Sentences with phrase «much exposure to stocks»

For example, having too much exposure to stocks in a bear market or having too little exposure to stocks in a bull market.

Once you've determined how much exposure to the stock market is right for you, consider whether well - selected actively managed funds can reduce the volatility of your portfolio and the risk of loss.

If you are picking individual stocks to invest in, something I personally enjoy but do not recommend as a way to make money, then you may have the problem of too much exposure to the stock market.

Not exact matches

«But pretty much everybody needs exposure to stocks and bonds.

To be clear, MoneySense did that piece not so much to encourage investors to grab some indirect exposure to Bitcoin, but to make them aware of how their stock investments may already be being affected by the maniTo be clear, MoneySense did that piece not so much to encourage investors to grab some indirect exposure to Bitcoin, but to make them aware of how their stock investments may already be being affected by the manito encourage investors to grab some indirect exposure to Bitcoin, but to make them aware of how their stock investments may already be being affected by the manito grab some indirect exposure to Bitcoin, but to make them aware of how their stock investments may already be being affected by the manito Bitcoin, but to make them aware of how their stock investments may already be being affected by the manito make them aware of how their stock investments may already be being affected by the mania.

Further, exposure to Unattractive - or - worse rated stocks is much lower for JETS (11 % of assets) than for XLI (33 % of assets).

Further, exposure to Dangerous - or - worse rated stocks is much lower for Royce Small Cap Value (9 % of assets) than for IWN (36 of assets).

Personally, I don't like much exposure to resources and Canadian equities are 20 % of my allocation, so I prefer to buy stocks directly for that portion (realizing that I could potentially trail the index).

While I am hardly suggesting that one piles into European and Asian markets with reckless abandon, I am suggesting that investors carefully consider how much exposure might be appropriate to an individual stock.

This fund lets you benefit from the market's gains, which have historically averaged nearly 10 % per year, without too much exposure to any one stock.

This ETF represents a good option for investors who want exposure to Canadian dividend stocks and don't want to spend much time fiddling with their portfolios.

For example: This year, a client's portfolio may be outperforming the S&P 500 because of their portfolio's exposure to international stocks and long term bonds, which have gained much more than domestic stock markets.

In deciding how much of each stock to own, a focus on business Quality (as measured by profitability, stability and financial strength) helps us to maximise our exposure to those stocks which are both attractively valued and good quality and to avoid «value traps».

The problem is not so much stocks with direct exposure to Chinese demand — that is a manageable risk in the context of a portfolio.

Last week, I initiated a position in an ETF: S&P Metals and Mining (XME) as I do not own much of commodity or resources stocks and want to have some exposure to this beaten down sector.

I also initiated a position in an ETF: S&P Metals and Mining (XME) as I do not own much of commodity or resources stocks and want to have some exposure to this beaten down sector.

Factor exposure matters To reiterate: While dividend - paying stocks may have surprised investors with their robust performance in the face of rising interest rates following the Nov. 8 election, much of this performance can be explained by factor tilts.

There simply isn't much of a track record for currency hedging, so my default position is still unhedged exposure to foreign stocks.

Similar to you, I actually have enough to carry us through retirement without much stock exposure, but my plan is to get back in when valuation ratios return to more historically normal levels.

A researcher writing for Bloomberg summarized the findings of a Northern Trust Corp study explaining, «Unintended exposure caused annualized returns for smart - beta ETFs tied to dividend stocks to vary by as much as 80 percent over the past 10 years.»

If you're a DIY investor, I think ETFs are that much better for non-Canadian exposure where it's harder to choose individual stocks.

[2] While there isn't much smart about simply equal weighting a selection of stocks, a fundamental analysis of this approach shows exposure to the size premium.

Investors should reexamine their current allocation to determine how much international small - cap stocks exposure they have truly gained via their other international equity holdings.

Unintended exposure caused annualized returns for smart - beta ETFs tied to dividend stocks to vary by as much as 80 percent over the past 10 years, according to a research paper by Northern Trust Corp..

In recent years, I've comforted myself by occasionally rebalancing back to my portfolio's target percentages and by noting that foreign markets — which account for more than 40 % of my stock exposure — are much better value.

I'm not that interested in indexing, although for individuals who want completely passive exposure to stocks, value weighting certainly makes much more sense to me than market weighting (because market weighting systematically buys more of a stock as it goes up, thus forcing you -LSB-...]

But if you're a non-U.S. investor, buying funds that hedge currency exposure strikes me as the lesser of two evils: It's better to own a global stock portfolio that hedges currencies than take the risk of keeping much or all of your money in domestic stocks.

There are risk tolerance questionnaires available online that people can take to determine how much exposure they should have to risk assets like stocks.

Much of my summer's been spent searching out more stocks that offer decent exposure to distressed consumers / companies / assets, particularly in Europe.

So investors using broad - based Canadian ETFs may need to watch how much exposure they have to financials and resource sectors, but they needn't worry about overexposure to tech stocks.

In fact, the only way to get as much exposure to bonds, relative to stocks, as risk parity proscribes, is to borrow money against your portfolio and buy more bonds.

This results in having too much exposure to only one type of equity market, usually large - cap value and growth stocks (via S&P 500 ETFs).

``... the world's cultivated soils have lost between 50 and 70 percent of their original carbon stock, much of which has oxidized upon exposure to air to become CO2.

Ethereum's rise comes as initial coin offerings (ICO) are continuing to gain media exposure, so much so that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has begun to crack down on publicly - traded companies for using ICO - related claims to pump up their stock prices.