How can any Christian argue with
much conviction against capital punishment if God effects his purpose in such an unwaveringly bloody way?
Not exact matches
My
convictions against many of their ideas, and those of many other bands I used to love, was
much greater than my appreciation of the music.
My contention is that this places Ivan's sensibility
much nearer to the authentic vision of the New Testament than are many of the more pious and conventional forms of Christian
conviction today The gospel of the ancient church was always one of rebellion
against those principalities and powers — death chief among them — that enslave and torment creation; nowhere does the New Testament rationalize evil or accord it necessity or treat it as part of the necessary fabric of God's world.
Our protest
against «the naked public square» was then a distinctly minority position, whereas today there is a
much more widespread recognition that church - state jurisprudence is a shambles, and that the democratic process requires the vigorous engagement of the religiously based moral
convictions of the American people.
He has also done
much work on injustice issues, including campaigning
against the wrongful
conviction of the Guildford Four.
I think people can really only judge your level of analysis &
conviction against whether you actually own a stock — and, of course, by how
much stock you own!
There is so - oooo
much fuzziness regarding what was actually decided: What constitutes a «closely held» corporation; how is a «sincere» religious belief determined, and by who; who speaks for the
convictions of the corporation; and Obamacare aside, what if said religious belief calls for discrimination
against blacks, gays and / or women?