I'm not saying that the authors of TEEB believe that, there's every indication that they believe exactly the opposite, but nevertheless by framing the discussion in financial terms potentially just reinforces the philosophical and psychological frameworks that have led to so
much destruction of people, animals and environment in the first place.
«It's not so
much the destruction of the buildings, because you can see destruction of buildings in other places.
Not exact matches
Therein lies an issue deserving a
much,
much closer look: whether vulnerable Democrats, chiefly
of the liberal persuasion, are targeted for
destruction.
But while the image
of Sundberg's house standing alone in a field
of destruction has become an icon for the ICF industry, selling concrete houses to North Americans faces some
much stiffer challenges than mere 200 - kilometre - per - hour winds and an eight - metre tidal surge.
Right from its opening sentence («One
of the most salient features
of our culture is that there is so
much bullshit,») the book's message resonated with a public outraged by a rash
of corporate scandals and feeling deceived by the failure
of American forces to find weapons
of mass
destruction in Iraq.
Peter Grandich talks about the 7 deadly sins
of finance that caused him so
much pain and heartache and that continues to lead others to death and
destruction.
«If in every round there was extensive rocket fire at cities like Ashkelon, Ashdod and Beersheva, you can only assume that
much loss
of life and
destruction property was prevented.
22 What if God, wanting to show His wrath and to make His power known, endured with
much longsuffering the vessels
of wrath prepared for
destruction, 23 and that He might make known the riches
of His glory on the vessels
of mercy, which He had prepared beforehand for glory, 24 even us whom He called, not
of the Jews only, but also
of the Gentiles?»
So
much harm from a single seed
of destruction calling people to value ignorance over knowledge, logic over irrationality, and delusion over reality.
It is part
of a
much larger pattern
of abuse and exploitation,
of the earth and
of people, which has occurred in South and Central America, and which is itself part
of an age - old historical pattern
of ecological
destruction.
Romans 9:22 - 24 — What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with
much patience vessels
of wrath prepared for
destruction?
Eventually, the Satanic powers brought so
much evil into the world, that they were once again able to lead the world to the brink
of complete
destruction.
It is time you must denounce Islam, religion
of death and
destruction, before it fills you with so
much hatred, you decide to explode in some strange country.
9:22: «What if God, willing to show his wrath [that is, to vindicate his justice], and to make his power known, endured [that is, permitted] with
much longsuffering the vessels
of wrath fitted to
destruction: and that he might make known the riches
of his glory on the vessels
of mercy, which he hath afore prepared unto glory,»... There is indeed no reason why some are elected to glory while others are rejected, except the will
of God.»
«Judaism at the time
of Jesus was
much more like Catholicism (priests leading worship based on sacrifice), whereas rabbinic Judaism after the Temple's
destruction was more like Protestantism (Scripture teachers leading worship without blood sacrifice).»
Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense
of it all with a wave
of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory
of an angry God (they called her a «vessel
of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one
of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all
of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape
of a child is part
of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too
much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense
of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.
The
destruction of millions
of species through extinction — what Deane - Drummond calls «amoral suffering» — can not be merely ascribed to the Fall
of Man since
much of it predates man's existence, and continues to occur independently
of man's activity.
Stupid, stupid people with blind hate towrds a religion are being led by fanaticism, because a HANDFUL
of men, thats right a HANDFUL caused the
destruction of the Twin Towers.For you people, I ask you to look in the mirror and see how
much destruction your Government has done in YOUR name.
throughout history, man has relied so
much on his intellect in trying to solve life's problems when time and again many
of our great leaders / intellectuals have driven to
destruction.
Once in Africa, Schweitzer gradually came to understand what well may be the most important mistake made by the Europeans (and Americans) since the rise
of Western civilization — namely, their pride in their superindustrialized «mastery» over the forces
of Nature, a
much - vaunted control which is leading to the
destruction of our biosphere.
22 What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with
much patience vessels
of wrath prepared for
destruction, 23 in order to make known the riches
of his glory for vessels
of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory --» (Romans 9:10 - 23)
Given the range
of pressing moral issues that Küng takes up (including war genocide and ecological
destruction), I would not make so
much of this issue except for two things.
The problem with bisexuality in my life (and I can speak only for myself) is that it has been grounded too
much in my utopic fantasy
of the way things «ought» to be and too little in the more modest recognition
of myself as a participant in this society at this time in this world, in which I have both a concrete desire for personal intimacy with someone else and a responsibility to participate in, even witness to, the
destruction of unjust social structures — specifically, the heterosexual box.
It leaves open for endless consideration and reconsideration the question
of how
much abuse
of power or mutual
destruction can be tolerated in one area before a wider community intervenes.
Much of the work
of God on earth is focused on protecting humanity from complete
destruction at the hand
of these destroying powers.
