Sentences with phrase «much evidence then»

Not exact matches

Since then, additional high - profile studies have come out — including an article, published in the journal of Psychological Science in the Public Interest, which found no evidence that brain games improve everyday cognition — but the topic is still very much up for debate.

«China has poor intelligence on their movements and has been unable to produce much evidence» that they are indeed involved in militancy, said another diplomatic source, who is familiar with Chinese efforts to prevent the Uighurs from leaving and then trying and get them deported back to China.

If there is no a priori ground for denying that, in addition to being influenced by the brain and by intervening experiences, there is also an element of direct recall of past experience, then a much simpler theory, more in accord with introspective evidence, is possible.

I would much rather have a person who believes in things that have evidence writing and / or voting on my fiscal policies then someone who believes in something due to faith and has no evidence.

And then, when the first counter-attacker speaks, we culturally tell him to be silent, forebear, and show graciousness and mercy... our, we demand a much higher level of evidence from him / her (to overturn the first assertion).

A part of the problem listing evidence is that there is so much that a few are stated and then believers try to pick away at those in isolation.

When you consider there is as much evidence for Zeus, the christian god, the unicorn in my closet, the easter bunny and a thousand other gods that have traversed history then it becomes intellectually honest to dismiss all.

Then again, actual evidence would be to much to ask from you, as it always has been.

to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.

Despite the importance of economic conditions in 1992, then, religious and cultural alignments were very much in evidence in voting patterns.

so much so that they seek out something without any merit nor even a shredd of evidence and then claim it to be more then truth but the word of god who for all intents and purposes is equal to every other make believe creature in the entire history of man - kind!

After its been done a lot more and by different people if the results hold up it would be a much better source of evidence if they don't well then the guiy was wrong.

I am accused of being a heretic, an impostor and a traitor, which leaves me overwhelmed with astonishment and horror...» Luther then described the preaching and Indulgence traffic in Saxony and said it stirred opposition, «malicious talk was much in evidence around their booths», and only the threat of the stake prevented people speaking openly.

In fact, there is much evidence to back up the idea that it has caused far more problems then offered solutions over history.

When AFC was winning the EPL then Wenger didn't have as much power, IMO this is evidence that a DoF / SD role on the board is needed FAST and someone who understands football more than the admin side.

Its only natural that if you spend 4 months staring at a bunch of people from Missisippi then your going to think the first person you see from Alabama is the bell of the ball so I cant fault Condoleeza Rice for trusting the evidence she was given a little too much - a lone blemish on a otherwise pristine record of determining which organizatons pose the biggest risk to others.

I found that much of this was in evidence on social media in the immediate aftermath of the game, and has even continued in the couple of days that have elapsed since then.

In fact, some evidence suggests that focusing on weight loss can actually be harmful to an overweight person's health by tying too much concern to how much weight they lose or keep off — and then making them relapse when the scale doesn't budge despite their best efforts.

Things haven't changed much since then, by the evidence.

Geologic evidence, such as ancient beaches from the Pliocene, suggest that global sea levels then were as much as 25 meters higher than today.

Many fossils have been discovered, which is strong evidence of an earlier time when the Earth's continents were much different from today, many of them connecting and then disconnecting over eons.

SEI 2106 shows oodles of data that almost everyone will conclude is very solid evidence denying my prediction (i.e., since academic science in the US is doing such a productive job and provides so much of value to the public, then all must be excellent!).

My standards for evidence are much higher now then they were in 2011 (when the comment was made).

Drinking a protein shake after resistance - training is a popular nutritional strategy adopted by many fitness enthusiasts and athletes to boost muscle protein synthesis (MPS), but does evidence support this practice, and if so, then what type of protein is best, how much should be ingested and when should it be

It had merit then and has even more today, if only because the passing decades have brought so much more evidence that the original versions of these programs don't do much for kids.

