Sentences with phrase «much difference in the result»

If you use the Kelvin scale, there will not be much difference in the result averaged any which way and b. an arithmetic average has a simple justification based on thermodynamics.

Not exact matches

But then some business school professor would probably be rude enough to bring up the fact that if 225 million orangutans had engaged in a similar exercise, the results would be much the same... I would argue, however, that there are some important differences in the examples I am going to present.

For, recognizing that «there is a difference between translating what the text means and translating what it says,» he emphatically elects the latter, thus reconnecting the genre of modern Bible translation with the ancient practice of reading aloud and, as a result, conveying much of the texture of the Hebrew in ways that other translations can not.

Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger and others were and are much taken with Cullman's argument that the confessional divisions of the sixteenth century are the work of God's «left hand,» and the resulting differences must somehow be given the opportunity to play themselves out rather than being «negotiated away» in ecumenical dialogue.

Thanks so much for your perspective — as for the baking recipes, I think it all depends on who your audience is — not everyone will shy away from a long list of ingredients, though some will... and yes — which flours / dry ingredients you use, depending on the recipe, can certainly make a huge difference in the result!

The lower levels of baseline sugar sweetened drink consumption in the UK compared with the US may in part explain why the effect on obesity that we estimate in the UK is much less than that estimated in the US.12 The differences with respect to other modelling studies may also be partly explained by their use of higher own price elasticity values for sugar sweetened drinks than we have calculated and used here.18 22 52 We can not make direct comparisons between the results of our study and the results of recent studies of the effect of reducing sugar sweetened drink consumption on body weight in children, 5 7 as the relation between energy balance and change in body mass index in children who are growing is different from that in adults.

of course no team wants to lose but I can guarantee you that the reaction by the Chelski fans after today's results are nowhere near what would have occurred if we shit the bed on opening day... the difference is they have tasted EPL success on more than one occasion recently, they have won the Champions League and they have done it with 3 different managers in the last 12 years with a similar, if not smaller, wage bill than us... in comparison, we have been experiencing our own personal Groundhog Day with nothing to show for it but a few silvery trinkets that would barely wet the appetite of a world - class club... so it's time for Wenger to stop gloating over our week one escape act and make some substantial moves before this window closes or I fear that things will take a horrible turn when the inevitable happens... living on a knife's edge is no way to go through a full season of football and regardless of what side of the argument you fall on, you could feel high levels of toxicity in the air and that was friggin week one... I would much rather someone tried their best and failed, than took half - measures and hoped for the best

There is not much difference in the difficulty of our remaining fixtures but whereas we bounced back from a disappointing result in the Champions League, Man City were poor and deserved to lose today.

So in some areas our greater caution is providing real results — several hundred kids each year who aren't dying in car accidents, for example, while in other areas, it isn't making much difference.

We saw pretty much no significant difference in the results of studies with and without this kind of adjustment.

Because there is so much conventional wisdom and general impressions on these issues, I think it's helpful for this paper to focus on a very clear result, which has to do with the differences in cooperation when rank is involved.»

Some use equations in which the exponents are much smaller than called for in the square law and in which there are some differences in exponent between attacker and defender (e.g., to reflect the different mix of aimed and unaimed fire that might result from the defender having better cover and the attacker relying more heavily on artillery preparation).

As Jennifer Ouellette reported in Quanta in 2013, Turing «proposed that patterns such as spots form as a result of the interactions between two chemicals that spread throughout a system much like gas atoms in a box do, with one crucial difference.

How can a single decade be enough to overturn previous results that much, especially when there are other straightforward methods explaining the differences in trend from empirical data, i.e. Foster / Rahmsdorf 2012?

I've been slowly but surely seeing results in most of my body (a lot of compliments when I wear slim shirts)... Though, I still don't see much of a change in my abs... I generally adhere to a good diet with cheat meals here and there and even do 6/7 mile runs every now and again (I know it's not necessary, but I like it) but still barely see a difference... I almost always work my abs 3x per week when I do my Tri-weekly arms / chest / ab split.....