Yes, a chimpanzee's co-star can be elected and re-elected to generate an enormous deficit, nap through
much of his second term, and complete the
destruction of the country's manufacturing sector.
This perspective unmistakably reveals the unwholesomeness, not to put it more strongly,
of our way
of life: our obsession with sex, violence, and the pornography
of «making it;» our addictive dependence on drugs, «entertainment,» and the evening news; our impatience with anything that limits our sovereign freedom
of choice, especially with the constraints
of marital and familial ties; our preference for «nonbinding commitments;» our third - rate educational system; our third - rate morality; our refusal to draw a distinction between right and wrong, lest we «impose» their morality on us; our reluctance to judge or be judged; our indifference to the needs
of future generations, as evidence by our willingness to saddle them with a huge national debt, an overgrown arsenal
of destruction, and a deteriorating environment; our unsated assumption, which underlies so
much of the propaganda for unlimited abortion, that only those children born for success ought to be allowed to be born at all.
On the contrary, there is a
much more imminent threat
of human self -
destruction through nuclear war.
In wartime the GNP soars; nothing is subtracted for the
destruction of cities and infrastructure,
much less for the loss
of human life.
Much more serious is the
destruction of habitat by deforestation and expansion
of farming.
If you wonder why storms and
destruction happen in nature,
much of it is because the forces
of nature are no longer under human control.
Why would there be so
much dying and
destruction if it was the word
of the almighty?
Jodi, the poppies are from the battlefield (I think the Somme)
of the First World War that, after so
much death and
destruction, bloomed with poppies once again.
That is why
much of what appears to be self - giving love is really self -
destruction.
St. Paul, in contrast, asks the question, «What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with
much patience the vessels
of wrath made for
destruction...» (Rom.
To halt and reverse this
destruction of natural beauty, not only must standards
of individual taste be raised, but
much stricter social controls must be exercised.
The
destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah had as
much to do with neglect
of the poor as it did with sexual immorality.
A little further, ``... God desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with
much patience vessels
of wrath prepared for
destruction...» And then further, ``... only a remnant will be saved for the Lord will carry out his sentence upon the earth fully and without delay.»
What seems most likely is that,
much like the flood and due to the various elements
of the Chaos Theory, God was unable to stop the
destruction of Sodom, but would do everything He could to rescue and deliver people from the impending
destruction.
Interest rates
much higher than in the countries
of the North contribute to the
destruction of national producers; uncontrolled privatisation and denationalization develop in the search for the resources demanded by investors.
Thus for each
of us, the exacting and inescapable question, which must be faced and answered, is the question
of our total mortal life as we are now living it, a question which arises from our mortality with the responsibility which that entails, which puts itself to us in the form
of our measuring up to the possibility
of becoming authentically ourselves, and which issues in our realization (not so
much in thought as in deeply felt experience as existing men)
of blessedness, as we know ourselves becoming what we truly are, or in
destruction or damnation, as we know ourselves both frustrated men and failures in our human fulfillment.
They turned out to be based on erroneous information (weapons
of mass
destruction) and a dreamy idealism (democracy)» there was and is
much to criticize» but the arguments for war in 2003 were articulate and admitted
of just war analysis.
I am very
much alive and proud
of the havoc and
destruction al Qaeda has created, far exceeding my wildest expectations.
Followed by how the days leading up to the flood will be
much like the days
of the Son
of man that will lead up to
destruction.
Still others see hope only in the
destruction of all forms
of industrial civilisation and the return to
much simpler forms
of social organisation.
Monsoons and hurricanes cause
destruction, but also deposit
much - needed rainfall in what would otherwise be regions
of perpetual drought.
Christians have been responsible for countless deaths, cultural
destruction, etc.... We would be
MUCH better off if the Paganism
of Ancient Rome was the culturally dominant faith.
My hope is not so
much for the ultimate
destruction of evil as its redemption.
They can not join with those vociferous persons, often associated with conservative religious groups, who seek to go back to what are often styled «the good old days»: on the other hand, they do not have
much sympathy for the wildly radical people who assume that there must be a total
destruction of our inheritance, in the naive confidence that surely «something» will then appear that is entirely good and sound and right.
That and our «third - rate educational system, our third - rate morality, our refusal to draw a distinction between right and wrong lest we «impose» our morality on others and thus invite others to «impose» their morality onus, our reluctance to judge or be judged, our indifference to the needs
of future generations as evidenced by our willingness to saddle them with a huge national debt, an overgrown arsenal
of destruction, and a deteriorating environment; our inhospitable attitude to the newcomers born in our midst, our unstated assumption which underlies so
much of the propaganda for unlimited abortion that only those children born for success ought to be allowed to be born at all.»