I do nt have
much faith in men since my husband is verbally and emotionally abusive towards me.
You put
much faith in man's abilities to keep an inst!tution going for 2000 years... why is the Catholic Church the only Christian religion that has maintained this much history?
Man puts too
much faith in Man and his opinions.
I don't usually put
much faith in man - in - the - street newspaper polls, but one by the Poughkeepsie Journal on last week's «historical storm of the century» had the ring of truth.
Not exact matches
I suppose that we couldn't expect
much more, since there is little incentive not to lie without fear of God... barring
faith in some truly
man - made myths that I'm sure this group is willing to offer.
With
faith in your heart, you do not need to pursue proof or empirical evidence through human means which you will never find because God Is Spirit, thus, so
much greater than mortal
men which He created who have limited knowledge.
To have
faith in man's ability to do good is
much simpler
in elegance and
much more feasible than to have
faith in an unseen force directing you and the people around you to do good.
But you should at least be honest and know that one who believes
in the forensic science of origins of life has to have as
much faith in the person asserting the theory as one has to have believing God was the witness to the event and told
man kind how the world came about
in simplistic terms.
I see straw
men employed all the time, most frequently with the topics of politics and religion, and if you haven't seen it, well, I'm not sure I would have
much faith in your sense of discernment.
If there is a God and there is just as
much for as against, But lets say there is a God and he made everything Including you and He gets to make the rules because lets face it hes a lot bigger then you, So unfortunately he only wants those who believe
in him based on the information given, Lets look at the facts based on the Book,, Some of his own angels turned on him and they see him every day... That had to hurt, So he decides With
man he only wants those with the
faith to believe based on His book and
faith found thru the holy spirit, If you refuse to believe then he cant use you, cant trust you, so he will choose to toss you aside, Hey I understand It ai nt fair, Your important, Your Smart, But unfortunately hes bigger then you and he has the Juice, You either play by the rules or wait and see what not believing leads too.
The problem is people putting so
much faith in a book written by
men.
Now regardless of how
much truth is found
in other
faiths, if the sacrifice of the God -
man Jesus is absent from their tenets, I can't accept that they are AS valid as Christianity.
There continues to be
much to learn from Kierkegaard, a
man who not only arrived at a radical and dialectical understanding of
faith, but who did so
in the context of the advent of a world that is totally profane.
As a
man of
Faith, I can tell you that I believe
in Satan a
much as I believe
in God — for the very simple reason that I have encountered evil — utter, absolute, and
in my face — but the spiritual dimension can not be taught — at all.
For I was with you
in much weakness, fear and trembling; and my speech and my message were not persuasive words of wisdom, but the demonstration of spirit and power, that your
faith might not rest
in the wisdom of
men but
in the power of God [I Cor.
Although we have proceeded with this discussion
in a structure
much simpler than that of Professor Paul Tillich, we shall attempt what he calls a «method of correlation,» whereby
man's existential questions are met by the answers of our Christian
faith.
The Bible even teaches to not have
faith in man much less
in his promises.
And not
in the way of a
man who spends way too
much time trying to disprove God on a «
faith and belief» blog.
If,
in all our religions, we had more
men like Gandhi, grateful for the discovery of truth
in other
faiths, how
much better a world this would be!
You put too
much faith in a book written hundreds of years after the «supposed» events my
men in power wishing to hold onto it and control the masses.
Why would it seem to me, a
man who desired so
much to feel his presence, desired so
much to rest
in the
faith and knowledge that God was
in control, why would it seem that God was completely and totally ignoring me?
It is
in this context that Paul says
much about the natural
man being «
in sin,» until its burden is lifted and victory is won through justification by
faith in Jesus Christ.
The idea of placing so
much faith in a book that was told orally for many generations after being based on some similar events before being put into writing by
MEN is not enough for some people to kneel and pray
in forgiveness for moral missteps or praise and thanks for creation.
I believe this
man is on one of those journeys, and when his journey is over he will come back with
much stronger
faith in God, and he will bring along others who will begin their new journey as well.
But the difficulty with this is always that it assumes two things: that
faith is concerned with one's attitude to God, which is true enough, but
much too broadly conceived; and that the crux of the challenge of Jesus is that
men should share his
faith, (Fuchs would want to express the matter
in words very different from these.)
Beyond this, Gutiérrez's observation, along with converging insights of other liberation theologians, has led me to realize that the ideology involved
in the traditional formulations of
faith's claims is as
much a problem as the mythology they involve
in establishing their credibility to contemporary
men and women.
Paul instructs older
men to be «temperate, worthy of respect, self - controlled, and sound
in faith,
in love and
in endurance» (Titus 2:2) and older women to be «reverent
in the way they live, not to be slanderers or addicted to
much wine, but to teach what is good» (Titus 2:3).
