Sentences with phrase «much discussion as»

There is much discussion as to the causes and consequences of «peer orientation» which might help parents understand their children in more depth.

However, the sale has sparked much discussion as to whether the trustee's actions have been a factor driving down the price of bitcoin, which took a notable dip on Feb. 5 — the same day as the 18,000 BTC sale.

Though it doesn't get much discussion as of late, the rear camera is actually one of the best you'll find on the market today.

There has not been much discussion as to the challenges involved by inheriting a broken US immigration system.

As for legal issues related to the publication, there hasn't been much discussion as of yet in the blogosphere.

I would submit that the views of those scientists who are genuinely alarmed about such possibilities, are worth at least as much discussion as the effluvium emanating from the likes of Monckton.

There has already been much discussion as to whether and how Occupy protests will continue if they are evicted from the parks and squares that they have commandeered.

There has been much discussion as to why tree ring data stopped being a useful measure of temperature in the 60's and 70's.

There is much discussion as to the value of the climate sensitivity, which swirls around whether there is net positive or negative feedback from things like clouds and water vapor.

This created much discussion as staff saw what the students thought about learning, feedback, and their teachers.

In recent months there has been much discussion as to what the first Christians believed about marriage and the discipline of the sacraments.

Not exact matches

Speaking as part of a panel discussion on the future of VR in Shenzhen, China, on Tuesday, Pao talked about how much work HTC and the other high - end VR purveyors have ahead of them in selling consumers on the technology.

As far as any substantive discussion of small businesses goes, the last GOP debate in mid-September left much to be desired, though altering the tax code and adopting a flat tax system, which affects businesses of all sizes, were hot topicAs far as any substantive discussion of small businesses goes, the last GOP debate in mid-September left much to be desired, though altering the tax code and adopting a flat tax system, which affects businesses of all sizes, were hot topicas any substantive discussion of small businesses goes, the last GOP debate in mid-September left much to be desired, though altering the tax code and adopting a flat tax system, which affects businesses of all sizes, were hot topics.

Maybe you can move on later to more discussion (or more slides) but just know that you won't have people hooked as much as you did for seven minutes.

Should leaders start every meeting with a reminder that discussions are not to leave the building, much the same as theater goers are told to turn off their cell phones?

But even considering how much pressure it's constantly under to grow, and as crazy as the talent competition all around it is, Centro's strategies and the ideas that came through in our discussion were extremely thoughtful and long - term.

«We learn as much from the class discussions as we do from the actual teachings,» he says.

Again in my own discussions, there isn't a fascination with Twitter feeds as much as there once was.

As Richard Settersten, author of Not Quite Adults: Why 20 - Somethings Are Choosing a Slower Path to Adulthood, and Why It's Good for Everyone, has said: «the media focuses so much on coddled kids, but there's a huge, invisible class of young people that's just not part of our public discussion and who are really in dire straits.»

And thus Gamergate's ability to swiftly shutdown discussion at SXSW doesn't really come as much of a surprise, particularly for the women who have long been on the receiving end of the group's harassment.

There are no vacuums left in today's world of social media, which means that, if you're not talking about your products and driving the discussion as much as possible, someone else will be.

My weekly technology law column (Toronto Star version, homepage version) focuses on the lack of movement on the digital economy strategy, arguing that it has emerged as the government's «Penske File» - the source of considerable discussion and much «work» but thus far few tangible results (for non-Seinfeld watchers, the Penske file has become synonymous for a non-existent work project).

She noted that with the $ 15 minimum wage (a frequent point of comparison in the discussion) Safeway chose to absorb the cost of the minimum wage instead of cutting jobs or passing the costs on to consumers, but that made Seattle Safeway stores» profit margin half as much as stores in other locations.

As government and corporate data - gathering efforts swelled over the last century, citizens largely accepted, without much discussion or protest, that their society would be fueled by the collection of personal information.

If not for the fact that I write these weekly comments to address everything - favorable and unfavorable - with my shareholders, I wouldn't consider a pullback of 6.5 % as meriting much discussion.

«But I believe there's something missing from most of the discussion: You should spend just as much time thinking about how to bring in extra money as you do thinking of ways to save what you already have.

