Sentences with phrase «much explanation as»

Provide the employer with as much explanation as possible about your qualifications, to help them understand how they compare to UK qualifications and whether they meet their minimum entry requirements.

Other than stating that it intends to «focus on PS4 titles» Sony hasn't given much explanation as to why it's dropping these older platform titles.

Personally as an intermediate level player I didn't find it too helpful though because it's mostly limited to teaching you either very basic controls or ridiculously complicated dekes that make you feel like you're playing a fighting game, without much explanation as to when is best to use these maneuvers, only demanding that you execute them a certain number of times to advance.

This skirt doesn't need much explanation as to why it's so AMAZING but it really is a great skirt to have and can be styled SO many ways!!

And then, miraculously and without much explanation as to how it happened, they had a deal — thanks to a breakthrough on raise the age, which had reportedly been the culprit for holding up everything else.

This isn't so much an explanation as a man backing himself into a corner and giving up.

Not exact matches

An explanation for this may be that people value consistency and predictability in fair treatment as much or more than fair treatment itself, according to Brent Scott, co-author of the paper.

The only other explanation, Guatieri says, is rampant speculation and foreign wealth — with the latter emanating mainly from China, where residents are estimated to have moved as much as $ 1 trillion out of the country last year.

As I wrote last week, one possible explanation for why Boehner and the rest of the Republican establishment have given the Tea Party so much free rein is that they fear primary challengers to the right.

The explanation of how to become obsessed is basic: force yourself, learn as much as you can, don't make excuses.

If it's all just alternate explanations that work with the evidence, I would much prefer people change their theory to meet the facts (as the Dalai Lama, for instance, recommends) than keep going with some simplistic idea of «faith».

and Dr. James White is a member of your cult so I trust his magical fairy tale explanations about as much as I trust Joseph Smith or L. Ron Hubbard or crazy Ken Ham!

The analysis of these texts will be much shorter than the analysis of the flood in Genesis 6 — 8 because explaining all the texts in detail would simply mean that many of the same arguments and ideas presented as an explanation for one text would simply be repeated in an explanation for a different text.

If we adopt a strict systematic stance, these texts have as much right to be taken into account in our explanation as any other texts we might use.

While we may believe in the Holy Spirit as a manifestation of God's presence in the world, we sometimes wonder if the church's early theologians invented this connection as an explanation of the continuity between Jesus and themselves, and if this invention didn't in turn and inadvertently lead to orthodox formulations about the Trinity that belied the Spirit's reality, much as the Kinsey Report misleads readers about the real joy and meaning of sex.

If the requisite disjunctive synthesis can not be explained by appeal to the doctrine that God values all possible worlds, this is not so much because evaluation is logically dependent upon gradations of importance, but because (accepting Christian's explanation of the absence of such gradations in the primordial nature) the logic of the doctrine itself entails that God be inextricably involved in the formation of actual worlds as «circles of convergence,» i.e., in «the orderings effected by individuals in the course of nature.»

But the real explanation of our ineffectual preaching lies much deeper: far too many of us, far too much of the time, do not recognize the terrible truth that as preachers we are engaged in nothing other than the task of confronting our listeners with the very Word of God.

Jeshua, if that were the case then religious authorities wouldn't spend so much time trying to control information, trying to pass off their beliefs as scientific, or attempting to misinform the public on genuine scientific explanations that happen to contradict those beliefs.

If then such a zealous learner, though not carrying things so far as to become a disciple, were to discourse loudly and volubly of how much he owed the Teacher, so that his eulogy was almost endless and its gilding priceless; if he were to resent our explanation that the Teacher had been merely an occasion, neither his eulogy nor his resentment could further our inquiry, since both had the same ground, namely, that though lacking in the courage to understand he had nevertheless not lacked the audacity to go beyond.

But to return to Whitehead's explicit position, we should observe that he believed that the great virtue of Christianity has been that it is not so much a metaphysic seeking some historical grounding as it is an historical fact and focus (found in Jesus) seeking for metaphysical explanation.

There are numerous other explanations for this verse which make much better sense of the verse itself and the context as a whole.

There is no tested evidence of these natural explanations, much less proof, but the existence of multiple natural possibilities negates the Big Bang and Inflation as proof of God (that doesn't mean it proves No God, it means that it can't prove God did it since there are other alternatives).

Leclerc in effect grants as much in his subsequent explanation (WTCS 225f.

If you can't understand my explanation above and see that as an attempt at discrediting, without pointing out where exactly it's wrong, then there isn't much more I can do, other than hope one day you'll learn something.

Please provide your explanation as to why the disciples truly believed that Jesus had risen from the dead, so much so that some were killed for their faith.

