Sentences with phrase «much debate on this issue»

After much debate on the issue, in August 2014, Justice Paul Perell of the Ontario Superior Court ordered the destruction of IAP records following a 15 - year retention period, a decision Shapiro heralded as important to maintain the promise of confidentiality given to IAP claimants.

Not exact matches

There has been much debate about how blockchain could solve this problem, but a recent Newsweek report detailing the example of a home title being issued on the Ethereum blockchain showed a solution: It's only a matter of time, the article said, before government agencies start embracing blockchain as a valid alternative to existing title processes.

A paper co-authored by University of Ottawa Professor Michael Wolfson, one of Canada's top researchers on income and equality issues, said there was much debate of Ottawa's new program this year allowing some income splitting for couples with children, but most people don't realize income splitting has long existed for thousands of professionals such as doctors and lawyers who have been able to funnel their incomes through private companies they create to hold their income.

The most important labor debate in the country right now isn't the minimum wage issue that President Obama spent so much time on in his SOTU speech this week.

Leaving aside the humble self - deprecation of the final comment, the post does touch on an important issue which is much debated at the moment.

I would much rather see us continue to focus on the major issues of Reformed thought in an admittedly pluralistic denomination than get into the debates that seem inevitably to arise when evangelicals have established their own «pure» denominations.

Much of the debate about the Church and power conflicts now going on in many American cities seems very familiar because it is a replay of discussions in which I was involved in the 1930's when the chief issue was the relation of the churches to the labor movement in its early struggles to achieve...

They need to be able to explain to members what is happening in processes of debate and resolution; and to do that in the midst of an often emotional give - and - take is much more difficult than preparing a sermon on a social issue.

Much modern intellectual debate, particularly within the popular arena, centers on disputes between religion and science over such seminal issues as creationism versus evolutionary theory, or theological explanations of the origin of the universe versus the «big - bang theory» of the new cosmology.

To describe the Church as a community of memory and hope, sharing in the common memory not only of Jesus Christ but also of the mighty deeds of God known by Israel, expecting the coming into full view of the kingdom on earth and / or in heaven; to describe it further as the community of worship, united by its direction toward one God, who is Father, Son and Holy Spirit yet worshipped more as Father or as Son or as Holy Spirit in this or that part of the community; to describe it as a community of thought in which debate and conflict can take place because there is a fundamental frame of agreement and because there are common issues of great import — to do all this and the much more that needs to be done would be to essay the work of a large part of theology.

Much of the debate about the Church and power conflicts now going on in many American cities seems very familiar because it is a replay of discussions in which I was involved in the 1930's when the chief issue was the relation of the churches to the labor movement in its early struggles to achieve power.

Thus, Griffin, McHenry, and Cobb can debate the panpsychism issue with Ford, and among themselves, without having to fear that their respective interpretations of Whitehead's metaphysics — interpretations on which ride much of their respective philosophies or theologies — will be found wanting in any important respect.

As much, perhaps, as any other church - state question, the issue of religious symbols on public property has generated increasing concern and debate within the American Jewish community in recent years.

Issue 14 October 2015 In the latest issue of Inside Food magazine we look at the debate over the levels of salt in popcorn, how the industry is adapting to consumers on grain free diets and much Issue 14 October 2015 In the latest issue of Inside Food magazine we look at the debate over the levels of salt in popcorn, how the industry is adapting to consumers on grain free diets and much issue of Inside Food magazine we look at the debate over the levels of salt in popcorn, how the industry is adapting to consumers on grain free diets and much more.

There were also issues around responsibility — we have had debates around whether young fathers are taking on enough responsibility and how much they are culpable for the fact that they don't get the same access to services as mums do.»

So much so, that after that debate Mr Burley reportedly faced a «barrage» of four - lettered abuse from those who disagreed with his take on the issue.

There is much debate about whether the Conservative pledge to hold an in / out referendum on the EU will win votes from UKIP, or whether UKIP supporters are more concerned with other issues such as immigration.

It turned out there is not much exciting about the Lib Dems debating Trident, an issue on which the party is staggeringly united.

This is supposedly based on standard «self defense» war doctrine which is recognized by United Nations, although specific legal issues are subject to much debating and frequently are more a matter of opinion than law.

When I pressed by pointing out that the issue has very much been in the news recently, and that Gillibrand would almost certainly invite a debate on the topic, Long elaborated a bit.

Rob Astorino is currently challenging Gov. Andrew Cuomo to debates, but Hawkins has a much different perspective on the issues than either Cuomo or Astorino, who tend to agree on conservative economic issues.

We made a point of trying to get away from the campaign to cover the choice: the 6 and 10 did a series on big issues, from airports to defence spending to social care, that weren't getting much play in the campaign; Newsnight interrogated the future of the NHS; Andrew Neil's series of Daily Politics debates analysed policy, department by department over two weeks; and, online, from Reality Check to constituency profiles, we scrutinised the detail.

In a heated Commons debate on the issue last night, the party's shadow communities secretary Andrew Gwynne admitted that Labour need to do «much more work» to tackle anti-Semitism and vowed: «No political party has the monopoly on vice or virtue but we will put our house in order.»

Yet much of the document in fact focused on the debatable desirability of the goals of synthetic biology, and on the need to acknowledge the complexities and uncertainties involved in designing novel living organisms — issues which concern many of those working in synthetic biology and which can and should be the subject of open debate.

A coalition of 16 science and environmental groups, including the Union of Concerned Scientists, issued a joint statement praising the assessment, while others said it provided much - needed context for sticky debates on Capitol Hill and in statehouses across the land.