It makes so much sense that the expected learning outcomes should first be established in the form of the evaluation, and then be evidenced as the instructional plan is designed around them.

But our best evidence shows that if the main goal is the reduction of the achievement gap then our effort must start much earlier and be much more intense.

A more regional focus is explored through the loss of glaciers in The Glacier National Park and then then students investigate the evidence for a much greener North African region and what the consequence of this is for the future.

I don't yet see evidence that print publications are much interested in serials; if they are, it makes total sense they would tap a well - known storyteller like Smith — since then the cachet of his name helps with marketing and promotion of their product.

Good scientific evidence that shows a much more complicated relationship exists between dogs and their environment then a linear hierarchy.

Well, if this isn't evidence that the next console is around the corner, then pretty much nothing is!

Manga, which had its roots back then, is not much in evidence (thankfully), but everything else sure is.

If their was evidence that wolves had grown in numbers so much that they were having an impact on people's livelihoods, then I could see why people might be upset.

If you have any evidence that this hypothesis is false then I would very much like to learn of it.

«Lomborg loves to play the nit - picky «I'm the honest statistician» role and then use this stance to imply that doing much of anything except R&D is a waste, ignoring the huge body of evidence that pricing GHG emissions can have large net benefits.

The truth is that our influence is as nothing compared to natural forces and if Realclimate and others wish to be believed and trusted then they have much work to do and should not expect to be able to spread panic and dismay worldwide on the basis of the inadequate evidence currently available.

Since then, scientists have failed to find much physical evidence to support the report's assumptions, but that failure has not stemmed from any lack of taxpayer support of research that looks for such evidence.

What emprical evidence is there indicating how much more rise we should expect before we reach stability then slow lowering as we progress to the next Glacial Maximum.

We see in you no evidence of foundation for your assertion of how much reduction in CO2 emission may be possible, and if you can construct a valid model for how climate factors determine CO2 levels then you've gone farther than all of science — an astounding feat worthy of a comic book supervillain indeed.

If you wait for another 6 tosses and reality again ends up with only 1H versus the typical 3H from the ensemble, then you have much stronger evidence for a discrepancy... but until that happens there simply isn't much to go on.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

There are dozens of supporting evidence that the Earth's atmosphere is much warmer then it has been in the last hundred years or so.

If the evidence suggested that Earth was much the same in those days then we wouldn't have much cause for concern, but rather it shows that it was a very different place.

The interesting thing is that if this theory is correct, which will require much more evidence to confirm, then our periods of warming and cooling would seem to correspond to the possible major changes in orbits among the planets.

Jones and Mann provide several examples of historic documentary evidence that they believe has too much emphasis placed on them, including vineyards in medieval England - pointing out there are far more today than there were then - and commenting on the frequency of Frost fairs.

Teaching good science and scientific process to children is imperative (even if they don't then go into science) as the skills are invaluable in everyday life (evidenced by the fact that anyone with a mathematical, scientific or engineering degree can pretty much work in any field they want).

You may not choose to bring a claim, but if you haven't gathered evidence, then you may make any claim much harder to bring.

When we point out that the burden really lies upon those who would toss aside centuries of history on short - term, flimsy evidence, who ignore the actual evidence of heavy consolidations with more to follow, who would saddle us with a change that would be irreversible regardless of how much harm it later engendered, who would risk so much of what the legal profession has stood for, who refuse to work anywhere near as hard on real solutions to real problems as they do on this pig - in - a-poke, then we are met with silence or insults.

Family Law Arbitration is a process where a third - party neutral expert receives the facts, the evidence, and the legal argument in advance, as much or as little as you agree to submit; has a unique understanding of the law; and then conducts an oral hearing to let the parties and / or their counsel make oral submissions, and cross-examine witnesses, if they wish.

I think you would want to have that encouraged and be adapted and then judges or masters of the courtroom would see this evidence come in with a much better degree of reliability because of this authenticity component.