540ppm is a lot of stress from pretty
much every reasoned view that has examined it.
Not exact matches
For two
reasons: (a) to avoid conflicts and different agendas or inconsistent
views on how to move the business forward down the line, and (b) because, if you're all - in, the upside (if indeed there is any) is
much greater than if you hedge your bets.
In Camp's
view, that's no
reason to panic, because «no» is a
much better answer than «maybe.»
Their business model is a digital advertising business model, and the
reason why Facebook and Google had more than a 90 percent share of growth in the digital advertising space last year is that they can target advertising in a way that no other site can because they have a 360 - degree
view of user activity, meaning they're tracking users across the web and therefore know
much more about their users than anyone else.
Much more plausible is the
view that, for
reasons rooted in technological and demographic change and reinforced by greater regulation of the financial sector, the global economy has difficulty generating demand for all that can be produced.
Wells begins by positing two kinds of spirituality present within evangelicalism, distinguished in his
view not so
much by different doctrinal starting - points as differing priorities assigned to moral
reasoning.
Suddenly, there are competing
views of «right»... this is one of the
reasons why organized church very
much wants a homogenous theology.
Gary: The
reason I'm hesitant about your definition of «religious» is because, as you say, your definition has everything to do with your personal
views and beliefs, and not as
much to do with how people who call themselves religious perceive themselves, nor with the 150 or so years of academic research into religious phenomena.
I have no
reason to believe that the other world religions are
much different from the Graeco - Judaeo - Roman melange in this regard, bearing in mind that the Jews, Greeks, and Romans influenced one another and that all were deeply affected by still earlier Asiatic world
views like Zoroastrianism.
And that is
much more useful than David simply providing a new definition for two
reasons: he's seeking not necessarily to redefine, but to challenge already existing inconsistencies between our use of the words and how people actually function, AND because such terms are given their meaning collectively so redefining it alone would be meaningless because it wouldn't draw on people's real experience with their beliefs and
views of the labels.
For
reasons such as the latter even Simpson, in 1911, declared that continuing insistence for the traditional materialistic
view of resurrection «accounts for
much repugnance to the Christian truth».21
But precisely for this
reason all Christians do not only receive a complete and supposedly concrete natural law which is communicated to them by the official representatives of the Church, they also find out for them - selves the actual requirements of public life, so that all may have as
much freedom as possible, a freedom that can act with God in
view and thus create that personal finality which receives God himself as its eternal meaning.
Outlining as such has enjoyed too
much prominence in the history of preaching and of teaching homiletics, obviously for the
reason that a sermon has been
viewed as a rational discourse rather than as a community event.
But it may be of interest to note that Lord Acton, who can hardly be accused (as Kagan is) of advancing a «secular»
view of history (still less of being a deconstructionist), has the highest praise for Pericles, and for
much the same
reasons as Kagan.
I believe that this experience is typical of
much that is going on today, and this is one of the
reasons that in this first part of the present book I seek to give a bird's - eye
view of process thought with continual reference to the many different areas of human interest.
Aside from the fact that this is an example of that penal substitution
view rearing it's head, for in this
view, God hates sin, and is angry at sinners, and so must kill His Son as a way to appease His own wrath against sin (which doesn't make
much biblical or theological sense), the real
reason I was shocked to read this statement is because it is the exact opposite of what Paul actually says in Romans 8:32!
This picture that God is understood by way of the affections tends to have
much the same cultural location as does the
view that God is understood by way of discursive
reasoning or scientia: It is a culture marked by the high differentiation and specialization of social roles characteristic of urban societies and their economics, considerable pluralism of subcultures and worldviews, social fragmentation, personal anonymity, and rootlessness.
What strikes me on rereading that exchange is how
much their debate hinged on a proper interpretation of Milton, with Fish insisting on the same
views now developed at fuller length in How Milton Works, and Neuhaus insisting that Milton would agree with his own assertion that «one's decision for a «first premise» is a
reasoned decision.»