The so - called GM debate has shed much heat but very little light on these issues, which surely must be top of the agenda for the 21st century.»

Nothing can be stated for sure at this point, except that there will be much more future debate on the issue.

I'm a a tad late to the party (debate) on the candles: all wicks n waxes!!!! The truth is there is always going to be a «they said, they said» issue... All waxes have or contain naturally occurring, usually mild toxins, burning anything will pollute your environment - I am a bit of a hippie & have been making candles (I prefer soy, beeswax & blending the two) the pure essential natural fragrances I use can be extremely harmful when incorrectly used (too much) or even the natural soaps I have started making the wrong amounts of fragrance & «natural» preservatives used can cause serious skin & health issues... I use all natural cleaning products, I will start to make my own soon (again a little more research & I'm good to go) for example Spagnham moss is a brilliant disinfectant 100 % natural) and yet so strong even slightly inhaled can cause breathing issues!!!

Speaking to MPs on 16 September, Wilshaw claimed that too much time is spent debating structures rather than the bigger issue of capacity within the English school system, calling for a debate on how to ensure more good people are brought in.

Given the statute's scope, today's debate could include countless issues, such as possible changes to Title II rules on educator effectiveness, the expansion of the charter school grant program, the introduction of a private school choice initiative, reconsideration of competitive grant programs (RTTT, TIF, i3), and much more.

As much as empirical challenges may seem to render this debate theoretical, it is a critical one for policy: the authority to issue federal guidance to schools on discipline disparities comes directly from administrative authority to enforce the Civil Rights Act, which requires either different treatment or disparate intent.

Much of this debate has centered on the issue of theory versus practice.

The debate in Newark did not center as much on the issues of testing and the Common Core standards that roil many suburban school districts.

You have in your packet a blue sheet that gives you the order of the day, so I won't belabor that too much, but I will just remind you that we're going to start out with a session on history this morning; then go to a lunchtime segment that will focus on some of the relevant federal constitutional issues, including evaluations of the federal attacks on and defenses of the Blaine amendments; then we will finish off the day with a session that will focus on litigation strategy related to these amendments and some of the arguments being made for and against them in that litigation, as well as a focus on how debates over faith - based initiatives and school vouchers are affected by these particular state constitutional restrictions.

Alas, we didn't have a chance to get into the patent on the «used digital content» issue, although this was a heavily debated theme at a TOC Executive Roundtable on Monday — not so much the Amazon patent but the work of ReDigi as a marketplace for such content.

-LSB-...] Barry Eisler has been tirelessly outspoken on these issues, most recently in a much - debated exchange with Trident Media's Robert Gottlieb, as I mentioned last week in «Our «Bifurcating Future.

In addition, our data shows that the common refrain that active doesn't stand a chance versus passive index funds and ETFs is not true, and the focus on the active - passive debate often obscures the much more important issues of good savings habits, appropriate asset allocation, and taking a long - term view.

Following news that the Environment Food and Rural Affairs (EFRA) Committee has recommended that Defra extends the law on dangerous dogs to cover dog attacks that injure a protected animal, which would include cats, Cats Protection has issued the following statement: «We very much welcome this recommendation and are pleased that the issue was raised in yesterday's House of Commons debate,» explained Jacqui Cuff, Cats...

Although I don't know how the hostess picks themes or manages to manage things, in my brief experience with the blog, you are much more likely to find a sensible and creative discussion of how to actually address the issue (global warming, sustainability, and related matters of living well within our environment) on the family, local, or cultural levels than you are to find a large acrimonious debate among (often anonymous) people.

«The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change, a Guide to the Debate» by Andrew Dessler and Edward Parson (Cambridge, 2006) is more comprehensive, gives a better - rounded brief treatment of each issue, is much better on the extra science issues, and more thoughtful than the books in Gavin's review, as good as they are.

I think it's fair to say that the Democratic leadership let us down and didn't fight as hard as they should, or with as much parliamentary skill as necessary, but still, flat out it was Republican obstructionism that killed this bill and killed all substantive debate on the issues.

As long as we disagree so much on the core issues, there is ENOUGH to debate withot dragging proxies in.

If our hostess really hopes to have a forum where scientists on opposite sides of the CAGW debate can discuss the really important issues, then I would suggest that we need a much better level of participation from the proponents of CAGW.

When you talk about «well financed» forces impacting the debate and trying to hide the truth, you should be talking about all of the university professors collecting millions in government grant money to «study the issue»... do you think they will ever come out and say there really isn't much impact on the world wide temperatures, which would cut off their well financed research and incomes???

How much better it would have been had you chosen to present a proper debate, with AAAS scientists (e.g., Lindzen of MIT or Freeman Dyson) on both sides of the issue.

The way people vote can depend on much more than just the issues being debated scientists have found.

Nonetheless, with the passage of time, Pope Francis has seemed to take an ever more decided stance behind the notion of manmade global warming, while sending signals that there was not much room for debate on the issue.

When the anointed leaders of the AGW (Climate Change) view will not attend events where they've been invited to debate the scientific issues I place them on a much different pedestal than the one they have adopted for themselves.

This is a useful idea for airing the issues, although I doubt that further discussion on blogs would add much to the sort of debates we already see.

If I attempt to put myself in the position of a robot from Mars who doesn't know anything about the climate change debate except that it seems important to humans, I don't believe I could conclude that anyone was «taken to the cleaners» in this exchange (assuming a robot from Mars knows what that expression means:) I think I'd have to conclude that both participants were framing the issue in different ways and so there wasn't a meeting of minds, nor any change of the needle by either one on the attitudes of the other, nor likely much to help inform locals who were just as mystified by the debate as I was.