Sentences with phrase «much effect either»

I agree that is very much the effect I am after, I just LOVE it!

I don't think this change will really have much effect on the real estate industry.

All parties are promising the creation of jobs in their election manifestos but how much effect any government party can have in a short to medium timescale is questionable.

We're unsure how much effect this would have on U.S. - China relations or either company's bottom line, but it surely can't be good news.

Although fees have risen quite dramatically from where they were a year or two ago, it's unclear how much effect this has on the digital gold use case, which some believe provides the largest amount of support for the bitcoin price — and therefore keeps miners happy, too.

An iPhone 4 - like flick of the thumb has about as much effect as attacking The Incredible Hulk with a Polo mint.

But too little has been borrowed to have much effect on the general economy.

He doesn't even believe Google will have much effect on the independent agent market share — or at least he hopes that it won't.

It did not, however, have much effect on the case — but not, again, because the courts ignored history.

How much effect did the echo chamber have?

But, to be of much effect, they need to take place within some sort of wider supportive context.

One would not expect to see much effect in areas where (a) snow was on ground year - round or (b) where it never snowed, but where snow was seasonal.

Please state how much effect the sun's activity has on this system compared to CO2.

They occur in high numbers and their own predators, such as feral cats, do not have much effect on controlling possum population size.

My point with the black balls is that the ratio to the volume of water is miniscule... they can not have much effect due to the small quantity....

I just don't expect it to have much effect on the course of AGW by itself.

As I've already demonstrated, CO2 levels were too low to have much effect on either temperatures or sea level prior to the 1950's...

In the case of atmospheric calculations with water vapour so dominant I'm not sure how much effect a correction would have.

This movement of energy is achieved mainly by convection of one sort or another, and since the temperature of the ocean is little affected by back radiation, changes in co2 concentration can't have much effect.

Just how much effect have all those peer - reviewed slam - dunks had?

With Stephen's proposal, it would be more like having the group of people walk a pace away instead of 100 meters, so I agree there would not be much effect, but there would be some.

Jeffrey, there is little evidence that CO2 has much effect on temperature.

Few scientists would contend that all or most of the Earth's warming before mankind had much effect on GHG levels was anthropogenic.

Below the tropopause the behaviour of the oceans and the speed of the hydrological cycle will suffice but that won't have much effect above the tropopause.

Until Phil Jones provides the underlying data, neither you nor I know how much an effect the UHI islands are making.

Mass change due to conceivable fossil fuel loading (up to say 16 × CO2) is unlikely to have much effect, but sensitivity is probably underestimated at high CO2 amounts owing to self - broadening of CO2 absorption lines.

And there was a smaller volcanic eruption a decade or so before my starting 1871 - 1880 period, which would have had perhaps 25 % -30 % as much effect during that decade.

Sincerely I don't see solar wind having much effect on volcanoes.

You are saying this is not the dominant effect in the warming so far, and that even growing this forcing to 5 - 7 W / m2 is not going to have much effect, right?

In other words the adjustments don't have that much effect on the warming / cooling trends over and above those evident in the raw data.

This is comparable with some of the largest paleoclimate changes that took millions of years to happen, but you don't expect this to have as much effect this time for some reason possibly related to cosmic rays.

Once most scientists become convinced that CO2 can not have that much effect on climate this is all going to be extremely easy to undo.

How much effect is left?

The models thus can only predict a small perturbation of the system (with not much effect on clouds).

This is a big unknown, and it is not known how much effect and at what latitudes might happen.

I wouldn't expect a dip in the aerosol forcing in the middle of that period to have much effect.

You can come up with numbers like 7 C by seeing how much effect removing CO2 has on the outgoing radiation, which is 27 W / m2 for a standard sounding, equating to needing 7 degrees cooling to restore the balance.

But with a world - wide oil glut that shows no signs of easing, observers including Sklar think lifting the export ban won't have much effect in the near term.

The main point is that they do not have much effect on composite blackbodies.

If there's one thing everybody knows about carbon pricing, it's that there's not much effect on consumption of transportation fuels.

I also did PCA including normalization, and I detrended the series before PCA, neither had much effect (the order of the low - variance PCs was changed but the PCs themselves were nearly identical except of course for trend).]

A 100 W heater would not have much effect on 100 tons of water.

But unless the albedo changes quite a lot there's not usually much effect on average temperatures.

So they funded a good deal of research into the question of just how much effect CO2 would have.

If the cap is too high / cautious, as has been the case in virtually every other cap - and - trade system to date, carbon prices will stay low and the system won't have much effect.

And how much effect can we mitigate it?

As far as i can tell, neither of them are going to have much effect in fifty or a hundred or a hundred and fifty years either.

So removing one station won't have much effect if «adjacent» stations are showing similar long term changes.

The analysis needs updating, but the punchline is that there is not much effect of these Arctic wide (although some big regional effects).

So the airports that are most likely to have a significant impact need to be and remain rural, be so big that moderating effects from the surrounding countryside don't have much effect, and be expanding so that their bias keeps growing and thus isn't compensated out by the analysis method.