Sentences with phrase «much every reasoned view»

540ppm is a lot of stress from pretty much every reasoned view that has examined it.

Not exact matches

For two reasons: (a) to avoid conflicts and different agendas or inconsistent views on how to move the business forward down the line, and (b) because, if you're all - in, the upside (if indeed there is any) is much greater than if you hedge your bets.
In Camp's view, that's no reason to panic, because «no» is a much better answer than «maybe.»
Their business model is a digital advertising business model, and the reason why Facebook and Google had more than a 90 percent share of growth in the digital advertising space last year is that they can target advertising in a way that no other site can because they have a 360 - degree view of user activity, meaning they're tracking users across the web and therefore know much more about their users than anyone else.
Much more plausible is the view that, for reasons rooted in technological and demographic change and reinforced by greater regulation of the financial sector, the global economy has difficulty generating demand for all that can be produced.
Wells begins by positing two kinds of spirituality present within evangelicalism, distinguished in his view not so much by different doctrinal starting - points as differing priorities assigned to moral reasoning.
Suddenly, there are competing views of «right»... this is one of the reasons why organized church very much wants a homogenous theology.
Gary: The reason I'm hesitant about your definition of «religious» is because, as you say, your definition has everything to do with your personal views and beliefs, and not as much to do with how people who call themselves religious perceive themselves, nor with the 150 or so years of academic research into religious phenomena.
I have no reason to believe that the other world religions are much different from the Graeco - Judaeo - Roman melange in this regard, bearing in mind that the Jews, Greeks, and Romans influenced one another and that all were deeply affected by still earlier Asiatic world views like Zoroastrianism.
And that is much more useful than David simply providing a new definition for two reasons: he's seeking not necessarily to redefine, but to challenge already existing inconsistencies between our use of the words and how people actually function, AND because such terms are given their meaning collectively so redefining it alone would be meaningless because it wouldn't draw on people's real experience with their beliefs and views of the labels.
For reasons such as the latter even Simpson, in 1911, declared that continuing insistence for the traditional materialistic view of resurrection «accounts for much repugnance to the Christian truth».21
But precisely for this reason all Christians do not only receive a complete and supposedly concrete natural law which is communicated to them by the official representatives of the Church, they also find out for them - selves the actual requirements of public life, so that all may have as much freedom as possible, a freedom that can act with God in view and thus create that personal finality which receives God himself as its eternal meaning.
Outlining as such has enjoyed too much prominence in the history of preaching and of teaching homiletics, obviously for the reason that a sermon has been viewed as a rational discourse rather than as a community event.
But it may be of interest to note that Lord Acton, who can hardly be accused (as Kagan is) of advancing a «secular» view of history (still less of being a deconstructionist), has the highest praise for Pericles, and for much the same reasons as Kagan.
I believe that this experience is typical of much that is going on today, and this is one of the reasons that in this first part of the present book I seek to give a bird's - eye view of process thought with continual reference to the many different areas of human interest.
Aside from the fact that this is an example of that penal substitution view rearing it's head, for in this view, God hates sin, and is angry at sinners, and so must kill His Son as a way to appease His own wrath against sin (which doesn't make much biblical or theological sense), the real reason I was shocked to read this statement is because it is the exact opposite of what Paul actually says in Romans 8:32!
This picture that God is understood by way of the affections tends to have much the same cultural location as does the view that God is understood by way of discursive reasoning or scientia: It is a culture marked by the high differentiation and specialization of social roles characteristic of urban societies and their economics, considerable pluralism of subcultures and worldviews, social fragmentation, personal anonymity, and rootlessness.
What strikes me on rereading that exchange is how much their debate hinged on a proper interpretation of Milton, with Fish insisting on the same views now developed at fuller length in How Milton Works, and Neuhaus insisting that Milton would agree with his own assertion that «one's decision for a «first premise» is a reasoned decision.»
