Sentences with phrase «much character left»

The statement he made is a statement one makes if they believe they are likely to be found guilty and want to get through the process with as much character left intact as possible.

Not exact matches

Something about the young Lakita character reminded me so much of a little girl I met named Bharathi, who is pictured above on the left.

On the other hand, however, it must be said that Just because of its special character spirituality must be left much freedom to realize itself in an individual way which can not be commanded and institutionalized.

«39 The present writer has found great inspiration, much truth, wisdom, and beauty, fervent witness to the numinous character of ultimate reality in the great Hindu writings through the ages, and hopes to learn still more from them; but he can not agree with Radhakrishnan's conclusion that «Jesus» own testimony, philosophical truth and religious experience alike demand that He should be brought in line with the other great saints of God, who has not left himself without a witness in any clime or age.

Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibimuch better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibiMuch more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility

Let's get the facts straight here.He never demanded # 400,000 a week.All that is just media talk.However, I support your point of the fact that him going does not mean disaster.We've survived with far better players leaving you know.If Arsenal had replaced Van Persie the season he left we would've challenged them for the title that season.However, at that time we were financially poor and had to settle for some second rate players.Now we are in a better financial position and I expect us to be more ambitious and that involves trying as much as possible to replace any player who leaves.This doom prediction doesn't show the character of a top club.Even Chelsea won't behave like how we do if they lost Hazard.I hate the way Arsenal allows players to treat it.I actually thought only smaller clubs behaved that way.

I have tons of great memories of visiting Disneyland starting when I was five (when, much to my parents horror, I apparently spent most of my time pointing at costumed characters and other features and declaring them fake) and up through when I left for college.

Remember, even Churchill could manage a «tweet - sized» soundbite: «Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few» still leaves you with 66 out of 140 characters to play with.

There is too much time spent trying to setup characters that don't need it, which leaves little time to focus on an exciting and thrilling story.

I understand these exist to illustrate the character's insular, lonely existence, but they nearly exist in isolation; without much else to give the movie life, we're left with tedium.

I don't mind short games but at two hours (including puzzle solving) the game doesn't leave much room for storytelling, character and world building, compelling puzzles, or much of anything really.

There are some characters missing from the final battle, which in the book was pretty much a review of every living person left in the series, but seeing old standbys like schoolmates Seamus and Dean Jordan are a welcome connection to the series» history.

What the criticisms that center on McCandless» naïveté and the insensitivity he shows to those he left behind misses, however, is that despite what some would see as flaws in character, the story being told is still a remarkable one, and the way Penn chooses to portray it actually enhances the story, rending much of it unforgettable.

Characters come and go quickly, leaving a feeling that there is too much compression of the multi-episode story.

Spielberg leaves too much on the table between the two characters, especially in a film that earns the right to breathe for a few seconds, but Streep shines in these scenes all the same — this is Spielberg's first female - driven film since «The Color Purple» in 1985, and the actress is eager to make up for lost time.

Much of the second act involves a character having to leave the cage to grab something and worrying about the shark appearing out of nowhere.

Dull and pointless, Johnny Depp plays a far to run of the mill boring character for his acting style and the sub-par scares won't raise anything apart from your anguish at how much longer of the film is left.

Even with that said, it also offers a gripping story revolving around the main character and religion, that left much to be interpreted and theorized, yet kept me interested throughout the game.

To be so meditative on characters going about their business, little is actually said by Matthews, as writer, due to very limited extensiveness, if not focal unevenness, that leave development to fail in distinguishing the characters all that much, making it harder to become invested in them.

O'Connell is strong in the role, but since his character is often left to suffer alone, there's only so much he can do to connect with an audience.

As said, the acting is superb, especially Ruffalo and Dern, but Krause's character gets left behind big time, and the kids that are treasured so much by the characters as well as the story in general get next to no development, which isn't good when you consider the film's emotionally heavy climax.

Still, the movie's central story did not provide much for character development even with a 2.5 hour run time and, the end of the movie will leave most people disappointed compared to previous installments.

As a UC Berkeley engineering major named Ryan, Prinze doesn't act so much as just speak while being filmed, leaving his entire character to be defined merely by the fact that he wears two watches.

With required action sequences, tie - ins to other Marvel appearances and characters, not to mention world - building and development of the hero, only so much time is left to spend on the villain.

That leaves us with our final major player, George (Donald Holden), the sort - of title character (his last name is not Washington, but he does dream of being president) who doesn't really say much at all.

