Not exact matches
And there is no
evidence that the
lower rate would spark enough economic growth to pay for itself, nor that it would spark
much growth at all.
This is why scientists can not «prove» the evolutionary development of the eye (and we know that the real chance of finding fossil
evidence is
much lower than 50 %).
Some
evidence for this exists in the extremely
low birth rate among more secularized Jews, their high intermarriage rate, and the fact that they are
much more likely to convert to other religions than are religious Jews.
* If * morbidity is
lower in the homebirth group because more of those ill women died, and were thus removed from the sample, the apparent rate of «severe adverse maternal» outcomes has been artificially deflated in the homebirth group — by an unknown amount — and therefore is
evidence of pretty
much nothing.
Adding to the problem, if your child drinks too
much cow's milk, she'll feel full and potentially eat fewer iron - rich foods, which could explain why «
evidence has shown that throughout a person's lifespan, 1 - to 3 - year - olds have the
lowest daily iron intake,» Burgert says.
What bothers me so
much about the homebirth debate is that we have ample scientific
evidence to show that homebirth is safe for
low risk women.
Ancient soils like these provide
evidence for
low atmospheric oxygen levels through
much of Earth's history.
They found that although the variegated sea urchin, L. variegatus, has a
much lower life expectancy in the wild than the other two species they studied, it displayed no
evidence of a decline in regenerative capacity with age, which suggests that senescence may not be tied to a short life expectancy in the wild.
I think the
evidence is pretty clear that for instance, local, labor — intensive,
low - input agriculture is the smartest option from
much of the world, both in terms of providing jobs, security, stability and food, and in making those ecological systems robust enough to withstand the damage that's coming, that's already here.
P - values are a notoriously difficult concept to grasp and are often misinterpreted, but the original paper's message was clear: A P - value, or α, below 0.05 is
much weaker
evidence that the results aren't wrong than people think;
lowering it makes studies stronger.
«Although almost all the prior studies we reviewed were for privately insured patients from a time when cost - sharing levels were
much lower than they are today, these studies still commonly found
evidence that high out - of - pockets costs were associated with reductions in utilization of these drugs,» said Doshi.
Wray says the new
evidence for water is an encouraging development in the search for life, but he points out that there is
much we still don't know — «how deep the water goes, how
low the temperature gets and how high the salt concentration gets.
Skeptics say there's not
much evidence that pesticides hurt our bodies when we ingest the
low amounts found in our food.
«The
evidence is
much more in favor of the fact that omega - 6
lowers your risk of heart disease.
I do believe that
low fat is the way to go, but there is too
much evidence that nuts and seeds in moderation are good for you.
All in all, I think it was a good discussion but if it is to continue either the very
low carb advocates will need to come up with better arguments and better
evidence, or the topic will have to shift to exploring the merits of high - carb diets — a topic which the ancestral community hasn't spent
much time discussing.
Ten years ago, there was not
much scientific
evidence behind the
low - carbohydrate diet, however since 2003, there have been over 27 randomized, controlled, scientific human trials.
While you might feel
much more assured and more protected by using a zero - to -
low EMF sauna in your home, no
evidence exists to warrant the shunning of other forms of infrared saunas.
The fact that
low levels of magnesium are associated with all the risk factors and symptoms of heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, high cholesterol, heart arrhythmia, angina and heart attack can no longer be ignored; the
evidence is
much too compelling.»
There is
much evidence of significantly
lower rates of chronic disease amongst vegans and vegetarians.
I have shown you
much evidence that cancer is cured with a high fat, zero carb,
lowered calorie diet.
not really every single game on the chart has had a
much lower second week sales, but just ignore the
evidence in front of your face... it is so
much better that way..
There is no justification for punting on curricula: There is too
much evidence that quality matters, and the cost of choosing quality is too
low to do otherwise.
There is no
evidence that it is contributing anything to improved student performance,
much less the improved performance of the very
low - income and minority students for which it was in the first instance created.
Allington and McGill - Franzen have assembled an impressive array of
evidence to document the importance of providing students with access to books, particularly in those critical summer months when
low income students lose so
much ground to their wealthier peers.
Despite the
evidence that salaries influence teacher recruitment and retention, a teacher's salary in
much of the United States is too
low to support a middle - class existence.
That may sound like it's setting the bar
low, but the
evidence is overwhelming that the majority of investors do
much worse, whether they use actively managed mutual funds or pick individual securities.