A positive and optimistic view of Arsenal, the current campaign and the chances of Arsenal winning the Premier League title in next season might not carry as much weight when it comes from one of players in the Arsenal squad, but the reason suggested by Per Mertesacker for the struggles of the Gunners this season is the same one suggested earlier this week by the West Brom boss Tony Pulis, our awful injury record.
ALBANY — Green groups and business interests don't agree on much, but both view Gov. Andrew Cuomo's recent decisions on natural gas infrastructure like pipelines as inconsistent and problematic, albeit for different reasons.
China having power and presence is one of the obvious reasons for this shift in this region, however if we look at it more closely then we see that the former president Mr. Mohamed Nasheed was pretty much in favor of an «India First» foreign policy in fact he has been quoted saying «India - first foreign policy approach is probably the only sensible foreign policy view that we should have in the Indian Ocean».
In my view, that mismatch alone is reason not to put too much credence in Schmittner's claim to have trimmed of the upper end of the IPCC climate sensitivity tail.
For that reason, any answer you get to the question of «how much muscle can I gain» will always be a rough approximation and should be viewed as such.
Another reason I prefer this is that it is a more comprehensive view of glucose tolerance and I even get to see what foods cause higher spikes for me personally and which don't affect it as much at all.
In my view the main reason there is so much contradictory information in the nutrition world stems from the fact that much of modern medical thought has been tainted by the cholesterol theory of heart disease, which many of us now know is not supported by science.
Hi, yes its strange to some but not to scientists.Actually there is not really that much connection between fat and heart disease at all.It was Ancel Benjamin Keys that came up with that dubious «Seven Countries» studies.My own view is that meat for people with established heart disease is probably not a good idea.The reason being is that people with established heart disease usually got there either by bad genetics, or by bad dietary and lifestyle choices over a number of years.Meat and fat is know to reduce blood flow and constrict the arteries which in healthy people may be of no immediate harm.However in someone with known heart disease any constriction and lack of blood flow to and from the heart is NOT a good idea obviously.
Two Bees In A Pod, Cedar Hill Farmhouse, Between Naps on the Porch, Coastal Charm, Brepurposed, Burlap and Babies, I Should Be Mopping the Floor, My Uncommon Slice of Suburbia, Cozy Little House, Setting For Four, Happy House and Home, Love Grows Wild, Beyond The Picket Fence, The Simple Life Of A Firewife, A Night Owl, A Pinch Of Joy, Keeping It Simple, Huckleberry Love, A Stroll Thru Life, Just A Girl And Her Blog, Home Stories A to Z, Tiny Sidekick, Tip Junkie, The Sits Girls, House On The Way, Hope Studios, Savvy Southern Style, The Turquoise Home, The Real Housewives of Riverton, Someday Crafts, Crafty Allie, Cherished Bliss, Snap Creativity, The Blissful Bee, Family Home and Life, The Thrifty Home, Made In A Day, Seven Alive, Live Laugh Rowe, Liz Marie Blog, City Farmhouse, Sweet Haute, Chic California, The Pin Junkie, A Delightsome Life, Craftberry Bush, Joy In Our Home, Glitter Glue and Paint, A Glimpse Inside, Too Much Time On My Hands, Posed Perfection, The Pin Junkie, From My Front Porch To Yours, Table + Hearth, All That's Jas, The Shabby Nest, My Romantic Home, French Country Cottage, The Girl Creative, The 36th Avenue, Lolly Jane, I'm Not A Trophy Wife, The Charm of Home, I Heart Naptime, The Cottage Market, Six Sisters Stuff, Be Different Act Normal, Reasons To Skip The Housework, Funky Junk, It's Overflowing, A Little Clairification, The Girl Creative, Reasons To Skip The Housework, Thoughts From Alice, View From The Fridge, Under The Table, Delineate Your Dwelling, The DIY Showoff
I haven't been wearing skirts recently, really for no other reason than I can't be arsed with them — I'd much rather slither myself into a pair of jeans and go on with my life... View Post
The detailed accounts of how Ukrainian women view dating and marriage and thought provoking and grab your attention, as much of the information is a blend of first hand accounts and proven research helping to explain the reasons why some men fare better than others when dating and eventually marrying Ukrainian women.
