Not exact matches
In this respect its
history in Britain is as
much the story of political expediency as one of
economic principles in the abstract.
But as Temin and Vines show,
history is
much more usefully seen as the evolution of often complex institutions — financial, political, legal, cultural, and so on — through which
economic behavior is mediated and which affect the ways in which recurring patterns of finance, commerce and trade unfold, and that without an understanding of
history we lose so
much complexity in our models that we often end up making very obvious mistakes.
No wonder those folks don't care
much for
history of
economic thought!
The latter case describes the
economic history of the United States during
much of the nineteenth century.
As
much as American religion is «American,» it is also local, shaped by the particular
history of immigration and
economic forces of each place, as well as the particular landscape that often fires religious imaginations.
In other essays, there is
much talk of usury, but almost no awareness of the underlying
economic and social issues, or even of the
history of the debate.
Whether the preacher will mediate a world of transformation or equilibrium depends on many things, including what the preacher reads, with whom the preacher eats, the
economic history of the preacher, and
much else.
Can you think of anything else in human
history that has caused so
much unnecessary human suffering as unjust
economic structures?
But my point here is that unsatisfactory
economic ideas and practices which have an impressive
history of failure, which caused to founder that great nation California, which lie at the root of
much of the shame and dread and division and hostility and cynicism with which our society is presently afflicted, are treated as immutable truths, not to be questioned, not to be interfered with, lest they unleash their terrible retribution, recoiling against whomever would lay a hand on the Ark of Market Economics, if that is the name under which this mighty power is currently invoked.
Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it...
much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied
history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply changing the formation or bringing in one or two individuals... this team needs fundamental change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present
economic climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!
After all, the family house we are exiting still contains
much of our
history and family silver, as well as our future
economic interest.
In U.S.
history, the two most notable efforts to develop religious communities that served
much of the role of the welfare state to its members that most developed countries provided through government to its citizens, have been the Roman Catholic Church, which has developed a large parallel education and health care system, and the Church of the Latter Day Saints, which uses tithes to finance a wide variety of services and
economic supports for members of the Mormon community.
Now ask yourself how many regimes have borrowed as
much as this one in the
history of Nigeria, how many regimes have constructed less roads, recorded less
economic growth, less infrastructural development, less investment in efucation and health, less employment, less industrial development, less foreign investment, less coordination.
If we can tell people the realities, we can enter the greatest period of
economic growth ever seen (never before in
history have we known as
much about how to invest effectively as we know today).
Again,
history's not likely to be
much of a guide, since the Fed will be responding to changes in inflation and
economic growth as they come along.
In short, he was very
much attuned to the mid-19th century world, to its
economic and technological development, to its concerns with the lessons of
history and the nation's future prospects, to its debates about the contribution of art to civil society and to reflections on the nature of painting.
While celebrating strong
economic growth in recent years, Cambodia is a country where
much remains buried in
history and time.
That, frankly, flies in the face of all
economic history, and pretty
much everything we know about human nature.
''...
History will not judge us by how
much economic growth we achieve in the immediate years ahead, nor by how
much we expand material consumption, but by the legacy we leave for our children, grandchildren and their grandchildren.
If it survives at all, it is likely to be - as earlier in
history - an activity for a
much smaller
economic elite.»
Part of my reason for thinking China will not be able to avoid such crises is a fundamental dynamic that Fukuyama discussed in his
much - misunderstood «The End of
History»:
economic development requires openness and the protection of individual rights in various dimensions, and this creates an inescapable tension between an elite desire for
economic dynamism and technological progress viz competitor Powers, and an elite fear of openness and what it brings politically / culturally.
Entries are extensive, with specifics on
history and geography of the area; home prices; schools, libraries, and other cultural amenities; air quality; taxes;
economic and employment data; and
much more.