In short, there was not much of a difference in results between the two dietIn short, there was not much of a difference in results between the two dietin results between the two diets.

Analysis of PISA results has shown a «crucial difference» between youngsters who perform well in the reading assessment and those who perform poorly is not how much time they spend reading, but whether they read daily for enjoyment.

Taken together, these results show a) quite weak relationships of policy with reported instruction within states (much weaker than has been found elsewhere), and b) differences across states in relationships between the attributes and content.

When asked in 2001 to rate the relative difficulty of U.S. classes, 55.9 percent replied «a lot easier»; compare this to the 2016 recent results, where 66.4 percent of respondents rated classes in America as «much easier» than in their home country, a statistically significant difference.

Although further study is needed, the research suggests that much of the inconsistency results from true differences in educator effectiveness over time and contexts.

Sharpe tells the CTMirror, «What Milner has been for the last 20 years is a chronically failing school, arguably the worst in the state» and repeats his misleading claim that Jumoke has achieved much better academic results, overlooking, as he always does, the fundamental difference in student populations.

I wonder why no - one has had a look at the difference between LA - run community schools and academies / free schools in the context of this story... The result of my quick fag - packet calculations (which I'm sure aren't 100 % correct, but I think are probably pretty much on the money): the percentages of schools which have higher FSM than non-FSM Progress 8 scores are: Free Schools — 6 % Academies — 3.2 % Community Schools — 0.8 % The only reason I had a look is because I was pretty confident that if the figures had been the other way round it would have featured heavily in the article.

In order to estimate how much adequacy - based school finance reforms have contributed to this reduction, we use an «event study» design, which essentially looks at the result of three successive differences for each school finance reform.

Listening with headphones resulted in much richer and clearer audio, though we didn't notice a difference when we turned the Beats setting off.

Although this 1.75 % difference in costs between actively and passively managed mutual funds may not seem like much, there's a growing body of research that says it makes a huge difference in long - term investment results.

• Unlike in the U.S., underwriting standards for qualifying mortgage borrowers in Canada have been maintained at prudent levels resulting in mortgage borrowers here being much more creditworthy; • Canadian mortgage lenders never offered low initial «teaser» rate mortgages that led to most of the difficulties for mortgage borrowers in the U.S.; • Most mortgages in Canada are held by their original lender, not packaged and sold to third parties as is typical in the U.S., and consequently, Canadian mortgage lenders have a vested interest in ensuring that their mortgage borrowers are creditworthy and not likely to default; • Only 0.3 % of Canadian mortgages are in arrears versus 4.5 % in the U.S. and what even before the start of the U.S. housing meltdown two years ago was 2 %; • Canadians tend to pay down their mortgage faster than in the U.S. where mortgage interest is deductible from taxes, which encourages U.S. homeowners to take equity out of their homes to finance other spending, a difference that is reflected in the fact that in Canada mortgage debt accounts for just over 30 % of the value of homes, compared with 55 % in the U.S.

Examples of how FICO effects interest rates: On a 30 year fixed - rate home mortgage, the difference between a strong FICO score and a weak one can result in as much as 4 point difference on your interest rate.

To quote again from the Wealthsimple «calming» letter (as I call them), «If you've got your money invested in a diversified portfolio at Wealthsimple, (the election result) shouldn't make much of a difference.

The spreads in Forex trading are also much lower than in the traditional stocks and shares market which results in a smaller difference between the values of currencies while purchasing and selling.

The key difference, however, will be that ZDB's average coupon will be lower that its yield to maturity, resulting in much greater tax - efficiency:

Both of the above papers compare the extracap procedure with the TPLO procedure (TTA was not being performed widely in 2005 so not studied as much) and the results were similar — no significant difference between the two procedures.

