I do not have
much commentary other that to point you to Simon F's comment from the last post on this.
Not exact matches
Critic and Kazan interviewer / biographer Jeff Young appears to be the only one of the principal participants (save Bouzereau, naturally) seated before the film as it unspools, though he does not, as the
others do not, offer
much in the way of scene - specific
commentary.
Blu - ray Highlight: There are a number of great extras to choose from (including one of the funnier blooper reels and a cool feature called Disney Intermission where the Muppets perform short gags and tease
other bonus material whenever you pause the movie), but the
commentary with director James Bobin and co-writers Jason Segel and Nicholas Stoller is too
much fun to ignore.
First up is an audio
commentary with director Daniel Attias, moderated by Michael Felsher, which goes over
much of Attais» involvement with the production, as well as his
other film and TV work.
They give good
commentary, chatting about this and that without leaving
much in the way of dead air, and the fact that the conversation frequently ranges way beyond Chopping Mall to consider
other films and pop - culture markers from the era (programmable robot toys, FANGORIA magazine, the long, slow demise of Radio Shack) is frankly a relief given the sheer quantity of content here.
On the Criterion blog «On Five,» DVD producer Kim Hendrickson writes about working with Bertolucci on preparing their lavish four - disc edition and Bertolucci's remark that the longer TV version «in my opinion is not
much different from the
other one, just a little bit more boring...» According to the
commentary track on the disc, the TV version was actually completed first and then Bertolucci continued to pare down and shape the film to his ultimate version.
I understood the social
commentary of the film, but I thought
other movies such as They Live did a
much better job at conveying the concept of governmental fear, media brainwashing, and poverty stricken hope.
Other special mentions must also be given to Yorgos Lanthimos» The Killing of a Sacred Deer (a film I
much preferred to his previous, and equally - divisive output), David Lowery's thoughtful and bravely - constructed A Ghost Story, and finally — perhaps disagreeably so to some of its admirers — Jordan Peele's Get Out, which I felt was an entertaining yet inferior social
commentary to similar of the past such as The Wicker Man, Funny Games and Kill List.
It makes for a
much more lively experience than a lot of
other commentary tracks.
There's a rich vein of social
commentary in The Mangler (just as there was in Englund's
other masquerade ball, A Nightmare on Elm Street), most of it dealing with the Industrial Revolution and small - town castes like those found in King's The Eyes of the Dragon and «Dark Tower» series, but it's buried deep and it's unlikely there's
much value in mining it out.
Mike Ross, Justin Wong, Gootecks and
other famous players within the FGC provide some worthwhile
commentary on the community they support so
much.
Investors have been worried that Fortnite, made by privately held Epic Games, is eating away at engagement for
other titles, and management didn't offer too
much commentary in that regard.
Commentary from artists such as Julie Ault, Andrea Bowers, Jim Hodges, Mike Kelley, and Pae White, among
others, does
much to argue for Kent's influence on various trajectories of contemporary art production, especially those that investigate the malleability of language, appropriate popular and commercial imagery, and foment activism.
The Nature
commentary by Penner et al. on which this argument is based actually says that on top of the global warming caused by carbon dioxide,
other short - lived pollutants (such as methane and black carbon) cause an additional warming approximately 65 % as
much as CO2, and
other short - lived pollutants (such as aerosols) also cause some cooling.
A disconcerting feature of
much commentary here and in
other blogs is the relentless refrain claiming that the «climate system is chaotic.»
If you only present your own evidence without acknowledging
other evidence, I would suggest that you epitomize the hypocrisy that tends to discredit so
much blog
commentary.
That is commendable, but there is seldom room for
much of that within thread
commentary and often inadequate room even in the original post — at best, the participant can link to
other sources with the requisite detail.
There will be
other commentaries, written by better writers than me (see links), on this Senate report so there is no point in me going into
much detail here.
They very
much condemn
other nations, whose laws, together with the
commentaries on them, swell up to so many volumes; for they... [more]
In
other words, there's an elitist tone to
much of the negative
commentary.