Sentences with phrase «much conjecture on»

There is much conjecture on how the Maya developed such an accurate calendar.

Not exact matches

Just a disclaimer about my post above: When I start talking about PsychWarOps and go off on a rant — that's pretty much just conjecture on my part.

There are no long - term research studies on the outcome of children with Selective Mutism as they grow into adulthood, and therefore much of what we believe occurs in adulthood for this population is conjecture by experts with experience in the field.

While Helfgott's proof does not solve the full conjecture, which is considered much harder, it shines a light on the intricate dance prime numbers engage in.

Due to the fact that there is so much conjecture around what constitutes a «high - histamine food,» if you went on a low - histamine diet you would be cutting out a lot of food — and you might not be doing your body any good.

We also can conjecture, for instance, that Spider - Man doesn't ultimately have much of an impact on the plot because the actual Spider - Man movie will eventually come from Sony, not Disney.

Although the evidence is mounting that expanding instructional time will result in real learning gains, evidence on the costs of extending the school year is much scarcer and involves a good deal of conjecture.

An SD card slot on top of the added built - in storage might have cost too much, Baker conjectured.

On the CPU side, there's been much conjecture that Scorpio would feature AMD's new Ryzen technology - something we thought unlikely, owing to manufacturing timelines, not to mention Microsoft telling us last year that the new console would feature eight CPU cores.

Even in mathematics, which is much more exact than the other sciences, since it builds on immutable axioms and the rules of logic, there are numerous conjectures that are believed to be true, but for which a stringent and in itself conclusive mathematical proof is missing.

Not much for me to add to the follow - up by other posters other than a) to point out the obvious that RC and quite a number of other sites already do a stellar job of presenting broad, interactive straight talk on climate and b) offer a little conjecture on my part.

The biggest error of all the errors in the physics of the radiative greenhouse conjecture is that they «explain» the surface temperature of 288K using Stefan - Boltzmann calculations based on the direct solar radiation PLUS about TWICE as much supposed thermal energy input from the colder atmosphere.

The authors acknowledged that much of their book is pure and simple conjecture but defended their arguments by pointing out that many of their ideas are already taking root — autopilots on planes and ships and cars telling drivers to change the oil or slow down.

Imagine how much better you will interview with someone by your side helping you define what your value is and how this get this across to interviewers and decision makers who may look at you as a little long in the tooth, or not as up to date on modern business strategies and technologies based solely on conjecture about your age.