Even though I know nothing about the iron ore market, and certainly not as much as the CEO of Fortescue, I know arithmetic, and even before I heard Minack's discussion of the global increase in production, I simply could not get the arithmetic that connected Chinese interest rates with Australian iron ore exports to work otherwise.

Although discussions of monetary policy since the crisis have mainly had to do with the quantity of money, and central banks» efforts to expand that quantity so as to stimulate spending, the effects of the crisis, and of governments» response to it, on the quality of money, and especially on the investments its holders have been funding, deserve at least as much attention.

But at the same time that's all secondarily affecting the millennial generation as well so there's not much discussion in that regard, you know how repressed interest rates have negatively affected the millennial generation.

There has also been much discussion about the buyer's journey — including from me — on how we have to map to the buyer's journey as they go through these buying stages and how we track via the sales funnel.

In their discussion they cover Zenefits» meteoric rise as the fastest growing SaaS company ever (grown to 800 employees in two years) with no plans to slow down, why «the Salesforce for employment» is an interesting analogy for the Zenefits business, how Andreessen Horowitz was a huge help in landing David Sacks (former Yammer Founder / CEO) as COO, how Jason switched his companies to Zenefits last year & is saving huge $ $ — and much more!

Some of the discussion may be familiar to longtime readers of this publication, but much of it is helpful refresher material, especially for those of us who are generally not as well attuned to developments in physics as we ought to be.

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

Closing lesson for today Mikey, as soon as a person has to resort to name calling then he or she has pretty much failed and lost the discussion.

Mr. Kurtz, as is usual in these discussions, makes no complaint about black churches that are much more overtly political, nor about other religious organizations on the left that frequently come much closer to «electioneering.»

«Theory» holds sway in contemporary discussions of literature, poetry, and art these days as much by force of habit as by ardent conviction.

Discussions of gay marriage can focus as much on scriptural equality as on the ability to reproduce.

but as it is, you are erecting a straw man that actually hinders BOTH sides from having honest discussion, much less progressing toward your desired «middle ground.»

(Moreso than my question) I suspect that even though we likely disagree about much theologically... we could have an enjoyable discussion and likely part as friends.

Aristotle insisted that discussion should seek only «as much clearness as the subject matter admits of.»

In this regard I am sorry that Hauerwas did not give us his perspective on Bonhoeffer's «Structure of Responsible Life,» a text that, as far as I can tell, did not inform his discussion very much — for reasons that are not clear to me.

Having being on the receiving end of the «man - hater» comment more times than I can count, seeing it listed as number one — in the form of «I like white males so much I married one» — rubbed me the wrong way.Being called a man - hater is often unfairly used as a way to silence women and dismiss their arguments outright, which is troubling, especially when it happens in the midst of a theological discussion.

I was just doing this as part of my trilogy; it started with Buddha and then Jesus, and now it turns out serendipitously that the timing is appropriate because there is so much discussion about Islam in the world.

Surely much more thought and honest discussion between Christians is needed on this point, as well as a more realistic appraisal of the actual demonstrated methods of Jesus.

It would be strange if, after all the recent discussion as to how much Christianity is a «historical faith,» Christian theologians would adopt an understanding of theological language which ruled out all historical statements.

I've been asking myself this for years, and having discussions about this with pastors; It's as if becoming a Christian is like buying a new car but no one tells you the interest rate on the loan or how much it will cost you each month, then the car breaks down and they tell you that you can't return it or exchange it for another because it's the «one true car» and «once you buy this car, you'll always own this car».

As I've had to respond to people who consider themselves «ex-Catholics» or «lapsed Catholics» or simply non-practicing Catholics, the discussions inevitably come around to the Church's retrograde positions on pretty much everything to do with sex and with the role of women.

My family members who are still very much a part of the christian belief system and we avoid any discussion because I must be wrong or misinformed not to believe as they do.

As much as possible, participate in forum discussions, chats and video conferencinAs much as possible, participate in forum discussions, chats and video conferencinas possible, participate in forum discussions, chats and video conferencing.

In the debate over abortion there has been much discussion surrounding «the seamless garment» as a metaphor for the so - called «life issues.»