One has
faith in government,
faith in the general goodness of
man,
faith in the safety of foods and medicines... there is
much in the world that we do not understand, and
much that's too complex for us all to grasp.
how a
man rose from the dead and was not a zombie... how supposed humans started from a brother and sister committing incest but no birth defects occurred... the more educated the masses get
in science the more u know these things are possible no matter how
much «
FAITH» u have or how many times u rewrite the good books
The churches of America, though far from decadent, are doing
much less effective work than they might be doing with their resources, and the major cause of the difficulty lies
in failure to present the meaning and claims of the Christian
faith in terms that seem vital to the common
man.
@Taj if religion is the whole answer then why are so many poor people's from all over the world want too bring their religion that did not work
in their home countries too the USA if their
faith in their phony religion was working would not need too get on a airplane or boat why is so
much human oppression
in poverty
man made religious people's or they blowing them self up with bombs
Faith is a reality, everyone has faith in something, it has been proven that a man named Jesus (Emmanuel) who was followed by many and preached much, did e
Faith is a reality, everyone has
faith in something, it has been proven that a man named Jesus (Emmanuel) who was followed by many and preached much, did e
faith in something, it has been proven that a
man named Jesus (Emmanuel) who was followed by many and preached
much, did exist.
The striking works of Pratt, India and Its
Faiths (1915) and A Pilgrimage of Buddhism (1928) did
much to make these religions come alive for the first time for many Western readers; for Pratt had a gift not only of brilliance but of extraordinary human sympathy.10 These are clear instances of the increasing mobility of modern
man: each book was written as the result of travel
in the East.
And far from being a broken or dejected
man at the end of his life — as some critics maintain, the better to make their case against him seem plausible — Paul VI was carried and sustained by something
much stronger than anything
in this world, his
faith.
We have to review carefully the biblical
faith about human needs for
much in the contemporary search for a new Christian style of life and
much of the estrangement between Christian
faith and secular
man lies just here.
The New Testament is
in itself all that is necessary as a basis for Christian
faith, but
much light is thrown upon God's dealings with
man in the story of Israel's halting and gradual discovery of the true nature of God as universal, not national; as law - abiding, not capricious; as a God of peace, not war; as a God of justice, love and mercy rather than of wrath, and vengeance.
But of course, as
much as she is hoping that I will become a believer and then be content to spend every Sunday sitting
in church with her, I am hoping she will abandon her
faith, (as I did after 25 years) and then she will be content to spend her Sundays with me, the
man who loves her, and we could actually go off and do things together... or, we could compromise and I would be content with having one Sunday a month with her.
Bottom line, Wenger puts too
much faith in average players whereas Pellegrini, Mourinho would replace them with upgrades, even Van Gaal is set to completely get rid of the Tom Cleverly's
in the
Man U squad.
Slimani may just be that
man, but investing as
much as # 10 million
in just one player would be a huge leap of
faith from the Palace manager and his board.
SEE MORE: (Video) Former Invincible Gael Clichy sets up Arsenal equaliser at
Man City with bizarre assist Arsene Wenger's blind
faith in Arsenal star exactly why he faces so
much criticism Feature: Bewildering Hodgson
faith in Arsenal midfielder could spell bad news for Liverpool duo
Instead I'll give you a summary from a
Man United website, and they don't seem to put
much faith in this rumour either.
Here's an example: a woman will make a
man wait weeks to meet her through an online dating site but might turn around and put far too
much faith far too quickly
in a
man she met at a bar.
That the Australian release of The Incredible Hulk coincided with that of Speed Racer and The Happening suggests that the powers that be don't have as
much faith in their product as they did with Iron
Man.
But at least they are compelling characters: the sadly clairvoyant Dr. Manhattan (Billy Crudup), who knows to
much and is watching his
faith in humanity ebb
in to the ether; the vampirish Ozymandius (Matthew Goode), an effete tycoon who is the smartest
man in the world; the embittered Rorchach (Walter Kovacs), a psychopath whose toxic moods swim across his masked face as shifting ink blots; Nite Owl II (Dan Drieberg), who is basically Batman with a Clark Kent - like alter ego as a mild - mannered model of mid-life impotence; and the latex - sheathed, dominatrix - next - door, Silk Spectre II — played by Toronto actress and Maxim cover girl Malin Akerman, who made an appearance at the Toronto premiere I attended last night.
Wanting to join the priesthood, but not having
much religious
faith, I abandoned the idea, destining myself to live on the secular fringes of what was considered at the time the normal world (where the
men no longer were required to wear fedoras, but where sterile office cubicles
in some cold stone building became the bleak destiny of so many of my contemporaries).
Three
men in a Transit held together with
faith and copies of the Daily Star stop and chuckle that they wouldn't get
much in scrap for the Murciélago's carbonfibre.
I doubt it would have carried on for long with out CO Proudfoot as
much of the
men's
faith was
in him personally, even more so than Durga.
Christian
faith notwithstanding, Gray was too
much of an empiricist to accept Agassiz's metaphysical biology, and so even as he realized somewhat bitterly
in recent years how far he and Darwin were from agreeing on the subject of intelligent design
in nature, he stood staunchly by him as Darwin's
man in the New World, his first friend, collaborator, proxy, and shield.