Dr. Curry observes: «This is all over the news and the blogosphere, but not too
much discussion yet in the climate blogosphere.»
This is all over the news and the blogosphere, but not too
much discussion yet in the climate blogosphere.
Not exact matches
It's
much better to use email to get everyone up to speed and then have a
discussion of what
yet needs to be accomplished.
Why has so
much attention been given to President Obama's religious affiliation
yet no consideration nor
discussion has made it to center stage about Mit Romney's religious persuasion Mormonism?
Like
much of Colson and Eckerd's book, this
discussion bas a familiar ring to it;
yet these simple truths are ones with which many of us need to be reacquainted.
Revolutionary as
much of this was in the history of human thinking,
yet, in surveying it, one is conscious of a certain impatience to get on to the basic problem that confronts us in this
discussion: What were the processes of thought by which Israel came to such views?
I think that you both are making some good points, although... @BG hasn't been back to respond
much yet, I'd like to join in on the
discussion if you wouldn't mind.
Yet for lauded sociobiologist Sarah Blaffer Hrdy, Yates» situation brought to light a
much larger
discussion — why was a psychologically distressed mother left to care for her children without any social or institutional support?
What is as
yet uncertain is how
much influence this vibrant
discussion will have on those in public office.
Yet the proposal from NCAN has as
much to do with shaping
discussions of a broader higher education bill as it does in seeking to influence the spending bill for next year.
The context of what I wrote is the
discussion above, which talks about how observed temperatures can't
yet say
much about the sensitivity, perhaps not
yet for many decades.
However, I've
yet to hear
much personal
discussion on it from anyone other than the critics and it would seem that Farhadi has still some way to go before he gets the recognition he deserves among your average film enthusiast.
One could argue the tonal disconnect between an act of terrorism and comedy, and
yet the injection of some quips and the odd running joke about a producer obsessed with balls turns out to be one of the film's greatest weapons, moreso than the overly familiar stench of disdain and dissidence as a poorly planned hostage stunt yields a
much more complex
discussion about class structure and the corruption of the American financial system.
And
yet, the education policy
discussion has devolved into a near exclusive debate about common core standards, testing, and access to higher education when so
much more needs to be considered.
I can't believe I've read so
much of this
discussion... I thought it'd be more informational instead of debate; however, despite my being pro-choice on neuter / spay, I can't help but notice how you continuously requested research and berated for not providing it,
yet also managed to get away with no proof yourself, just «quotes».
Peter Molyneux has been the topic of
much discussion in the past week following some rather damning news regarding Godus, his latest bundle of as
yet undelivered promises, followed by -LSB-...]
They have made him one of the leading abstract painters of the last 40 years and have been the subject of
much discussion,
yet a cogent, plausible understanding of them is still needed.
The public
discussion on this issue will be
much the poorer for this — both directly because this event is (
yet) another reason not to have a serious
discussion, but also indirectly because his voice as an advocate of science, once powerful, has now been diminished
Yet in any of the literature I rarely see a mention,
much less a graph, showing solar output in the past, lets say 150 years, or to correlate to something like the Hockey stick let's say 1000 years, wouldn't it be nice if we had some data showing the trends since let's say the beginning of industrialization, I mean it has to have some relevance to the
discussion.
Yet much of the policy
discussion is focused on implementing carbon taxes or cap and trade schemes, with an often - unstated expectation that the technologies exist to achieve decarbonisation, or will emerge more or less spontaneously.
In
yet another in a back - to - back - to - back nonstop series of amoral
discussions and actions in the Trump White House, now we can watch them wiggle and maneuver to see just how
much moral, legal and national responsibility they can get away with evading on the known most critical issue the world faces.
As for legal issues related to the publication, there hasn't been
much discussion as of
yet in the blogosphere.
Because after years of
discussion about globalisation, consolidation and the Legal Services Act (LSA) revolutionising the market, the reality is that
much of this transformation is
yet to happen.
If you are not sure about how
much you want to be paid
yet, delay the
discussion for the time being.
Since that time, there has been
much discussion of further increases, but there has not
yet been one because of mixed signals on the strength of the economy and the inflation outlook.