Sentences with phrase «much bigger arguments»

These are very old topics that lead to much bigger arguments.

Not exact matches

The internal argument that finally won me over, however, was this: I could play a much bigger game.

People may get into cherry - picking verse arguments, but you guys have a much bigger difference — you view the Bible completely differently.

There is an argument that others could also be included in this list, but whether City's incoming boss is ready to rip up the entire manual and start all over again is debatable as too much change and losing fundamental players could be a big risk.

I've supported Giroud as much as a fan can but this season he has blown it big time, previous seasons there could be the argument that he had no competition / rest in his role, due to injuries he had to play a LOT.

You'll probably get a long, well - supported argument about «exactly what is wrong with Raw,» and detailed thoughts on how the WWE has mismanaged their biggest prospects, but it all centers around how spectacle — the thing the WWE in particular depends so much on — needs to be managed very, very carefully.

i agree andy but its not just the 4 years of hard work that should be taken into account, firstly the fai hav missed out on millions at a time where money is already tight, and more importantly the fact that given, kilbane, o shea, dunne, duff, whelan and keane may be too old when the next one comes around and for a professional footballer to hav a chance to represent his country on the biggest stage of all taken away in this manner is cruel, there can be no argument against technology when there is so much at stake as for henry being labelled a cheat i do not agree as it came at him so quick and although he in fact handled it twice i do not believe it was pre-meditated like maradonnas effort or that disgusting dive by anelka at 0 - 1... can any1 who watched the game live please tell me how lass diarra stayed on the pitch let alone avoided a yellow??

There are genuine arguments for a rapid expansion of Britain's biggest airport, as Elizabeth Truss has been making clear to politics.co.uk this week, but Yeo's tone in making them seemed as much to do with his attack on Cameron as it was to do with the issue at hand.

The point being that the biggest argument for controlling marijuana, the claim that it lead to use of worse drugs, was pretty much proven to be false, and most statisticians and researchers seem to agree on that fact today.

We believe that there are big political arguments to be had between the left and the right of politics, and the left has every reason to be confident about our values and ideas, which have done much to change Britain for the better over the last century and which are in the ascendancy internationally after three decades in which anti-government arguments have often dominated.

I have been to workshops and classes in some of the countries top studios with big name teachers and have never heard rolling up taught with as much detail as some of the arguments in this comment section.

It's easy to focus squarely on the big studios, on the faceless corporations that make up what we perceive to be Hollywood, mostly because such a surface - level argument doesn't require much thought.

The reason there is so much attention to the argument side is because this is a relatively new development (the new stuff always gets the big attention).

Unfortunately for the Big Six, however, that kind of argument probably isn't going to carry much weight with antitrust investigators at the Department of Justice (or with the European Union, which is pursuing a similar case).

Not only do they make arguments that can easily be turned against them, they also make accusations against Amazon that can be applied to the Big 5, in much bigger ways.

Doug Hoyes: So your biggest argument isn't necessarily with the potentially reputable Canadian companies, you're much more offended and you see much more damage done by the American companies that aren't really even located here.

Much criticism is given to the projections and of big (AOCGCM) models, at least some of which is based on arguments using simple, some might say simplistic, models.

As far as I know, the sceptical argument is not about volcanos alone, but about all natural atmospheric CO2 inputs / outputs, which are indeed much bigger than the anthropogenic input.

Another big problem I have with the denial camp is the refusal to refute clearly bogus arguments, e.g., that growing wine in England is proof that the medieval warm period was much warmer than it is today.

He made the point well that much of the argument about climate consists of the scientists having to refute claims made by sceptics based on minutiae without regard for the bigger picture (2008 being colder than 1998 despite the general warming trend, or corrections upwards to the temperature of a single Tasmanian weather station despite the fact overall there was no bias).