Sentences with phrase «much concentration goes»

Not exact matches

My daughter's behaviour and concentration increased immeasurably when we went gluten free, she no longer has tantrums and is a much happier, healthier child.

«For example, [measuring] chlorophyll a will give you information about how much biological activity is going on, and eventually more information about the concentration of carbon dioxide within the ocean and the atmosphere,» said Yoshihisa Shirayama, executive director of research at the Japan Agency for Marine - Earth Science and Technology in Tokyo.

To assess the influence of phosphorus on nitrogen removal, the researchers used a comparative approach — they examined the differences between how much nitrogen goes into lakes and how much comes out downstream — coupled with time - series analyses of nitrogen and phosphorus concentration in large lakes.

So, we're talking about this period 3.5 million years ago, this is the middle Pleistocene, and that's where the CO2 concentrations were round about 400 ppm; and if we want to look at CO2 concentrations considerably higher than that, we're going to go much deeper in time, and then we're really going into periods where sea level was even higher.

Wray says the new evidence for water is an encouraging development in the search for life, but he points out that there is much we still don't know — «how deep the water goes, how low the temperature gets and how high the salt concentration gets.

In response, the cells underwent changes indicative of senescence, ceasing cell division and churning out key SASP factors.7 Notably, astrocytes were much more vulnerable to paraquat than skin cells: astrocytes went senescent at a lower concentration of the toxin than was required for skin cells, and the doses that turned skin cells senescent killed astrocytes outright.7

While similar in color and flavor to soy sauce, we go for tamari because it's gluten - free, and thanks to the higher concentration of fermented soy beans, is thicker and richer so you will need to use much less.

: But even then, once we talked like — we talked all the time, digestion of those foods is probably not very good and the concentration of those is gonna be much less as opposed to a grass - fed beef.

Because compounds absorbed vaginally do not pass through the liver first, this also means they go into the bloodstream in much higher concentrations than if they were ingested.

Alas, Jacob's news spreads like wildfire, and this film, which was directed with much passion by Frank Beyer from Holocaust survivor Jurek Becker's script, goes on to reveal what a double - edged sword hope can be when it is after all false and when the threat of deportation to concentration camps is constant.

It would be useful to have an artificial concentration of those technologies in a teacher education program... with the anticipation that using those technologies in an environment in which they can be reflective is going to prepare teachers in a much more impactful way than when they are in an environment with less opportunity to reflect.

The amount of concentration it required was evident, even as he did his best to hide how much effort was going into each step, but by the last few he was making it look easy.

Overall, non-college goers did much better in the labor market if they had completed high - level math and science courses; earned average to above average grades; completed multiple vocational courses focusing on a specific labor market area (occupational concentration); and obtained a professional certification or license.

The concentration of HCO3 — goes up a bit, but there is so much HCO3 — that the relative change in HCO3 — is smaller than the changes are for CO2 and CO32 -.

The airborne contamination doesn't much change the existing amount on the ground (it goes up and then comes back down) but, as previously noted, it might disperse over greater distances, albeit at lower concentrations because of dilution.]

As we have seen from the studies I cited to ChE, some may be going to increased plant photosynthesis resulting from the higher atmospheric concentration, but I have seen no overall quantification of how much this might be.

WAIS is much the more seriously prone to melting; it'll be gone in a few millennia with CO2 concentrations now those prevailing during the Miocene.

The radiative forcing generated by CO2 change goes as the logarithm of the concentration, and thus removing the whole CO2 inventory would generate a much larger impact than had you doubled it.

As these SRM techniques are also largely unproven, require a mostly peaceful world to be deployed in, require the bending of judiciary systems, may backfire climatologically and do «nothing» [considering ocean temperature feedbacks they actually do do something] to abate ocean acidification — the simple notion that it is cheap [again, policy thinking] makes geoengineering so dangerous, possibly undermining cooperation behind the world's mitigation attempts, under the UNFCCC, the hard route that we need to go anyway * [as CDR geoengineering lacks the potential to get carbon concentrations back to safe levels, also for marine life — and isn't much cheaper / is costlier anyway].

This is the main reason that I think projections of extreme atmospheric concentrations (say > 650 PPM) are implausible; there just is not enough economically recoverable fossil fuel available to maintain 650 PPM in the atmosphere for very long, never mind go much over 650 PPM.

... Drawdown is the point in time when greenhouse gas concentrations peak in the atmosphere and begin to go down on a year - to - year basis... I hadn't thought about solutions much until I saw the wedges, in 2001.

But even taking these into account, there is no doubt that «going nuclear» would result in a slower increase in CO2 concentrations, maybe by as much as 80 ppmv by 2100, which translates into averted warming of around 0.6 C at the arguably exaggerated IPCC AR4 2xCO2 ECS of 3.2 C (or half this amount at the more recent estimates for ECS).

We really ought to be trying to stabilise much closer to 400 and therefore doing it right now and aggressively, while attempting reforestation, massive algae - based sequestration etc so that perhaps by 2100 we could have concentrations in sharp decline but I accept that that is simply not going to happen.

What they can not easily do, however, is perpetuate a trend in those concentrations, because they themselves go up and down over much shorter timescales than the long term trajectory from preindustial days to today.

The research was conducted in the UK; The scientists started by measuring how much air pollution go into a certain number of houses in Lancaster using dust monitoring devices and by swiping surfaces and then analyzing what was collected with magnetic remanence, a technique that provides information on concentrations of iron - bearing particles.

It is also because there is much more water vapor in the atmosphere than CO2 and, since the amount of climate forcing goes approximately logarithmically with concentration that means the concentration of water vapor has to change by a significantly larger ABSOLUTE amount to produce the same effect.

As far as # 2 goes, ice core data is used for recent paleoclimate data on CO2 concentration, nothing much earlier than about 1000 years ago, because of the errors inherent in the ice core data.