A positive and optimistic
view of Arsenal, the current campaign and the chances of Arsenal winning the Premier League title in next season might not carry as
much weight when it comes from one of players in the Arsenal squad, but the
reason suggested by Per Mertesacker for the struggles of the Gunners this season is the same one suggested earlier this week by the West Brom boss Tony Pulis, our awful injury record.
ALBANY — Green groups and business interests don't agree on
much, but both
view Gov. Andrew Cuomo's recent decisions on natural gas infrastructure like pipelines as inconsistent and problematic, albeit for different
reasons.
China having power and presence is one of the obvious
reasons for this shift in this region, however if we look at it more closely then we see that the former president Mr. Mohamed Nasheed was pretty
much in favor of an «India First» foreign policy in fact he has been quoted saying «India - first foreign policy approach is probably the only sensible foreign policy
view that we should have in the Indian Ocean».
In my
view, that mismatch alone is
reason not to put too
much credence in Schmittner's claim to have trimmed of the upper end of the IPCC climate sensitivity tail.
For that
reason, any answer you get to the question of «how
much muscle can I gain» will always be a rough approximation and should be
viewed as such.
Another
reason I prefer this is that it is a more comprehensive
view of glucose tolerance and I even get to see what foods cause higher spikes for me personally and which don't affect it as
much at all.
In my
view the main
reason there is so
much contradictory information in the nutrition world stems from the fact that
much of modern medical thought has been tainted by the cholesterol theory of heart disease, which many of us now know is not supported by science.
Hi, yes its strange to some but not to scientists.Actually there is not really that
much connection between fat and heart disease at all.It was Ancel Benjamin Keys that came up with that dubious «Seven Countries» studies.My own
view is that meat for people with established heart disease is probably not a good idea.The
reason being is that people with established heart disease usually got there either by bad genetics, or by bad dietary and lifestyle choices over a number of years.Meat and fat is know to reduce blood flow and constrict the arteries which in healthy people may be of no immediate harm.However in someone with known heart disease any constriction and lack of blood flow to and from the heart is NOT a good idea obviously.
Two Bees In A Pod, Cedar Hill Farmhouse, Between Naps on the Porch, Coastal Charm, Brepurposed, Burlap and Babies, I Should Be Mopping the Floor, My Uncommon Slice of Suburbia, Cozy Little House, Setting For Four, Happy House and Home, Love Grows Wild, Beyond The Picket Fence, The Simple Life Of A Firewife, A Night Owl, A Pinch Of Joy, Keeping It Simple, Huckleberry Love, A Stroll Thru Life, Just A Girl And Her Blog, Home Stories A to Z, Tiny Sidekick, Tip Junkie, The Sits Girls, House On The Way, Hope Studios, Savvy Southern Style, The Turquoise Home, The Real Housewives of Riverton, Someday Crafts, Crafty Allie, Cherished Bliss, Snap Creativity, The Blissful Bee, Family Home and Life, The Thrifty Home, Made In A Day, Seven Alive, Live Laugh Rowe, Liz Marie Blog, City Farmhouse, Sweet Haute, Chic California, The Pin Junkie, A Delightsome Life, Craftberry Bush, Joy In Our Home, Glitter Glue and Paint, A Glimpse Inside, Too
Much Time On My Hands, Posed Perfection, The Pin Junkie, From My Front Porch To Yours, Table + Hearth, All That's Jas, The Shabby Nest, My Romantic Home, French Country Cottage, The Girl Creative, The 36th Avenue, Lolly Jane, I'm Not A Trophy Wife, The Charm of Home, I Heart Naptime, The Cottage Market, Six Sisters Stuff, Be Different Act Normal,
Reasons To Skip The Housework, Funky Junk, It's Overflowing, A Little Clairification, The Girl Creative,
Reasons To Skip The Housework, Thoughts From Alice,
View From The Fridge, Under The Table, Delineate Your Dwelling, The DIY Showoff
I haven't been wearing skirts recently, really for no other
reason than I can't be arsed with them — I'd
much rather slither myself into a pair of jeans and go on with my life...
View Post
The detailed accounts of how Ukrainian women
view dating and marriage and thought provoking and grab your attention, as
much of the information is a blend of first hand accounts and proven research helping to explain the
reasons why some men fare better than others when dating and eventually marrying Ukrainian women.