Nevertheless, there is no
much evidence as to which stocks do better, those that have
low forward P / E or
low trailing P / E.
It seems logical that it might help the kidneys to feed
lower amounts of higher quality protein throughout life but there really isn't
much evidence to support a beneficial effect except in dogs who actually have kidney insufficiency.
Although elevated dN / dS is a common metric for
evidence of selection when comparing single genes, dN / dS values are
much lower for signatures of selection across the entire mitogenome [33].
Empirical
evidence suggests that there is a
much larger external climate forcing than the Milankovitch cycles and this in turn implies that climate sensitivity must be
much lower than currently believed.
It's not so
much that «Sociology causes skepticism», it's just that standards of
evidence tend, due to the nature of the subject, to be a bit
lower than in the harder sciences.
There is also considerable observational
evidence that arctic sea ice extent over the last few decades is
much lower than it has been for at least a century prior to modern times.
Recent
evidence of faster rates of global sea - level rise suggests that these projections may be too
low.3, 4,5 Given recent accelerated shrinking of glaciers and ice sheets, scientists now think that a rise of 2.6 feet (80 centimeters) is plausible — and that as
much as 6.6 feet (2 meters) is possible though less likely.16
What emprical
evidence is there indicating how
much more rise we should expect before we reach stability then slow
lowering as we progress to the next Glacial Maximum.
So is the
evidence for
low sensitivity,
much of it discussed here.
On balance I suspect the risk and temptation will be
much higher for SRM, with its apparently
low costs, than for CDR, but there is as yet no convincing
evidence that policy makers would not choose to avoid tough choices today if they could promise to deploy more CDR in the future.
That would provide strong
evidence climate sensitivity is
much lower, but it won't be proof.
In essence, there's a lot here for organic supporters to cherry - pick as
evidence of organic's yield potential (but not cherries, which yielded
much lower).
For instance, ground source heat pumps tend to have higher efficiencies than air source units during the heating season due to the relative stability of ground temperatures below certain depths, though air source units — which involve
much lower capital costs — have closed the gap in recent years as manufacturers have refined their design, and there is
evidence to indicate that space heating demand in many Irish buildings may be peaking in Ireland's frequently relatively mild but windy weather, as the guide to air source heat pumps in Issue 24 of Passive House Plus discussed.
«High agreement from medium
evidence» is pretty
much «global warming» in a nutshell — except that it is mostly high agreement from
low evidence, by IPCC's own admission.
«All of this [opposition] testimony is flawed to the extent it simply relies on... predictions by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -LSB-...] today the best
evidence indicates that... a
much lower climate sensitivity value of 1 °C or 1.5 °C is correct -LSB-...]»
• Poles to tropics temperature gradient, average temp of tropics over past 540 Ma; and arguably warming may be net - beneficial overall • Quotes from IPCC AR4 WG1 showing that warming would be beneficial for life, not damaging • Quotes from IPCC AR5 WG3 stating (in effect) that the damage functions used for estimating damages are not supported by
evidence • Richard Tol's breakdown of economic impacts of GW by sector • Economic damages of climate change — about the IAMs • McKitrick — Social Cost of Carbon
much lower than commonly stated • Bias on impacts of GHG emissions — Figure 1 is a chart showing 15 recent estimates of SCC — Lewis and Curry, 2015, has the
lowest uncertainty range.
BEST is
much better on such a short timeframe, and even though it's only land temperatures, BEST both shows no
evidence of having a significantly different trend since 1998 from the trend for the previous half century and also is generally consistent with rising (but slightly
lower, though with significantly greater uncertainty) sea surface temperatures.
The
lower the stabilization level, the earlier these deep reductions have to be realized (high agreement,
much evidence).
There is
much evidence that with increasing temperatures species move farther north or higher in elevation while maintaining their original
lower elevation limits.
Though the book covers
much of the same ground, albeit at a
lower reading level, as Al Gore's famous global warming presentation, it is never alarmist, and instead focuses on the grounded
evidence for global climate change and the collective efforts of many different kinds of scientists.
The
evidence presented in this report suggests that the
low - carbon growth path can lead to as
much prosperity as the high - carbon one, especially when account is taken of its multiple other benefits: from greater energy security, to cleaner air and improved health.
There's a body of
evidence that the sensitivity may well be
much lower than the IPCC range.
More specific
evidence - based measurements of heat - related deaths suggest a
much lower mortality impact from heat (several hundreds annually).