Much modern intellectual debate, particularly within the popular arena, centers on disputes between religion and science over such seminal issues as creationism versus evolutionary theory, or theological explanations of the origin of the universe versus the «big - bang theory» of the new cosmology.

For instance, Job is not interested in the problem of suffering as such but in answering the mystery of his experience; he does not ask so much for an explanation of evil as for an opportunity to take his case directly to God (Job 12:122, 23:1 - 17, 30:19 - 23).

Indeed, one of the failures in much contemporary explanation of human life — as, for example, by some of our modern secular sociologists — is precisely at this point.

John Cahill on an enthusiastic and thorough explanation of Confession; Robert Wilde finds God in the desert of the heart, mind and world; Suzanne Stevenson on Christ in Gethsemane as a source of consolation for those suffering from depression; James Prior on two attempts to reconcile creation and evolution which fail to convince and Christopher Jackson finds much to recommend in a guidebook for Catholics at or going to university.

Indeed, the major function of religion, in the experience of its great exemplars, has been not so much the explanation of life, as life's conquest — the winning of spiritual triumph in the midst of mysterious adversity.

However, this effort to save Hartshorne's position seems in vain to Neville, for it terminates the explanation of the existence of reality in a transcendent individual who consists of or at least causes the illustration of the categories; for Neville, such an individual needs an explanation as much as any other instance of order, and the fact that no explanation can be found on Hartshorne's grounds simply shows again the futility of «rationalism» on this issue.

Hidden inside this article is a perfectly good explanation for why the Ten Commandments, as much as many of us revere them, should not be enshrined as a government - approved position.

What in an older kind of philosophy would have been called the chain - of - cause - and - effect is here seen as being very much richer; it is a congeries of occasions, events, pressures, movements, routes, which come to focus at this or that point, and which for their explanation require some principle that has brought and still is bringing each of them, rather than some other possible occurrence, into this particular concrete moment of what we commonly style «existence».

Einkorn is an ancient grain and is actually lower in gluten than modern wheat and is much much better (read a great explanation here as to why einkorn is better).

So yeah... I fell like this granola requires no further explanation — here is the recipe, but please use it wisely because if you make too much you may find yourself in a similar situation as I, where I consumed a little to much of it for my own good.....

This is a long - winded way to explain a few minor changes, but I felt like you all deserved a bit of an explanation as to why you've been seeing so much of the v - e-g-a-n word lately.

It makes about as much we we as any other explanation.

I'm sure there is a possible, if implausible explanation for each of those inconsistencies... but as you start to stack implausibilities, the likelihood increases that it's a much simpler explanation, i.e. either a huge exaggeration or outright fabrication.

The refs» subsequent explanation rang hollow and there's no getting around the implication that they botched this as much as anything can get botched.

Oh forget it, when someone is a fanatic and sees any logical explanation as dim witted or idiotic there is not much to say.

Hafiz, sometimes i just think youre actually admin and trying to provoke positive responses or negative ones towards you but positive for Arsenal as you never give much explanation or reveal why it is you think the way you do also never really putting your thoughts a certain way so to get gooners coming round to your way of thinking.

As for Michail Antonio, a player I like enormously, although he hasn't really done anything much this season yet, I haven't yet heard his explanation for what went through his head.

Much the same point is made by the authors of the new BJSM editorial and in Back in the Game, where Kutcher and Gerstner argue that suicide rates among former National Football League players, can be and have been affected by messaging in the media — a phenomenon called the «suicide contagion» — and note how, in its coverage of the suicide of players such as Junior Seau and Dave Duerson, the media has consistently ignored all seven of the recommendations of the Centers of Disease Control on how to avoid spreading that contagion, including not presenting simplistic explanations for suicide, not engaging in repetitive, ongoing, or excessive reporting of suicide, and not sensationalizing suicide.

iMO, viewing a labor and birth, no matter how much explanation has been given, MUST be traumatic to pre-adolescent children — and to be honest, to most adolescents as well, even when the outcome is entirely uncomplicated.

They want and deserve explanations as much as adults do.

Also, because these parents provide rules as well as explanations for these rules, children are much more likely to internalize these lessons.

As someone who covered Christie for almost ten years, the latter explanation makes much more sense, knowing his personality.

One Republican described the Saturday explanation as making the governor «look weak,» since you never want to be in a position of justifying what you've done — especially not on a beautiful Saturday afternoon in July when barely anyone is paying much attention.

By these reports, Vineyard 48 isn't so much a winery where people taste samples and hear explanations of the word «terroir» as it is a full - blown, fall to the floor saloon.

Although European elections are generally seen as second - order elections across all member states, the turn - out of 20.84 % in Croatia was especially low, but the often - heard explanation that parties did not invest much time or money in getting the vote out for a one - year term simply does not hold water.