There is an eventual confrontation between the forces of reason and those of madness, but the story veers a little too much away from Brad's point of view to remain entirely engaging.
His script and direction are perfect for this story, I know he does things for a reason and I know I will get so much more out of this upon repeating viewings.
Well said Sbbarina The voice of reason it may well be but, I wouldnt expect much support from people of Britain who genuinely think others actually view them as «better» solely because of the car they drive??? ****, **** and **** yes but better?
Another reason why the Model 3 is attracting so much hype is because people view it as a more affordable way to access Tesla tech, like the vaunted Autopilot system.
EMH is a fraud, IMHO Check out Andrew Lo's AMH for a much more reasoned view.
In their view, the reason for the lack of restraint in the financial markets was that there was simply too much cheap money available on the market.
Like always the actual price of this product won't affect the score the end of this review too much, for two very distinct reasons: the first is that I get many of the games and products that I review on this site for free, and this I am not the best person to be judging value as I did not spend money on it, and second because I firmly believe that what I view as a good value for money may not be what you view as good value for money.
But technocracy abolishes competing accounts of the world: it says that hoi - polloi is not competent, either to form a view of the world, or to make decisions about their own lives or public matters; and as the climate debate shows, unofficial interpretations of The Science are waved away as so much «motivated reasoning» and the such like.
A major part of the present climate research would not be there without the «political reasons», i.e. the willingness of politically controlled organizations to fund such research much more than it would be funded in absence of the widely accepted view that AGW is a very serious and possibly the most important risk to humanity.
Leave fallacious arguments such as reasoning that she «can't» respond to Gavin (she has provided ample evidence that she's quite capable of responding to Gavin with great confidence — and much support from her «denizens» that her view on the science is superior to his) to SWIRLCAREs.
Lucas's views on animals in medical research (the kind which continues to save millions of people's lives, yet which Lucas wants to ban because she believes it to be «scientifically unsound») are interesting for much the same reasons.
Summing up this brief insight, Conway's Limits of Legal Reasoning is in my view definitely a much - needed, thought - provoking contribution to EU law scholarship, whether you find yourself in agreement with Conway's conclusions or not.
So too the Court was of the view, it seems, that because partners have a sort of «tenure» (i.e. are much more difficult to fire), this was a reason to take their removal from the partnership less seriously, rather than more seriously.
In a court case with a jury, many of those selected may be unaware of the reasons for the defendant's actions, mainly because they are uncertain how much the condition impacts on that individual's view of the world.
The problem is not that they are valueless, but that they are much less valuable and much less genuinely respectful of serious attachment to either facts or reasoned elaboration than they appear to be, much more susceptible to «bullshitting,» and in the end, in my view, more damaging than some fake story on Facebook to serious discourse or an attachment to integrity and seriousness in thinking and argument.
For the reasons set out above, this campaign is in my view inimical to the public interest — although it is very much in the interests of those groups who are making disproportionate profits out of the current arrangements.
With much of the Google buzz at CES being centered around Google's smart assistant and its integration into multiple devices, it might be that the reason we haven't seen a Google - built smart speaker with a screen (like the Amazon Echo Show or JBL View Link) is because Google is planning to integrate this technology into a possible Google Home View — though that's pure speculation at this time.
In my view, a secondary reason why so much material fails the acid test of experience is that organizations such as the International Society for Mental Health Online are so widely viewed as thriving hotbeds of activity by those outside the field — i.e., by those who are not able to draw on their own direct experience of online therapy or online counselling in order to evaluate such organizations.
In my view, the primary reason so much training for online therapy — and so much published material on the topic of online therapy — fails the acid test of experience is that not nearly as much actual online clinical work goes on as those selling training programmes would have us believe.
However, in recent years my focus and reason for researching commitment has evolved to a much more systemic view.
Anyway, in my view, this new listing plan gives much reason for all registered real estate people to celebrate, as the plan is full of holes and as such subject to abuse.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z