Sentences with phrase «much explanation of»

For what it's worth, all of the options don't provide much explanation of their function beyond a short blurb.

Well 1 and a half hours in and storywise this game just dumps you into it with not much explanation of what the heck is going on.

I rather assumed that since all the pension administrators were providing so much information about the # 1 million allowance, with no information about any other allowance, and also providing so much explanation of how the LTA worked, that they thought they knew what they were talking about... and I didn't realise there was going to be, or expected to be, an LTA change in the budget in March...

Not so much explanation of the individual poses will be given, not to distract you from practice, as we are assuming you know your basic alignments and fundamentals of asana from the foundation training.

Teachers often feel that the expertise they have gained from their experience is ignored and that they instead get a new, supposedly evidence - based curriculum every few years without much explanation of why the new one is so much better than the old.

Indeed, the major function of religion, in the experience of its great exemplars, has been not so much the explanation of life, as life's conquest — the winning of spiritual triumph in the midst of mysterious adversity.

Not exact matches

While many of the world's most colorful towns and cities have historic reasons for their varied hues, Júzcar has a much more modern explanation — Hollywood.

He has a simple explanation for the positive impact of buddying up at work: «If you wake up knowing you're driving to a place where you enjoy the company of the people you work with, your satisfaction is going to be much higher.»

While the team reportedly accepted Love's explanation, Wojnarowski said much of the locker room remained divided.

For much more on the biological explanations of how various foods affect your body and more detailed advice on how to eat right for consistent energy, check out Klatell's complete post.

An explanation for this may be that people value consistency and predictability in fair treatment as much or more than fair treatment itself, according to Brent Scott, co-author of the paper.

If there is a reasonable explanation there shouldn't be too much of a problem.

Seems everyone has an opinion about what it is that makes Silicon Valley generate so much value and so many crazy start - ups, but I think a lot of those easy explanations are full of hubris and miss the real magic of what is happening here.

Here is my rough interpretation of her much more eloquent explanation.

The only other explanation, Guatieri says, is rampant speculation and foreign wealth — with the latter emanating mainly from China, where residents are estimated to have moved as much as $ 1 trillion out of the country last year.

As I wrote last week, one possible explanation for why Boehner and the rest of the Republican establishment have given the Tea Party so much free rein is that they fear primary challengers to the right.

There are many explanations for the acceleration, but the most important seems to be that no one expected many different inducements, incentives, and trade - offs to converge on each of us so quickly, specifically, simultaneously and, frankly, pretty much inescapably.

Sanandaji thinks that a much better explanation for the economic success of Scandinavia is culture.

much less any presidential candidate's qualifications, with a couple of numbers devoid of explanation or context.

The explanation of how to become obsessed is basic: force yourself, learn as much as you can, don't make excuses.

In his monthly commentary, Gross engages in an extended explanation of the rise of the concept of credit in the modern world, before asking, «Yet how much credit is too much credit and how is a dedicated central banker to know?

I hope that we will see a much more lengthy explanation of the decision to use a multiple - credit approach to provide short - term funding to CCS.

Good explanation of some differences between growth and dividend stocks, much better than a lot of other stuff I've read that just looks at charts and not the reasons behind them.

In fact, the divergences in global economic performance — one of those being that U.S. monetary policy would tighten while European monetary policy would loosen — actually look very much like an explanation for what already happened last year.

If it's all just alternate explanations that work with the evidence, I would much prefer people change their theory to meet the facts (as the Dalai Lama, for instance, recommends) than keep going with some simplistic idea of «faith».

There is so much information for evolution that you have to purposely avoid any actual explanation of it and the evidence behind it to make any claim like you've done.

But it isn't an explanation that is going to get much attention until it has been definitely ruled out that it's simply the result of systematic errors.

My theory, of course, goes much further than your «God's silence is a mystery» explanation.

to Shai... your explanation fails to explain why much of the misery is focused on the most religious of people.

The homily gives a much fuller explanation of his thinking than the letter, and readers interested in the matter should read it.

and Dr. James White is a member of your cult so I trust his magical fairy tale explanations about as much as I trust Joseph Smith or L. Ron Hubbard or crazy Ken Ham!

The analysis of these texts will be much shorter than the analysis of the flood in Genesis 6 — 8 because explaining all the texts in detail would simply mean that many of the same arguments and ideas presented as an explanation for one text would simply be repeated in an explanation for a different text.

Unable to deal with that you need some kind of explanation, so you've decided there is an all - powerful, all - knowing sentient being you call God who is responsible for, well, pretty much anything you can't explain with more verifiable causes.

There had to be an explanation, and here it was: the revolution in Jewish — and even in much Catholic — opinion had been achieved by a classic and brilliantly executed example of Soviet disinformation.

While we may believe in the Holy Spirit as a manifestation of God's presence in the world, we sometimes wonder if the church's early theologians invented this connection as an explanation of the continuity between Jesus and themselves, and if this invention didn't in turn and inadvertently lead to orthodox formulations about the Trinity that belied the Spirit's reality, much as the Kinsey Report misleads readers about the real joy and meaning of sex.

The role of the divine is much pondered» the furiously indignant Cain gets no more explanation for why his sacrifice was rejected here than he did in Genesis» but the actions are all committed by humans.

If the requisite disjunctive synthesis can not be explained by appeal to the doctrine that God values all possible worlds, this is not so much because evaluation is logically dependent upon gradations of importance, but because (accepting Christian's explanation of the absence of such gradations in the primordial nature) the logic of the doctrine itself entails that God be inextricably involved in the formation of actual worlds as «circles of convergence,» i.e., in «the orderings effected by individuals in the course of nature.»

This is a much neater and more logical system of explanation of origin, destiny, and differences of character than are either immortality or resurrection.

But the real explanation of our ineffectual preaching lies much deeper: far too many of us, far too much of the time, do not recognize the terrible truth that as preachers we are engaged in nothing other than the task of confronting our listeners with the very Word of God.

Still, without the personal level of knowledge that God exists, mentioned in my first sentence, no intellectual explanation or argument would hold much weight with me at all.

Places like the Grand Canyon also receive a much simpler explanation than the theory (which is rapidly losing favor) that the Grand Canyon was formed over millions of years by a small trickle of water.

In short, far from providing a clear explanation of how the economy works, conventional economics fails pretty much any test that it is given.

Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.

Much might be said in explanation from the point of view of hermeneutics, philosophy and national and personal psychology.

If then such a zealous learner, though not carrying things so far as to become a disciple, were to discourse loudly and volubly of how much he owed the Teacher, so that his eulogy was almost endless and its gilding priceless; if he were to resent our explanation that the Teacher had been merely an occasion, neither his eulogy nor his resentment could further our inquiry, since both had the same ground, namely, that though lacking in the courage to understand he had nevertheless not lacked the audacity to go beyond.

But to return to Whitehead's explicit position, we should observe that he believed that the great virtue of Christianity has been that it is not so much a metaphysic seeking some historical grounding as it is an historical fact and focus (found in Jesus) seeking for metaphysical explanation.

There are numerous other explanations for this verse which make much better sense of the verse itself and the context as a whole.

There is no tested evidence of these natural explanations, much less proof, but the existence of multiple natural possibilities negates the Big Bang and Inflation as proof of God (that doesn't mean it proves No God, it means that it can't prove God did it since there are other alternatives).

This piece reads much more like an opinion piece on God's morality than an explanation of why God flooded the Earth.

So while the we are not told here (or anywhere) much about these spiritual beings — we don't have an explanation of their powers or of what kind of effects they can have on the believers — Paul's point is that we don't need to worry, because Christ is far above them.