There is
much disagreement here on how far we should take the objector's quotes.
Not exact matches
James I just don't think there is
much substantive
disagreement here at all.
Here, I think the basic
disagreement between Pat Frank and the reviewers is that the reviewers want to treat the value of 4W / m ^ 2 as though it is really accurately known from considerations outside the modeling effort itself, and Pat Frank wants to show how
much uncertainty in the modeling results is added when it is treated as any other poorly known parameter..
But there is
much that is unknown and uncertain
here, with plenty of scope for rational
disagreement on this topic.
John — I don't see
much latitude
here for
disagreements between lawyer and client that would require an arbitration clause.