Sentences with phrase «much bigger plans»

But unbeknownst to them, the alien empire had much bigger plans — plans to access a cache of Forerunner warships that could decimate humanity.

This weekend Daimler CEO Dieter Zetsche told a German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung that it has much bigger plans in store: Daimler says it will release an electric model of a Mercedes and an electric version of its Smart Car by 2010 (via Reuters U.K.).

Hamster CEO Satoshi Hamada has much bigger plans!

A few days later, Mr. Trump ended the speculation via Twitter: «While I won't be running for governor of New York State, a race I would have won, I have much bigger plans in mind — stay tuned, will happen!»

He says it's a race he would have won, but that he has much bigger plans in mind.

«I have much bigger plans in mind — stay tuned,» he tweeted in March 2014.

Jesus was working to a much bigger plan.

I think that there might be three stages in the process: the initial bondage of works, the encounter with Godâ $ ™ s mind - blowing Grace and then the new freedom to become part of a much bigger plan because, at this point, thereâ $ ™ s nothing you want more.

When I asked about the timing, he responded that «you're going to hear some more announcements in the coming months related to the Rockaways that are specific and then thereafter you're going to see a much bigger plan... I think that's something you're going to see next year.»

Pledging to put forth a «holistic development plan» and to «undo a lot of what done wrong in the past» on Rockaway's economic development, de Blasio said that he will make «some more announcements in the coming months... that are specific and then thereafter you're going to see a much bigger plan.»

Then the truth begins to reveal itself, with Nick playing a part in a much bigger plan.

I sure want you to be encouraged as I believe this is because God has a much bigger plan for the two of you.

Not exact matches

Plus, you need to plan for long - term care expenses, as well as health care costs, both of which Ponnapalli says are big expenses that are often «not given as much importance as they deserve.»

But another source said Goldman was the «lead» participant - meaning it provided the biggest chunk of financing - and that it wasn't able to distribute as much of the loan as it initially planned because Banco Espirito Santo's finances deteriorated so rapidly.

I have investors, students paying as much as $ 675 for my office yoga curriculum and many big plans.

The big benefit from planning for taxes is twofold: You're less likely to be surprised by a tax bill and also will know how much of your earnings actually are available to you.

They generally provide better - priced plans, but ultimately such ISPs aren't doing much to discipline bigger players or change things for the better.

Now that the plan has gone bigger — with 3,000 Indiana jobs by 2023 — the overall financial incentives from the state are expected to be worth as much as nearly $ 34,000 per worker hired.

As someone who researches the impact of immigration on workers, I believe the GOP plan and ending DACA would both be big mistakes, in part because they'll make the pool of immigrants in the U.S. much less diverse.

Wiseman cautioned that the CPPIB — despite its large size in Canadian terms — competes against much bigger investors in the global market such as private equity funds, sovereign wealth funds and other public pension plans that are also on the hunt for similar types of investments.

That's because many of the so - called nonbank banks — some of the big credit - card companies and brokerage houses, for instance — have based their own business plans on growth within the entrepreneurial marketplace, in large part because that segment of the economy has been ignored by much of the banking community for years.

President Obama unveiled a fiscal stimulus plan on Thursday worth nearly US$ 450 - billion, much bigger than the US$ 300 - billion flagged.

[42:14] Tony explains the questions to ask an advisor, to ensure they're truly on your side [42:28] 60 % of people surveyed today say they believe their financial advisor is putting the company interests above their own — it's actually worse than they believe [42:45] Why Tony has chosen to support Peter and his firm, Creative Planning [43:33] How you can get a second opinion from Peter's firm, Creative Planning, through their website (www.GetASecondOpinion.com)-- it doesn't matter how much or little you have, they'll give you feedback [44:00] Tony's biggest challenge when writing his first book, and how it brought him to Peter Mallouk [44:30] Peter explains the process Creative Planning went through to open their services to people at the $ 100,000 level, and how offering this extensive range of services to people at this level is unprecedented

However, they found that the options available were too broad; either you had an executive suite where you don't really get to meet and interact with people, or you had a coworking space, which meant big open floor plans and social interaction but with too much noise and too many distractions.

people, or you had a coworking space, which meant big open floor plans and social interaction but with too much noise and too many distractions.

While I understand the COC is representing the interests of the financial services industry by opposing the Fiduciary Rule, I think their position is myopic - they should be supporting the rule to better represent their much bigger constituency of 401 (k) plan sponsors.

We met other entrepreneurs that wanted to big build companies, making it clear that we could dream much bigger than we had originally planned.

Ant Financial Services Group, the Chinese fintech giant, is planning a funding round that could fetch a valuation similar to the world's biggest and oldest banks: The digital payment company is raising as much as $ 5 billion in equity that may value it at more than $ 100 billion, according to Reuters.

Big, national employers are currently subject to only one set of health insurance regulations (federal), while small firms» plans are regulated at both the federal and state level (this is one of many reasons why individual and small group plans are so much more expensive than corporate plans).

I very much agree with what you say, but be cautious that in your very proper rejection of having «big plans» and «agendas» and «how - to promotions» that you not go diving off the opposite edge.

Because we put so much money into the house, we put off any big travel plans for another year.

I am always a guest at someone's house for the big Thanksgiving meal, so I don't get to do much planning.