Admittedly, he sounds nothing like the actual Edward Snowden (what was the point in putting on a much deeper voice), but he expresses that mental inner turmoil and anxiety to perfection, leaving us with a real - life character that is consistently intriguing to watch.

As much as «Everest» trades in a kind of authenticity, it also trucks in the most banal of disaster movie clichés; for instance, one of the principal characters in the trek is leaving behind a pregnant wife.

Despite his enduring role in pop culture, numerous attempts to do the Hulk justice on screen have left fans more angry than the Green Goliath himself and Marvel's only attempt to build a solo movie around the character didn't fare much better.

Gosling's character pretty much picks up where he left off in Drive, playing an emotionless badass with few words, trading hobbies of driving for boxing.

We're basically watching Paul Rudd play Paul Rudd, and while you could do a lot worse when it comes to a lead character, it doesn't leave much of an impression when it comes to a superhero origin story.

All of the characters are shocked when they hear how much the other person makes, but equally as shocking is how little they have left of it.

There is so darn much setup that it leaves no room for impulses to run free, so Confetti lacks the outlandish giddiness that comes from great improvisational comedy, but it's also missing the benefits of scripted film - like character development or storylines that are brought to a satisfying conclusion.

As Andrea Riseborough's character never leaves this base in the sky, Cruise is left to act pretty much by himself.

There's no master recipe list so you're left to experiment every single time, and there really isn't much of a need to do it at all because the odd quests that you get from characters don't often ask for items that need to be synthesized.

Plotless and episodic, it depicts a few lazy summer days in the life of its perpetually bemused title character (memorably embodied by Julianne Côté), whose parents are on vacation, leaving herself and her much older brother, Rémi (Marc - André Grondin) to fend for themselves.

Although the settings and the casts of characters change, these aren't stories that begin and end so much as lives that we partake of for a time and then take our leave of, cups of water snatched from an ever - flowing river.

For the sake of letting everyone experience the movie as I did without knowing too much going in I have purposely left out a lot of detail regarding the story and the additional characters.

The meta - level layering and critical dialogue about horror movies in this sequence (characters with little to no development, predictable scare setups, and shocking turns that don't make much sense) are calls for variation that Kevin Williamson's script leave largely unanswered once the plot proper kicks into gear.

Desperation and exhaustion make it difficult for the trekkers to work up much in the way of characters or conflicts, and while that no doubt spares us many cliches, we are left during their long walk with too much of a muchness.

However, not a single one of them, the director or any of the writers, has any prior experience, leaving the character actors with little but to ham up each scene as much as possible to try to give us some indication that things are going on, and that what is going on is supposed to be funny.

Fortunately, the movie gets much better once its hero lands in prison, and ideas and rhetoric — most of it supplied by the Autobiography — fill in some of the various cavities in the screen left by the period, settings, and characters.

Much of the underlying thematic weight of the movie, then, is left to the narration, as Allen explains the characters» doubts and realizations without allowing the characters themselves a means to show these moments (Eisenberg and Stewart are charming in spite of their characters» lack of development).

The actors give as much as the script allows, with Charlize Theron (Young Adult) as crafty Meredith Vickers, Michael Fassbender (Shame) as sinister David, and Noomi Rapace (The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo) as the daydreaming scientist definitely help flesh out characters at a time when others are left to flap about with little to do.

Larraín's filmmaking style is so calm and unsensational — shabby even, much like the grizzled protagonist and his troupe — that moments of sexual explicitness, homicidal violence and transgressive outrage barely register, leaving viewers feeling as numb to it all as the characters themselves.

What has lacked in our day of cinema that can leave much to be desired is simple character development.

I can see by all the other reviews that I'm dramatically in the minority here but if a teen drama around terminal illness is what you're looking for on a Sunday afternoon, then 2014's «The Fault in Our Stars» is much more deserving of your time with characters you'll actually care about and a story that will leave you thinking about life and how to make the most of it long after the end credits have rolled.

But for those who haven't seen much of Yelchin beyond the multiplex, he leaves behind a treasure trove of vivid character work.

Unfortunately I can't speak too much about this great character without giving too much away about the movie, so I will leave it at that this is another great performance and I now have put Control at the top of the «to - watch» list for this weekend.

The filmmaker isn't so much interested in Aryan as in what he represents, but that leaves a void at the centre of the movie where a fully developed character should be.

Based on a novel by Tim Tharp, the movie looks like any number of party - time high school movies, but burrows much deeper into its characters and situations, leaving a satisfyingly complex portrait of a guy you might actually know.