In this connection, I have been particularly struck by Gustavo Gutiérrez's observation that, whereas
much contemporary theology seeks to respond to the challenge of the «nonbeliever» who questions our «religious world» as Christians, in a continent like Latin America the primary challenge comes to us rather from the «nonperson» who questions us about our «economic, social, political and cultural world.»
Much contemporary theology has been attempting to undo the assimilation of the idea of God into that of a controlling and dictatorial power.
Not exact matches
If the tendency of
contemporary theology is to give too
much to Justin and the efficacy of rational thought, the tendency of postmodern
theology is to give too
much to Tertullian and the irrational.
The argument is that the Chicago school arose in the context of the social gospel, a movement that had
much in common with
contemporary political
theology and that, under the stimulus of political
theology, this school can recover something of what it had lost as well as move forward in new ways.
But for the most part the actual content of those repeated lines are not bad
theology —
much of
contemporary «praise music» is in fact a revival of psalmody.
So
much contemporary spirituality, ranging from the pantheism of «Gaia» environmentalism to the process
theology and panentheism of some Catholic schools of thought, presume some variant or other of this view.
(Theism of the Second Type;
much contemporary Protestant
theology, doctrines of a «finite - infinite» or perfect - perfectible God.)
Much modem
theology is of the opinion that
contemporary meaning is largely uncontrolled by and different from biblical meaning.
As
much as this ethic is needed, as
much as we are all indebted to the new clarifications which have come from the
contemporary ethics of virtue and character, and as
much as we must never lose its accomplishments, the new practical
theologies must strive for something more rigorous.
Fuller recognition of this fact might give a more constructive turn to
much of
contemporary theology.
The biblical appeal of the
contemporary theologies of liberation has once more given occasion to fulfill the promise of John Robinson that «the Lord has yet
much more light and truth to break forth from his holy word.»
Commitment to change without abandonment of the cultural achievements of the past seems to be characteristic of
much of
contemporary theology.
Whatever answer one may give, we may at least acknowledge that Catholic
theology can not afford to ignore the problems that have given rise to the disaffection with revelation
theology in
much contemporary secular and Christian thought.
It has had the effect of bringing
contemporary theology in general to the recognition that the kingdom of God must be in some sense present, however
much it may be regarded as future also.
The lack of the authenticating thread for genuine natural law - the nonnegotiable insistence that there are some universally valid precepts derivable by nature and unable not to be known (however
much we are tempted to overlook them or pretend we do not know them)» is most clearly evident in the sections of each chapter where Porter sketches what
contemporary moral
theology can discover from her medieval labors.
If I were choosing recent books in this area which most deserve to be read outside the country, I would start with Oliver O'Donovan's political
theology in The Desire of the Nations; John Milbank's critique of the social sciences in Theology and Social Theory; Timothy Gorringe's provocative political reading of Karl Barth in Karl Barth: Against Hegemony; Peter Sedgwick's The Market Economy and Christian Ethics; Michael Banner's Christian Ethics and Contemporary Moral Problems; Duncan Forrester's Christian Justice and Public Policy; and Timothy Jenkins's Religion in Everyday Life: An Ethnographic Approach, which argues with a dense interweaving of theory and empirical study for a social anthropological approach to English religion which has learned much from t
theology in The Desire of the Nations; John Milbank's critique of the social sciences in
Theology and Social Theory; Timothy Gorringe's provocative political reading of Karl Barth in Karl Barth: Against Hegemony; Peter Sedgwick's The Market Economy and Christian Ethics; Michael Banner's Christian Ethics and Contemporary Moral Problems; Duncan Forrester's Christian Justice and Public Policy; and Timothy Jenkins's Religion in Everyday Life: An Ethnographic Approach, which argues with a dense interweaving of theory and empirical study for a social anthropological approach to English religion which has learned much from t
Theology and Social Theory; Timothy Gorringe's provocative political reading of Karl Barth in Karl Barth: Against Hegemony; Peter Sedgwick's The Market Economy and Christian Ethics; Michael Banner's Christian Ethics and
Contemporary Moral Problems; Duncan Forrester's Christian Justice and Public Policy; and Timothy Jenkins's Religion in Everyday Life: An Ethnographic Approach, which argues with a dense interweaving of theory and empirical study for a social anthropological approach to English religion which has learned
much from
theologytheology.
They discover in the vast resources of divine disinterest a freedom and a joy that cut through
much of
contemporary pop
theology.
Among
contemporary theologians, John B. Cobb, Jr., Professor Emeritus at the School of
Theology at Claremont and the founding director of the Center for Process Studies, has contemplated the place of nature in theology as much as any other major
Theology at Claremont and the founding director of the Center for Process Studies, has contemplated the place of nature in
theology as much as any other major
theology as
much as any other major thinker.