There are 5 difficulty levels including very easy, easy, medium, hard and realistic with the major differences between each of the difficulty levels from very easy up to realistic is that very easy A.I. will remain on a fixed racing line and are easier to overtake in comparison to realistic A.I. which provides far more aggressive A.I. that are much harder to overtake due to their faster pace and the ability to vary their racing lines to increase the possibility of overtaking their opposition, but most impressively of all is that they are equally as capable of pushing the boundaries of their pace just a little too much resulting in going off track or crashing.

Your calculation describes how much difference in infrared radiational heating, dQ, results from a given increment of temperature change, assuming emissivity and everything else remain fixed.

* There is too much conflicting evidence about climate change to know whether it is actually happening * Current climate change is part of a pattern that has been going on for millions of years * Climate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climate change

As I understand it, the GRACE results from NASA measure differences in gravitational pull to determine the mass of ice while the Zwally study (also NASA run) measures the height of the ice / snow cover, estimates how much of that height is ice vs snow, and then computes the resulting ice mass.

Failing you or anyone bringing me such relevant test results, on a balance sheet, showing me exactly how much warming and how much cooling the increase in CO2 causes, common sense would tell me that 50 - 100 ppm of a change in concentration of any one particular gas in the atmosphere, especially one on which all of our life and food (and drinks) depends, can not make much of any difference whatsoever.

Compared with the 1950 — 2005 results, the larger model versus observed difference over 1900 — 2005 is due to a much larger observed warming in the early twentieth century than the model expectation.

Hence it is not straightforward to understand how much of the variation between simulated climate in the models results from internal climate sensitivity and how much results from differences in the forcings.

Pat, the lag to which you allude, in fact, makes a minor but significant difference to «the result» (meaning the correlation between CO2 and temperature in the record), but whether or not it does is really very much beside the point.

These differences may be as much a function of different interpolation methods and station densities as they are of errors in observations or the result of sampling different time periods (Hulme and New, 1997; New, 1999).

The results vary from region to region because of differences in regional climate trends as well as heating and cooling systems (for example, much of the northern part of the country relies on natural gas heating).

As a result, the technology appears unlikely to be deployed in time to make much difference in the coming surge of power - plant construction.

Half of that would have «stayed» in the atmosphere, resulting in a reduction of 50 ppmv or around 0.4 C difference in global warming (i.e. «much ado about nothing»).

How can a single decade be enough to overturn previous results that much, especially when there are other straightforward methods explaining the differences in trend from empirical data, i.e. Foster / Rahmsdorf 2012?

The ROW trend is much different than the US trends: the most interesting result of this will (in my opinion) be, not so much a major revision of US temperature history where one already has pretty warm 1930s (but there will be an effect there), but the information on variations in trends resulting from site quality differences than need to be included in ROW calculations and confidence interval calculations.

This is a quite rapid process (for the upper oceans), but much slower for deep ocean temperature changes, which results in the above differences in ratios for short term and long term temperature variations...

I never found much of a difference in terms of results between Lexis and Westlaw.

Harder hit were the firms ranked 11 to 25, «with the result that there is now a much reduced difference in terms of profitability amongst the Top 11 - 25 firms and the Top 26 - 50 firms.»

In Canada, I think it is much easier to go through and practice law, due to the fact that the Canadian legal system is same as in India as both countries were under British colony and so as a result there are fewer differences in comparison to the UIn Canada, I think it is much easier to go through and practice law, due to the fact that the Canadian legal system is same as in India as both countries were under British colony and so as a result there are fewer differences in comparison to the Uin India as both countries were under British colony and so as a result there are fewer differences in comparison to the Uin comparison to the US.

You can, however, adjust the results in a number of ways, so that your slashtag becomes more and more accurate, though I suspect that to make much of a difference could take quite a long time; and I wonder whether a well - constructed Boolean search wouldn't be a whole lot better.