Sentences with phrase «much evidence exists»

Only in her last draft does she add: «Although medical opinion is divided on the question, much evidence exists to support the view that similar effects may occur in human tissues.»

Not exact matches

When an industry is undergoing a massive structural upheaval, one major revenue stream is already impaired — and now there are signs the second one may be as well — investors won't wait for final conclusive evidence to reevaluate how much they are willing to pay for the existing status quo cash flow streams.»

However, there does not appear to be much evidence that the demand for these investments is sufficient to create a yield gap between green and non-green bonds; tellingly, the province has not attempted to provide any information showing that a yield gap exists.

And yet, the Yahoo host has probably given at least as much help to him as any TV news channel, by providing evidence that the media conspiracy he keeps shouting about actually exists.

It's difficult to argue that the humble rabbi from the Galilee didn't exist, but it's incredibly easy to argue that there is no evidence that he was a son of any god, actually performed miracles, or that much of his legend isn't based upon prior myths of dying and rising hero / gods.

There is ample evidence for the existence of God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that God exists, but proof for me may not be proof for you, some people can see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both for and against the existence of God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...

Without any evidence for, or even so much as a rational argument in support of your god, or any other god for that matter, believing they exist is patently moronic.

This notion ignores overwhelming evidence that etiquette exists in primitive societies as much as — and often in more rigid forms than — in industrialized societies.

The truth about these lights is that they probably do exist - there's too much evidence, too many sightings over too many years.

But with the resurrection of Jesus, while we have witnesses and the documents they wrote, it is not so much what they say that convinces us of the historical fact of the resurrection, but the simple fact that such witnesses and documents actually exist which provides the greatest evidence for the resurrection.

Many highly educated men of science believe there is much «evidence» that God exists.

In fact, much evidence for other species have been found, and it is extraordinarily difficult to find because you can't just look up in the sky at something that still exists in order to find proof, you have to go carefully digging all over the world for stuff that has for the most part been buried, destroyed, decayed, etc..

Obviously this process of descent has not been observed, but there exists so much overwhelming evidence supporting it that most scientists (and probably all scientists in the life sciences) consider it a fact as well.

There is much evidence to suspect that such a man DID in fact exist.

Some evidence for this exists in the extremely low birth rate among more secularized Jews, their high intermarriage rate, and the fact that they are much more likely to convert to other religions than are religious Jews.

I corrected you both times, that I never made a claim about the existence of minds or evidence (though isn't it blatantly obvious to you, me, and pretty much everyone, that they do exist?).

At least Jesus is thought to have existed without any evidence whatsoever other than literature that has so much excluded and content that has been lost in translation that it's almost impossible to be a genuine Christian because no matter what you are ignorant to so many other facts... assuming everything is true.

If we believe in «God,» we might as well believe in magical unicorns, leprechauns and vampires, because there is just as much evidence that they exist as there is for the existence of God.

There's no evidence that Noah or Moses even existed, much less finding an «ark» or a «Red Sea crossing».

It is much more probable, given the overwhelming amount of evidence that exists today, that Jesus never even existed.

There's as much evidence for god as there is for Santa Clause or the Easter Bunny, yet we assume that they do not exist.

Just as much «evidence» exists about the Egyptioan gods, Buddha, and hundreds of other religions.

And until religion can answer where god came from (with hard evidence), I won't give much credence to the claim that god exists.

«Much of our conclusion was based on the fact that evidence of harm does not necessarily exist.

Tim White, a paleoanthropologist not connected to the project, says the findings were published too early, with too much left unknown — including the age of the fossils and whether concrete evidence for the intentional placement of the dead exists.

Professor Tsakiris, from the Department of Psychology at Royal Holloway, explained, «There is much existing evidence to show that people are more likely to misidentify harmless objects as weapons when held by Black people.

He is quick to point out that much of the existing research around vitamin D was poorly executed and consists of poor quality evidence.

While there is not much robust and methodologically sound research on magnesium's antispasmodic properties, there exists evidence that supplementation relieves cramps in some patient populations, like pregnant women (of course, if you're pregnant and considering a change in your supplement regimen, talk to your doctor first).

While you might feel much more assured and more protected by using a zero - to - low EMF sauna in your home, no evidence exists to warrant the shunning of other forms of infrared saunas.

