Sentences with phrase «much energy what»

Not exact matches

If you can predict what your boss is going to do that means you don't have to spend as much energy managing that relationship, dealing with their meddling, and justifying your actions.
Chances are, though, that you've got too much energy, and too many «what if» ambitions, to commit to leisure full time.
Instead of evaluating the decision based solely on the percentage of payroll costs it will save, consider how much of your time, energy and management efforts will be saved and what that would mean for your business.
Plus, much like to - do lists, rushing to do whatever is in front of you can mean spending your energies on what's visible or urgent rather than what's important.
Bill Schultz: What you're seeing are valuations coming into play, for energy in particular, where they're much more reasonable than other areas.
What has brought big batteries to the fore is not new technology so much as the demand created by the growth in renewable energy.
The nature of the task doesn't matter as much as the simple fact they're willing to invest time and energy into learning more about what you offer.
As I mentioned earlier, what you feed your body affects how much energy the prefrontal cortex has to work with.
On Monday, Alberta introduced legislation that allows the energy minister to use export permits to tell truckers, pipeline companies and rail operators how much of what products can be shipped when and where.
US to dominate oil industry in 5 years, IEA reports How much investment is needed in energy US shale output is surging, here's what will keep the boom going
For example, I'd like to know how much energy, and what types of energy, are produced and consumed by various countries, for specific industries and consumers, how this is changing over time, and what inputs go into these energy sources and how those costs are changing.
One word that makes us happy: Progress [21:21] We grow because that helps us give more — share it with someone you love, it magnifies it [22:04] More excited about feeding one billion people than any material thing, so much more meaning when it's not just about you [22:19] The challenge is our brain: it's looking for what's wrong, because that helps you survive [22:30] Peak state = high energy, feel extraordinary, producing results is easy [22:46] Low energy state = say things and do things that hurt your relationship [23:39] Peak State = Beautiful state, Low - energy state = suffering state [24:08] Over achievers don't suffer, right?
«We see a Chinese economy gradually shifting from construction to consumption, and so, we will transition,» said Mackenzie adding that «We imagine we will continue to creep our exports of steelmaking materials like metallurgical coal and iron ore, but we're much more likely to make major investments in what we feel are the next phase of China's growth in energy and in food.»
Incorporating energy, the environment, economics and Indigenous communities, Pfeiffer's project is a model for much of what the SEDV program espouses.
Interestingly that's pretty much what Unifor, Canada's largest private sector union and largest energy industry union, has been saying for years.
Rather it would give the energy minister the power to determine what type of oil and how much of it is transported, and by which method (pipeline or rail).
Some days (especially in the beginning) we were exhausted, but loving what we do energizes us to keep going and our clients bring so much fantastic energy to our studio.
I pray to whichever holy name (God, Allah, Jehovah, Krishna, Jesus, etc.) suits the ONE Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent being that ignorance is wiped away from our species and we become a closer, more loving, peaceful creature and that we realize how much time we waste and how much further we push our fellow neighbor and brother under God, regardless of creed, away debating over who's God is better and discover the error of our ways before we destroy each other... before it's too late, because The End is Nigh!!!!! LOL!!!!! Really though, isn't the world full of enough tragedy, and aren't their so many more important things that need our energy and attention like the innocent children in Pakistan dying from diseases from the flood or the homeless children in our own country, or the lack of education, which is exactly what leads to this kind of debate?
So, you admit that each generation could change them and therefore you DO N'T know what the earliest one said, much less beginnin with the creation of matter, energy and time.
@ Live4Him: «So, you admit that each generation could change them and therefore you DO N'T know what the earliest one said, much less beginnin with the creation of matter, energy and time.»
Much of what environmentalists were saying seemed to call for a redirection of energies from issues of justice to those of preserving the environment.
Hartshorne notoriously has spent much time and energy in advancing what he regards as valid forms of the ontological argument.
If all you people that spend so much energy like Rush Dumball living your lives to hate others, just think what this world could be like if you spent that energy doing the opposite?!
What I have particularly in mind is that while there is much talk about taking Jesus as a key to the interpretation of human nature, as it is often phrased, or to the meaning of human life, or to the point of man's existential situation, there is a lamentable tendency to stop there and not to go on to talk about «the world» — by which Miss Emmet meant, I assume, the totality of things including physical nature; in other words the cosmos in its basic structure and its chief dynamic energy.
What's more, they at least recognized that much of the moral energy that could be directed to the common good resided in the pews.
One day, probably not in the near future judging by how much unspent energy there still is to tap, we will simply give up trying to fix what our ancestors broke, and just admit that our good intentions are just as naive and interfering as theirs were.
How much and what kind of energy?
So many pastors spend so much time and energy and focus on the person in the pew, and then what happens to the gospel?
The prospect of what some have called «the colonization of the womb» and the enormity of the problems looming on the horizon should stir us all to outrage at the concentration of so much energy and so many resources, so much sound and fury, on the abortion issue.
fred likes the quantun physics argument, because most people don't even know what quantum mechanics deal with, which is mainly a mathematical description of much of the dual particle - like and wave - like behavior and interactions of energy and matter.
