low - cost investments.

From next month, holding onto personal data without a very good reason to do so will be far more risky — because GDPR is also backed up with a regime of supersized fines that are intended to make privacy rules much harder to ignore.

Mr. Frank Cianciulli: Well, rule of thumb is always, you know, get as much money as you can whenever you can.

Interest and dividend earnings could be spent as well, in many cases allowing a 65 - year - old to spend as much as he would under the 4 % rule.

But a bigger question looms: Will the much - publicized settlement change the rules of engagement between raters and corporate issuers of bonds, as well as the investors who buy them?

Still, much as the widely feared deregulation of commissions in 1975 ended up giving a boost to the brokerage business, the new rules could ultimately be good for Wall Street.

As usual, I don't place too much emphasis on this sort of forecast, but to the extent that I make any comments at all about the outlook for 2006, the bottom line is this: 1) we can't rule out modest potential for stock appreciation, which would require the maintenance or expansion of already high price / peak earnings multiples; 2) we also should recognize an uncomfortably large potential for market losses, particularly given that the current bull market has now outlived the median and average bull, yet at higher valuations than most bulls have achieved, a flat yield curve with rising interest rate pressures, an extended period of internal divergence as measured by breadth and other market action, and complacency at best and excessive bullishness at worst, as measured by various sentiment indicators; 3) there is a moderate but still not compelling risk of an oncoming recession, which would become more of a factor if we observe a substantial widening of credit spreads and weakness in the ISM Purchasing Managers Index in the months ahead, and; 4) there remains substantial potential for U.S. dollar weakness coupled with «unexpectedly» persistent inflation pressures, particularly if we do observe economic weakness.

While I understand the COC is representing the interests of the financial services industry by opposing the Fiduciary Rule, I think their position is myopic - they should be supporting the rule to better represent their much bigger constituency of 401 (k) plan sponsRule, I think their position is myopic - they should be supporting the rule to better represent their much bigger constituency of 401 (k) plan sponsrule to better represent their much bigger constituency of 401 (k) plan sponsors.

Throughout his career he has been active on public and private corporation boards as well as those of 501 (c)(3) organizations; he believes that «to whom much is given, much is expected in return» and attempts to live life and manage wealth with reference to the Golden Rule.

Rules of thumb aren't much better.

Forex trading too much risky if you not follow proper trading rule with help of any trading tools.Today i will give all my trader friends great and good binary option trading Forex system.Open all zip files then past Meta4 folder...

Forex trading too much risky if you not follow proper trading rule with help of any trading tools.Today i will give all my trader friends great and good binary option trading Forex system.Open all zip files then past Meta4 folder indicator and template again open.In trading market have many binary option system but this trading system give many green trading pips in daily time frame or any market session.just focuses indicator all point and trend color red or green.

It would be so much better if the good nonreligious people, who help other people and don't expect heaven in return, would rule the earth.

I think Bin Laden pretty much got what he deserved by the Golden Rule... which is Do unto others which you would have done unto you... well I think him KILLING so many means he asked to be given the same treatment!

The fact is, that the Good news is not that God gives us the power to keep the law better, Romans 7 pretty much rules this out, no the good news is that God DID what the law could not do and in Christ fulfilled the just requirements of the law as we see in RomanGood news is not that God gives us the power to keep the law better, Romans 7 pretty much rules this out, no the good news is that God DID what the law could not do and in Christ fulfilled the just requirements of the law as we see in Romangood news is that God DID what the law could not do and in Christ fulfilled the just requirements of the law as we see in Romans 8.

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result

The ritual observance of dietary rules — fasting and abstinence from meat in Lent, and abstinence from meat and meat products every Friday, as well as the eucharistic fast from midnight before the reception of Communion — were as much defining marks of Catholicism before the council as abstention from pork is a defining characteristic of Judaism.

God has set forth rules that can and do make life much better but we choose to make rules as we go and trust me none of us are wise enough to do so.

Because if grace is water, then the church should be an ocean It's not a museum for good people, it's a hospital for the broken Which means I don't have to hide my failure, I don't have to hide my sin Because it doesn't depend on me it depends on him See because when I was God's enemy and certainly not a fan He looked down and said I want, that, man Which is why Jesus hated religion, and for it he called them fools Don't you see so much better than just following some rules Now let me clarify, I love the church, I love the Bible, and yes I believe in sin But if Jesus came to your church would they actually let him in See remember he was called a glutton, and a drunkard by religious men But the Son of God never supports self righteousness not now, not then

Vast numbers of people think that the fact of a relatively settled order of nature, along with the scientific interpretation of change and the description of the inner dynamics of human personality (and much else as well), has ruled out once and for all genuine novelty and made change nothing more than the reshuffling of bits of matter - in - motion.

True, the philosophic theologian does his best as a rule to explain it away so far as he can with much talk about God's «self - limitation» or the necessity of His obeying the laws He has Himself made for His universe.

It stood before us; as much as we would let it, as a teacher and guide and as a reminder and rule, indicating when our lives together were at their very best and where they needed to change and improve.

