Not exact matches
And in truth, there's no
exact science to figuring out how
much you should -LSB-...]
This is also indicated by the aim of IM as enunciated in chapter one: «The object of the following chapters is not so
much to teach mathematics, but to enable the students from the very beginning of their course to know what the
science is about, and why it is necessarily the foundation of
exact thought as applied to natural phenomena» (IM 2).
No it is not an
exact science and you can spend a lot today and not achieve
much tomorrow.
While there's no
exact science when it comes to how
much a newborn should eat, there is a simple mathematical equation to get a rough estimate of how many ounces your baby needs each day.
The
exact mechanism for this is unknown, but
science has already proven that too
much sitting is associated with an increased risk of colon, breast and prostate cancer.
Most spend way too
much time doing cardio, so it's easier for me to tell them to stop altogether rather than talking about the
exact science behind frequency and duration.
Much like calorie counting, it's not necessarily an
exact science, but something that becomes increasingly important if we go to extremes of macronutrient composition (i.e. less than 10 % of calories from fat or carbohydrate).
Without going into too
much detail, (and this is not an
exact science) basically, if you don't keep more than 3 items in a fix, the computer thinks that the stylist wasn't a good fit... essentially.
you will not get a health bar to see how
much health the monster has, you need to watch it's movements to see when it's near death or ready for trapping, it's not an
exact science but that makes it really exciting.
Exiting is not an
exact science, and there are times when deviating from your initial exit plan makes sense, but you should always decide before you enter a trade what your ideal exit strategy is and then try to stick to that plan as
much as possible.
Through
much experience I believe rabbit health care is more of an art form than an
exact science.
Even in mathematics, which is
much more
exact than the other
sciences, since it builds on immutable axioms and the rules of logic, there are numerous conjectures that are believed to be true, but for which a stringent and in itself conclusive mathematical proof is missing.
Of course, despite ongoing advances in computer modelling technology and the millions of dollars being channelled into the problem in the UK and US, among other nations, climate change predictions are far from an
exact science, and few, if any, researchers engaged in the issue have claimed as
much.
Ah that's right... agriculture is too
much of an
exact science to include it in the whole «debate» here.
And when we do talk about the
science we discover that the
exact amount of our «emissions of CO2 have contributed to the current warming period» is very
much unsettled.
@topal - its really clear that think tanks like Heartland are using the
exact same tactics by denying the established
science, and even manufactures their own «research» (NIPCC)
much like the «doctors smoke this brand» advertising from back then.
Obviously this is a different issue — it doesn't belong strictly speaking to the field of climate
science, and I don't how
much we are allowed to elaborate on this here (the
exact border of what is on and off topics on RC is still slightly unclear for me).
Deciding how
much life insurance you need to purchase isn't an
exact science, but here are some things to consider as you calculate your needs.
Assessing your eligibility and calculating how
much money you could receive for a Life Insurance Settlement is not an
exact science.
I had nearly despaired... You addressed the
exact issues I had (including the spazzing: — RRB --RRB- and have given me new hope to tackle the challenge and see writing the resume as the «door to a brighter future», not as «rocket
science» Thank you so
much!