Maybe the little energy kick I get from it is what makes it appeal so much to me?
After a long overnight flight home with very little sleep I haven't had the energy for anything much today so I've been catching up on what's been happening in the blogosphere and planning more recipes of my own to share soon.
Well hey, it's summer and my kids burn so much energy playing outside in the pool, I figured «what the heck, dig in, dudes».
What a lovely calendar for me and my friends I am the Moonchild myself and always been inspired by and affected by the moon My cycle and my moods and energy and my sleep is influenced very much by the moon New moon giving me a fresh energy and full moon feeling like wanting to deep sleep more
In this interview, Satsuki tells us about her morning, bedtime, and exercise routines, as well as love as a form of self - acceptance, what it's like to see the energy of others, her unique approach to her life schedule, her mother's universally wise beauty advice, the lifestyle change that helped clear up her skin, nourishment, stress, and so much more.
In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)
What would have been expected would have been a high energy, goal threat, assist master, who thrives off pressure, but what arsenal have been accustom to over the past years from Ozil are, breaks under pressure, lack energetic drives, not much of a goal threat and slow down plays constanWhat would have been expected would have been a high energy, goal threat, assist master, who thrives off pressure, but what arsenal have been accustom to over the past years from Ozil are, breaks under pressure, lack energetic drives, not much of a goal threat and slow down plays constanwhat arsenal have been accustom to over the past years from Ozil are, breaks under pressure, lack energetic drives, not much of a goal threat and slow down plays constantly.
I hear what you say regarding «Ospina or De Gea» or «Ospina or Courtois» etc but, and I think you say as much afterwards, these are not real - world options so it is pretty much wasted energy to ponder these hypothetical questions.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
What you're about to do takes so much energy that you can't waste any.
What confuses me is how much time and energy people spend pining for days of yesteryear, when we have something very special directly in front of us.
I can only hope that this attempt is taken more seriously than the largely muted and clearly unsuccessful protests of late last season... although the plane writing escapade brought some much - needed attention to the matter, it failed to resonate with fence - sitters and those who had just recently fell off the Wenger truck... without a big enough showing of support the whole endeavor appeared relatively weak and poorly organized, especially to the major media outlets, whose involvement could have significantly changed what was to follow... but I get it, few wanted to turn on their club, let alone make a public display of their discord... problem is, they are preying on that vulnerability, in fact, their counting on you to keep your thoughts to yourself... who are you to tell these fat cats how to steal your money... they have worked long and hard to pull the wool over your eyes... they even went so far as to pay enormous sums of cash to your once beloved professor to be their corporate spokesmodel so that the whole thing would be more palatable... eventually the club made it appear as if this was simply a relatively small fringe group of highly radicalized supporters, which allowed the pro-Wenger element inside the club hierarchy to claim victory following the FA Cup win... unfortunately what has happened to this club can't be solved by FA Cups or a few players coming in, the very culture of this club needs to be changed and that starts at the top... in order to change the unhealthy and dysfunctional narrative that has absorbed this club we need to remove everyone who presently occupies a position of power... only then can we get back to the business of playing championship caliber football, which should always be the number one priority of this organization... on an important side note, one of the most devastating mistakes made in the final days of this hectic and poorly planned transfer window didn't have to do with the big name players like Sanchez or Lemar, but the fact that they failed to secure Jadon Sancho, who might even start for Dortmund this season... I think they might seriously regret this oversight... instead of spending so much time, energy and manpower pretending that they were desperately trying to make big moves, they once again lost the plot due to their all too familiar tunnel vision
He might not catch the eye as much as Eriksen's guile, Son's energy or the way Lamela entirely over-exuberantly rolls his foot over the ball to absolutely no effect, but he's a midfielder who perpetually gets goals, and what else do you need?
We live in a society of busy - ness, with so mich expected of parents and so much to get on and do and so much pressure, that a EC is an inconvenience of having to go against the perceived norm, having to pay much more intimate attention to our babies, having to deal with bodily functions, having to wake ourselves up a bit to what our culture has conditioned us to and having to go against the grain — all of which take effort and all of which take time and / or energy away from other mummy efforts that bring more obvious and societally rewarded benefits.
An important way children learn to be independent is through establishing independence about feeding, so as long as your child is growing normally and has plenty of energy to get through a day of play there's probably no reason to worry about what she eats or how much.
So, I'm really trying not to spend too much ink or emotional energy on this one, but... Yesterday, it was widely reported that New Jersey governor Chris Christie was asked by an 11 - year - old boy on the campaign trail what he'd do about school food... [Continue reading]
What are your water and energy bills like using that much hot water?
If you want to help your baby relax while sleeping without costing too much on your monthly electric bill, this energy efficient humidifier is what you need.
There just isn't much mental energy left to recall in fine detail what it was like to parent a toddler.
However, once they start learning what they should be eating, their energy levels go way up, and their growing baby is much happier and healthier.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z