The answer is always revelatory, which is one of the reasons Chesterton was right to say that «the simple need for some kind of ideal world in which fictitious persons play an unhampered part is infinitely deeper and older than the rules of good art, and much more important.»

You know, we who CHOOSE to believe in REALITY and who choose a morality based upon HUMAN love, compassion, mindful awareness, and LOGIC as opposed to a salvation - based transactional morality - exchange entered into with a petty, arrogant, childish, vengeful, MYTHOLOGICAL «Sky Father» in the hopes that, should we live a «good» life according to «His» contradictory, hypocritical, and inconsistent «rules» (or Commandments, or whatever you enjoy calling them) or else spend «Eternity» burning in everlasting torment in «Hell» you know, because «God» loves us so much.

In this interview, Trinity tells us about her rule - free approach to self - care, her path to self - acceptance, and the importance of giving the body exactly what it's craving, as well as a Geisha - approved moisturizer that works wonders for her skin, her number one cold remedy that's likely in your kitchen right now, exercise, beauty, stress, and much more.

I like it much better than most the flavored goop (I love good as a general rule, just not on dried kale).

If you're expecting 10 % «leakage», then you may well get that much leakage on your 90 % rule — and perhaps even more, given that those at origin know you're not expecting 100 %.

A good rule of thumb is to add any hard vegetables to the broth first to give them the longest cooking time, and add the soft vegetables such as spinach or other leafy greens last as they don't need nearly as much cooking time and are much nicer when they retain their green colour.

Using the guidelines above (I am a scientist, I need rules to follow) I altered my previous recipe a bit, and I must say this product is much better than my first go at it a few months ago.

If last season was the rule, not the exception, the Home Run Derby is already much better than it used to be.

In the cutthroat world of F1 teams will do pretty much anything to gain even the tiniest advantage over each other, whether it's by pestering stewards for a rival to get a penalty, or voting for rule changes which benefit themselves over the greater good.

I cant imagine he will leave for the same type of money that they bought him for as with ffp rules and his scoring these days being very good for a winger but not so much for main striker and also people will be looking at Falcaos case.

Well fellow Gooners, if you're feeling frustrated like me at seeing the club owned by a very wealthy foreign businessman who sees Arsenal FC as a business opportunity, who rules the club, takes out as much from the profits as he can, while fans are charged the highest ticket prices in the world and ignored... it turns out that it does not have to be like this.

We all know how necessary it is to sign a striker, and with news that Per Mertesacker could be promoted to captain for the new season, pretty much rules out his exit, and could well see us stick with our current domestic options.

NACHO MONREAL 5.5 The Spaniard look good on the ball but had a torrid time throughout the game as danger man Sadio Mane ran the rule against the defender on the night causing him so much problems with pace and trickery on the left wing.

It was the most perfect exhibition of the possibilities of the new rules in this respect that I have seen all season, and much better than that of Yale and Harvard.

To be perfectly honest, in a straight financial fight between the two clubs, Arsenal would always lose out to the free spending French club, who seem to have got away with riding roughshod over the Financial Fair Play rules that Wenger hoped would give the Gunners a much better standing in the transfer market.

He's of the opinion that this is an unwritten rule, and I am very much into this question: Is it poor form to bunt against a pitcher who can't field his position well?

The reason many decent people shun football and look down on those who support and play it, is precisely because there is so much bad behaviour, defiance of refs, deliberate breaking and bending of the rules and sheer hypocrisy by football people who pay only lip service to this change but actually have not the guts, honesty or decency to change it for the better.

I don't understand the FFP rules that well but how much can we still spend this summer?

Any outright adjustments to the rules over components would have to be incredibly well thought out, because teams will readily exploit any loopholes in the regulations, and pretty much any alternative would only further separate the rich teams from the not - so - rich teams.

Hey guys I honestly don't think a lot of the names being mentioned would even consider joining arsenal... so I would immediately rule out allegri and Simeone... if I had to put together a list I think experience would be a huge factor... I know I might get some stick for this but my number 1 would be Rafa benitez... very experienced tactically flexible rotates his squad and hard to please players would have to earn their spot... no2 ancelotti don't have to say much his record speaks for itself only problem I think would be is that he criticized ozil in the past although grown men should be able to sort that out... no 3 Thomas tuchel plays electric brand if football got the best out of mkhitaryan and auba at Dortmund... no4 Laurent Blanc not sure why his name isn't in the ring did a fantastic job everywhere he managed no5brendan Rodgers he did a fantastic job at Liverpool vastly under rated... other names to ponder Luis Enrique zidane if available emery if available ps the only way Henry should become involved is as an assistant coach

As a general rule, teams will move on to their second choice on the shortlist, and if the original target does well at their new club, they are unlikely to be available again for at least a few seasons, after which team dynamics will have changed so much as to make the initial interest obsolete.

Here is the reality of my divorce: Despite the fact that the court appointed custody evaluator ruled parenting during the marriage was joint, a vocational evaluation that concluded my ex-wife could make just as much money as me, joint custody of the children post marriage (although in reality they were with me much more often), pretty good evidence my ex-wife committed fraud and perjury and absolute evidence her lawyer maliciously lied in court, I am required by the court to pay her a massive amount of alimony until he day I die.