I have a 2.5 year old and a husband and a full - time job, so we try to eat healthy and make simple stuff, but I find it all much easier if I plan out what I want to make for the week and make a big trip to the store on the weekend.

A much bigger focus on the eastern seaboard is planned for Paris Creek, with 75 per cent of the sales currently generated from its home base of South Australia.

We have no big plans, but I suspect we'll be watching too much football (I loathe football), drinking too much beer (bluh, give me sauvignon blanc — better yet, a gin rickey), and eating too much pumpkin pie (heavy on the whipped cream, please).

I have no plan to learn to make hard cheeses, that is a much bigger task but things like ricotta and cream cheese, even mozzarella don't look too difficult.

I've always, always had plans and strategies for an intentional career in food hidden away, and then I shy away from it all, thinking it's too big, too much right now.

very much like a lot of the successful teams in the c / l these days they might not have the big names but they have a successful organized game plan and passion, thats what gets them where they are at least, we need to be better organized in the c / l next season and go to teams with a set game plan and stick to that plan to see us through the hard games wenger need to find his tactical mojo for next season.

Against the Steelers, the plan should be to have Big Ben have to throw to win the game in the 4th while not having to throw much for the first three quarters of the game.

The Gunners, however, struggled to live up to the high pressing and high tempo game plan from their German opponents and, had it not been for some profligacy in front of goal from Klopp's frontline and midfielders, Arsenal were looking at a much bigger margin of defeat.

There is another much bigger protest planned against Kroenke, can not reveal details yet until given the all clear.

I remember the promise of moving to the bigger stadium that we would be able to compete against the very best like Madrids and Barcas, but it turned out that it was a plan to make more money and ridicule the fans as much as they can.

Now Big Sam is saying that he is planning to field a weakened side because of their Premier League commitments but I wonder how much value Wenger is putting on it.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Although I've found it very cathartic to speak, vent and end occasionally rant about all things Arsenal, we need to act carefully and intelligently right now or we're going to get played by this club even worse than at present... the pro-Wengerites and the suits, who represent a considerable proportion of the season ticket holders, don't want to believe that there is no plan and that Wenger has mailed it in for several years now or that things are going to get much worse before they get better... why would they... many have spent a considerable sum buying some of the highest priced tickets in the World... they want to have a front row seat to see something special and to be seen doing so, which simply provides ample justification for the expense and the time invested... to many of them, Wenger is the sun in their soccer universe... his awkward disposition, misplaced arrogance and his utter lack of balls makes him a rather unusual cult figure, but the cerebral narrative seemed to embolden those who already felt pretty highly of themselves... many might not even of really liked football that much before his arrival and rarely games they weren't attending... as such, they desperately believe that Wenger, and only Wenger, can supply them with their required fix... if he goes, they were wrong and that's a tough pill to swallow... they would have to admit that they were duped... they will definitely resent whoever made them feel this way, but of course it will be too late by then... so when we go overboard with ridiculous comments bordering of anarchy, it scares the shit out of them and they shift their blame towards us rather than at those who really perpetrated this act of treason... we aren't the enemy... we simply woke much earlier and the reason our comments have gotten more vile in recent years is out of utter frustration... in order for any real change to occur at this club we need to bring as many supporters as possible with us or the big money interests will fade and our ultimate objective will be lost... so it's time to focus on the head instead of the heart for now

I'm betting there will be a much bigger focus on the CL performances and losses than the fact we're 3 pts from the top... While neglecting the fact that the financial muscle they all want flexed so badly is only now a possibility due to the careful planning and years of competing with the big spenders of the league while laying the foundations for a better future.

Scum came with a game plan to fustrate us yesterday none of our players played bad and none played really great but was a good team performance but I think it suprised us how much lack of ambition they had even palace had more ambition wen they came to us their bus was even bigger then Chelsea's COYG

I very much doubt that Real would pursue Sanchez unless they were contemplating moving Bale, planning to play Ronaldo centrally this season and willing to upset their delicate wage structure... of course anything is possible, but this appears to be unlikely... the bigger question is the fact that Wenger was willing to risk losing the first few games of the season because he hasn't settled the Sanchez dilemma in a timely fashion... no one believes he was too injured to play so this is not too dissimilar from the Liverpool game last season, except for the fact that Sanchez was in street clothes and not in his warm - ups (much like Coutinho for Liverpool today)... we're existing in such a fragile environment because of Wenger and Kroenke... in the game yesterday, when Leicester scored to make it 3 - 2, you could cut the tension with a knife... can you imagine just for a second what the reaction might have been if we had failed to score in the last 10 minutes

My fellow gunners Wenger is a failure either you admit or not, though this is a preseason match which is less important just to make the players gain fitness, before the competitive matches commence, but at the same time Wenger's tactics and formation should be questioned especially against big teams, he had conceded numerous goals against big teams in which today's match is a reflection of what we are talking about, his old and out dated philosophy is no longer valid in modern football, no wonder Alexis Sanchez can't confide in his plans to propel the team in winning major honours, Wenger still believe in some of the bunch of fringe players he should have gotten rid of in the team and replace them with world class players or players that are hungry for success like Alexis, anyway there is still much time in the transfer window presently to do that, if he can change the hands of time and stop being too stubborn.

Which of these two is the most unlikely to happen might seem obvious, with my plan having at least two big obstacles in the way, but I would not put any more money on Arsenal signing this highly priced and much sought after striker.