The Trump Administration argues that the plan will generate
much faster economic growth that will offset much of the cost of the plan.
Not exact matches
There is a
much simpler and
faster way for Japan to stimulate
economic growth.
In that vein, Japan needs no reminding that there is a
much simpler and
faster way of stimulating
economic growth and getting out of deflation.
The reason tax mix matters is because it explains the Nordic countries, who have
much larger public sectors than does Canada, so
much so that according to the usual Fraser Institute logic that lower taxes overall would lead to
faster economic growth, they ought to be complete basket cases.
Right now, investors and traders from Wall Street to Main Street, whether optimists or pessimists, are assuming an
economic recovery that's
much faster and
much more robust than that... A period of lower - than - average
economic growth would lead to lower - than - average earnings
growth.
However, base effects on energy prices will be
much less favorable down the road and, combined with a tighter labor market and
faster economic growth, could result in a meaningful acceleration in inflation pressures.
Asia especially has witnessed rapid
growth in energy use and emissions over that period, driven by its
fast - paced
economic development — yet per capita emissions of industrialised countries remain
much higher.
To be really clear, if the ideas of people like Bob Ayres have merit [that energy * efficiency is a big component of
economic growth, i.e.,
much of «Total Factor Productivity»], it is * even * more important to move
faster and harder on efficiency and sustainable - energy replacements, and to stretch oil & gas supplies as long as possible.