Sentences with phrase «much easier argument»

Just think how much easier your argument would be now (correct though it is), if you and the rest of your tribe hadn't been pitching the surface temps as «global average temperature» for so long.

A much easier argument for a christian with background in these areas, which I have, but there is staunch refusal to admit to basic premises from non-christians on the most simple issues.

Not exact matches

That Monday's accident was the first fatal incident involving a fully autonomous vehicle indicates that arguments for their safety have merit, but much of that testing has occurred on highways, which are easier for self - driving cars to navigate than dense, urban environments.

DO NOT insist on religious leaders making their case by reasoned argument, but by bald assertion or authoritarian claims which are much easier to invent and promote.

Why wrestle with the substance of their argument when it's so much easier to just sigh about «kids these days» and be done with it?

PS: It's also much easier to say «you're not going to accept what I have to say» instead of looking at the claim itself and saying «If an Islamic person offered me this argument, would I convert to Islam?»

There's an argument that URI didn't necessarily need to win this game to get into the tournament, but it certainly makes for a much more comfortable selection show and a much easier week for the team.

Getting tired of this argument Too easy for players to hide behind Wenger, if he's guilty of anything it's protecting them too much

@laninja, do nt get my last post wrong mate i am not defending that it was embarrasing and keane, as captain, should hav been a man and told the ref he made a mistake, but the way he grabbed the ball amidst the georgians complaining to the ref smacks of everything i hav been complaining about this week, but listen does that mean the other 15 squad members should suffer because keane lacks as much integrity as henry?i hav been surprised how easy lads hav found it to favour the french in this argument....

It would be much easier for your argument if everyone could see us as judging you and your ways of parenting.

It is much easier to make great arguments in government.

Pokemon Sun & Moon are a pretty excellent Pokemon package and have pretty much everything you'd want — but it'd be easy to make the argument that the duo were mildly held back by the ageing 3DS hardware.

It's easy to focus squarely on the big studios, on the faceless corporations that make up what we perceive to be Hollywood, mostly because such a surface - level argument doesn't require much thought.

I mentioned a general pattern in that it's much easier to make a favorable argument for a hotel credit card given their often lower annual fees, free nights, and automatic elite status when compared to airline credit cards that may offer benefits you'll use sparingly.

If you feel my rebutting of Killian's skyrocketry regarding Knoblauch et al (2018) is» exaggerating, misrepresenting, or just completely fabricating someone's argument» so as to make it» much easier to present (my) own position as being reasonable» and that» this kind of dishonesty serves to undermine honest rational debate»; if you feel all that, you would have more sympathy from me if you were able to demonstrate this alleged» dishonesty», or even better begin by demonstrating some justification for the skyrocketry.

By exaggerating, misrepresenting, or just completely fabricating someone's argument, it's much easier to present your own position as being reasonable, but this kind of dishonesty serves to undermine honest rational debate.

[Response: Yes, it is much easier to be a GW skeptic than to think for yourself and try to understand the scientific arguments.

Much easier to win that argument.

And even then it is not easy — look only how hard lived is that stupid argument that the GHE for the Earth represents 33 °C that makes about as much sense as saying that a parabole is approximated by a horizontal line over the whole space.

Doing so can not be easy, since internet discussions typically vary wildly in terms of quality and coherence, and ad hominem attacks are quite high in web - based paleoclimate discussions, making it hard to know how much personal acrimony tints the arguments.

Once they toss out all the ice core data their argument becomes much easier as the ice core data shows that CO2 increases coincide with the industrial revolution and that CO2 levels are much higher now than in the past.

So much easier, that, than producing a scientific argument.

This blog has pointed out, however, that environmentalism is at least as much an attempt to circumnavigate problems of democratic legitimacy as it is a response to environmental problems — that it is easier to take moral authority from scientific experts than it is to elicit from the governed the consent to govern in lieu of a convincing argument.

How much easier is it on the psyche for Blair et al to avoid reflecting on why people didn't trust them personally (e.g WMD / 45 minutes) and didn't believe their arguments (e.g remember the «immediate recession» almost the entire economics profession predicted?)

When targets are clear and accomplishments are tracked, it is much easier to make the argument for a raise — even if the company policy is «cost of living adjustments only across the board.»

Once you realize some arguments can never be won, it makes them that much easier to drop.

How much easier solving arguments is.

So in a sense, even if you do calm down after being upset, you've still lost, because those biochemicals are going to hang out in your brain, making arguments or emotional withdrawal much easier.