Sentences with phrase «much discussion here»

From the sustainability benefits of goat meat to what veganic farming actually looks like, there's been much discussion here lately about the proper role of domesticated animals on the farm.

This excerpt has never been given much discussion here, even though it was peer reviewed and published.

The uncharted series is rated M, so it doesn't merit much discussion here, but this is likely going to be the biggest release for the PlayStation 4 by the time it is released next year no matter what comes out between now and then.

There has been much discussion here about your mother's habit of reading the end of a book first.

Which brings up a popular subject of much discussion here in the Sugar World.

Well, pretty much every discussion here is interesting but this... [Read more...]

There's not much discussion here..

Not exact matches

There is so much here that needs discussion and exploration.

The issue of freedom and determinism, even in Process and Reality, is much too involved to pursue here.9 But Mays's discussion (PW, chapter 17) contains not one footnote to this basic text.

Tallulah13, It would be too much for me to type the discussion here in sound bytes, but check this out, and take it for what it's worth...

Deciding to produce and record this project here in Boone with the talented musicians here allowed for a much more organic process, and led to beautiful late - night discussions about what God had been teaching us.

A question... weekdays I produce this link post at my blog... and I was copying it here with the idea it might stimulate discussions... but in light of Joe's recent post that Evangel posts should have lasting relevance... and much of these links are topical and on current events that leads....

Much could be said about this topic of course, but based on some of my favorite commentaries, I've identified three influences that, for the purposes of our discussions here, should be introduced — Purim, Persia, and Patriarchy.

There's so much more to unpack here, too, and so many more discussion points.

«Now, how much notice I take and how often I meet with them is another thing, so I think I can manage that sort of a conversation by being seen to and occasionally meeting with everyone and anyone, but in terms of having structure and detail and discussions in confidence, I only do it here.»

Much of the discussion on radio call - in shows here has concerned your choice of cover shot and other pictures of Pat Summitt (above, with son Tyler and father Richard).

One wonders why they insist on returning here, when they could fit in so much better at sites like le g. I don't go to le g because I'm from a different planet from those guys, so we would be unable to hold a decent discussion.

It's too much to talk about all that here, so I will limit my discussion to how Ava, the robot, seduces and basically destroys Caleb, who was chosen by Nathan, his employer, to interact with her to see if she passes the Turing test, which examines if a machine has consciousness and is indistinguishable from a human.

Not sure if I'll be writing much while I'm here, but some zippy new article ideas should start to brew while I'm sitting in on discussions.

The government is aware that there is currently much discussion within the poultry industry about the danger that the new EU legislation to improve the conditions for cage - reared birds might be implemented here but not elsewhere in Europe.

«Here we get into discussions with scientists from completely different areas much faster and deeper and profit greatly from different approaches to a scientific problem,» says Schwappach.

There is almost too much here to take in: tax incentives, export controls, forestry policy, waste reduction and recycling proposals, CO2 taxes, electrical co-generation, virgin materials fees... There is even a discussion of energy - saving light bulbs and how to market them more efficiently.

It doesn't seem like there has been much discussion on cellulite and gluten, but here's my experience:

This site is extraordinarily important and the discussions here show a much higher scientific awareness than among the general population.

His penchant for comedy, a special highlight here involves a discussion of criticism versus art, is still very much present and welcoming.

Just some short observations right now (expect much more discussion about these in an upcoming podcast): American Hustle and The Wolf Of Wall Street did excellent here, especially the former, which grabbed nominations in all four acting categories.

Space limits an extended discussion here, but we note two conclusions from a 2012 article by Economic Policy Institute researcher Monique Morrissey, who explains that «the logical implication of Richwine and Biggs's [pension] position is that public employers and taxpayers would be indifferent between current pension funding practices and investing in Treasury securities, even though this would triple the cost of pension benefits» and that R & B «selectively alternate between the cost of benefits to employers and the value to workers, and inappropriately equate the latter with the often much higher cost to individuals of obtaining equivalent benefits.»

Then Shanker, who had remained silent for much of the discussion, told the council, «I think you're missing something here.»

DIGITAL EDITOR ANDREW STOY: It's been awhile since a relatively nondescript car has come through here and caused so much discussion.

Here's why: I spend a lot of time participating in online discussions among self - published authors so that I can learn as much as possible about their book marketing challenges and help them solve their problems.

Because Viz had a special panel just for Sailor Moon, there was not much discussion about Sailor Moon here, except that the re-dub of the original series would be released in premium sets, with each season divided into two sets with plenty of extra features such as booklets, shimmery chipboard slipcases, pre-order bonus coins, cards, extra footage of what Sailor Moon has meant to people, and more.

Much longer discussions about the leak and potential fallout here:

That is a much more lengthy discussion that I won't get into here.

[0:37:11.5] GC: David, thanks so much for coming on the show and livening up our discussion here about credit cards and for sharing your expertise, thank you everybody out there for watching and until next week, be good with your money.

The Dog Who Loved Too Much: Tales, Treatments and the Psychology of Dogs by Nicholas Dodman, Ph.D Here is the first consumer - oriented discussion of the use and application of medication in the management and treatment of behavioral problems in dogs.

The SIM / SOLSTICE instruments on SORCE have reported much larger UV changes than previous estimates, and this has been widely questioned (see here for a previous discussion).

This statement has been source of much discussion both here and at climateaudit.

I don't see much discussion of that here or elsewhere (it's in keeping with the practice of newspapers, TV weatherfolk and such to target temperature and be vague about humidity!

See here for a much better discussion of the same issue (summary: the models projected a ~ 0.23 + / -0.04 deg C / dec, and the data showed ~ 0.20 + / -0.04 deg C / dec from 1984 to 2008).

There is a lot of discussion of this in the press, and on the relevant websites, so not much to add here.

* Tenney Naumer — sometimes the deny / delay crowd riles her up a little too much, but aside from the argumentation Tenney's had some great discussions of actual data, of which there's sadly too little going on most of the time here.

Lets see how much methane shows up, when and where, if there is such data, that is a crucial discussion needed before conclusions are thrown out, understanding the Arctic requires data from here.

I think I know what you mean here but in the context of the previous Much Ado about Methane article with discussion of the difference between atmospheric lifetime of a CO2 molecule vs. lifetime of an increase in concentration, this could also be put more clearly.

Thanks for not much of a discussion here.

John, On the «Presentation: Precautionary Principle...» thread you told me that you think it's «unhelpful to conflate discussion of climate - science issues like the modelling of SO2, about which none of us here know very much, with discussion of economic projections, where we can have a useful discussion.»

There is a much bigger problem here than the sloppy use of the word — it's that it obscures the discussion.

I certainly would not want to have a direct forced discussion with the two students at this point or to have relayed a message from an anonymous someone who doesn't think much of the goings on here.

A word, here, on Box 13.7 from AR4's Working Group III volume, which formed the basis of much of the discussion about burden - sharing at COP - 13 in Bali, and which was cited in the Bali Action Plan.

A while ago, can't recall off - hand which discussion here, I was told that carbon dioxide had a much greater heat capacity than oxygen and nitrogen..

The climate scientists that worry about these issues don't post here (much - Jeff made a single post) so you aren't really going to see a meaningful discussion on the role of chaos or stochastic processes on climates, how that is handled in model building, and what that means in terms of model verification.