There is an eventual confrontation between the forces of
reason and those of madness, but the story veers a little too
much away from Brad's point of
view to remain entirely engaging.
His script and direction are perfect for this story, I know he does things for a
reason and I know I will get so
much more out of this upon repeating
viewings.
Well said Sbbarina The voice of
reason it may well be but, I wouldnt expect
much support from people of Britain who genuinely think others actually
view them as «better» solely because of the car they drive??? ****, **** and **** yes but better?
Another
reason why the Model 3 is attracting so
much hype is because people
view it as a more affordable way to access Tesla tech, like the vaunted Autopilot system.
EMH is a fraud, IMHO Check out Andrew Lo's AMH for a
much more
reasoned view.
In their
view, the
reason for the lack of restraint in the financial markets was that there was simply too
much cheap money available on the market.
Like always the actual price of this product won't affect the score the end of this review too
much, for two very distinct
reasons: the first is that I get many of the games and products that I review on this site for free, and this I am not the best person to be judging value as I did not spend money on it, and second because I firmly believe that what I
view as a good value for money may not be what you
view as good value for money.
But technocracy abolishes competing accounts of the world: it says that hoi - polloi is not competent, either to form a
view of the world, or to make decisions about their own lives or public matters; and as the climate debate shows, unofficial interpretations of The Science are waved away as so
much «motivated
reasoning» and the such like.
A major part of the present climate research would not be there without the «political
reasons», i.e. the willingness of politically controlled organizations to fund such research
much more than it would be funded in absence of the widely accepted
view that AGW is a very serious and possibly the most important risk to humanity.
Leave fallacious arguments such as
reasoning that she «can't» respond to Gavin (she has provided ample evidence that she's quite capable of responding to Gavin with great confidence — and
much support from her «denizens» that her
view on the science is superior to his) to SWIRLCAREs.
Lucas's
views on animals in medical research (the kind which continues to save millions of people's lives, yet which Lucas wants to ban because she believes it to be «scientifically unsound») are interesting for
much the same
reasons.
Summing up this brief insight, Conway's Limits of Legal
Reasoning is in my
view definitely a
much - needed, thought - provoking contribution to EU law scholarship, whether you find yourself in agreement with Conway's conclusions or not.
So too the Court was of the
view, it seems, that because partners have a sort of «tenure» (i.e. are
much more difficult to fire), this was a
reason to take their removal from the partnership less seriously, rather than more seriously.
In a court case with a jury, many of those selected may be unaware of the
reasons for the defendant's actions, mainly because they are uncertain how
much the condition impacts on that individual's
view of the world.
The problem is not that they are valueless, but that they are
much less valuable and
much less genuinely respectful of serious attachment to either facts or
reasoned elaboration than they appear to be,
much more susceptible to «bullshitting,» and in the end, in my
view, more damaging than some fake story on Facebook to serious discourse or an attachment to integrity and seriousness in thinking and argument.
For the
reasons set out above, this campaign is in my
view inimical to the public interest — although it is very
much in the interests of those groups who are making disproportionate profits out of the current arrangements.
With
much of the Google buzz at CES being centered around Google's smart assistant and its integration into multiple devices, it might be that the
reason we haven't seen a Google - built smart speaker with a screen (like the Amazon Echo Show or JBL
View Link) is because Google is planning to integrate this technology into a possible Google Home
View — though that's pure speculation at this time.
In my
view, a secondary
reason why so
much material fails the acid test of experience is that organizations such as the International Society for Mental Health Online are so widely
viewed as thriving hotbeds of activity by those outside the field — i.e., by those who are not able to draw on their own direct experience of online therapy or online counselling in order to evaluate such organizations.
In my
view, the primary
reason so
much training for online therapy — and so
much published material on the topic of online therapy — fails the acid test of experience is that not nearly as
much actual online clinical work goes on as those selling training programmes would have us believe.
However, in recent years my focus and
reason for researching commitment has evolved to a
much more systemic
view.
Anyway, in my
view, this new listing plan gives
much reason for all registered real estate people to celebrate, as the plan is full of holes and as such subject to abuse.