Well, perhaps the tree is just like them, immortal and unable to fall to harm, but no evidence of this exists, and in fact, the Tucks were able to «damage» the tree by carving a large «T» into its trunk without much effort.

Our work would generate much - needed empirical evidence about the relative effectiveness of instructional materials that both complements and goes beyond existing «experts» review» - based textbook examinations.

Little systematic evidence exists on this question for the charter sector in general, much less for KIPP schools in particular.

«We teach staff and students to question whatever they are told,» writes Miriam Mason - Sesay (@EducAidSL) in Sierra Leone, «asking themselves what the evidence is, looking for corroboration or contrasting or apparently contradictory information and to seek for reasons for different perspectives, to realize that biases exist in so much that is presented as fact.»

Here I'll summarize the paper and what I believe is wrong with it, and conclude by calling on all parties in this debate to discuss the existing evidence in much more cautious tones.

While there exists some quasi-experimental literature on the effects for student achievement of being new to the profession (e.g., Rockoff, 2004) or to a school (Hanushek & Rivkin, 2010), to date there is little evidence about how much within - school churn typically happens and how it affects students.

It is much easier to focus attention away from these real issues by making Education responsible for everything and suggesting educational inequality exists because teachers and schools don't know what they're doing for lack of «evidence».

The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), a major rewrite of the much - maligned No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), is the first federal education law to define the term «evidence - based» and to distinguish between activities with «strong,» «moderate,» and «promising» support based on the strength of existing research.

Although we have much to learn about education leadership and how it contributes to student learning, there is considerable existing evidence on which to build.

Good scientific evidence that shows a much more complicated relationship exists between dogs and their environment then a linear hierarchy.

And just as some masterpieces (think of Shakespeare's plays «really» written by Bacon) are dogged by fancies that they were done by someone else, so it has turned out to be with Goya and the Black Paintings: a Spanish furniture historian, Juan José Junquera, recently created a brief flurry of headlines in Europe and America by claiming - on no pictorial evidence at all - that the Black Paintings were «really» done by Goya's son Javier, a ne'er - do - much who may have been a painter - certainly his father called him that, if only in support of his application for a pension - but by whom no attributable paintings exist.

Finally, on the policy side, if there's evidence that existing technology is inadequate to affordably decarbonize a growing global energy system on a scale that would matter to the climate, and it's clear that we've utterly disinvested in energy research for decades, it's my job to write that, as I did in 2006, and repeat it on the blog as much as necessary.

... and that even in the case of major paradigms for which there existed a great deal of evidence but which were later replaced, much of what was at one time thought to be true has in fact been preserved in the form of a correspondence principle between the older theory and its newer replacement — that the greatest difference between the two lies simply in the languages in which the theories are expressed (ibid.).

The evidence that global warming is occurring, and furthermore is due in large part to human influences (though perhaps other factors also play a role), is much stronger than the evidence I have personally seen that Inhofe exists.

If someone is advocating dismantling existing power plants because they emit to much CO2, but can not produce any reliable evidence that the CO2 is harmful....

This has never been demonstrated, there is no evidence at all that it exists, and all the available evidence says the basic heating effect of CO2 is 1.1 C per doubling is all there is and that much warming only happens in very dry environments with increasingly less surface warming where water is available to evaporate.

We will see that over the last several years, while correlations between CO2 and temperature exist in the data, much of the historical circumstantial evidence for AGW theory has gotten weaker, and we will cover «global dimming» and see if this effect makes the case for AGW stronger.

We just question the certainty of how much warming has occurred, whether CO2 is the «thermostat» which overides natural variation in temperature and don't see enough evidence that the Earth is somehow «out of whack» and on the verge of some «tipping point» if such a thing exists at all.

A single season of bad storms «doesn't add much to the already existing evidence» that global warming will lead to more extreme weather, he said, but it highlights that coastal cities need to be ready.

Grasslands are unable to sustain herds much larger than the existing ones, as evidenced by the vast dust bowl forming in northern China, largely from overgrazing by sheep and goats.

It is an unfortunate feature that reviewers invent scenarios that don't exist so that the can carry on with the pretence that how much sat energy the Atlantic absorbs is not related to the cloud mass above it, irrespective of how clear the evidence is.