The car has somehow become inseparably linked to the concept of freedom, yet it has taken away so
much freedom from society.
Not exact matches
Seeking entry into this field at mid-life meant competing with established professionals or those
much younger than me, many holding a degree in journalism or another directly related course of study, an experience - rich resume to support their interest, and the
freedom to work long hours in an office away
from home.
It's the same
freedom I get
from letting go of attachments to anything, but I used to value books so
much that I gained a lot of
freedom in this case.
Men and women who lead and work in businesses around Wyoming — of all ages and
from every walk of life — talk about how
much they enjoy the
freedoms of our state.
For digital nomads with jobs they can do
from anywhere, the concept of
freedom is just that
much more enticing.
After several embarrassing setbacks, Republican leaders, under pressure
from the White House, spent
much of last week weighing whether to hold a vote on the measure that included the new amendment, which was negotiated by New Jersey Representative Tom MacArthur and North Carolina Representative Mark Meadows, who chairs the House
Freedom Caucus.
It's embarrassing that so many Americans, people who say they believe in
freedom and equality, have spent so
much time and energy trying to justify being anti gay marriage - with false arguments
from the Bible (as thought that should be the only source of their decisions).
No, seeking to gain release (aphesis)
from our sins through confession and repentance is about whether or not we gain
freedom from the destructive power of sin in our lives which seeks to wreak havoc in our lives, our health, our marriages, our family, our finances, our jobs, and pretty
much everything else.
In
much contemporary discourse,
freedom is seen as emancipation
from God.
The political theory assumed that people benefit so
much from that order that it is rational for them to enter into contractual agreements that sacrifice considerable personal
freedom.
For instance, inasmuch as the founders» notion of free self - government rests on an essentially Lockean conception of
freedom as power outside and prior to truth (however
much God or truth imposes an extrinsic obligation to obey, and however reasonable it is to do so in view of future rewards and punishments), then American liberty will eventually erode the moral and cultural foundations of civil society inherited
from Protestant Christianity.
I receive a full time salary
from the church (less than $ 84k), but
much of the
freedom that you have described as a benefit I feel I experience, because I know if tomorrow things changed radically, I have my hands and my tools, and my knowledge.
Partners who can allow each other the inner
freedom to grow toward the realization of God - given potential, who can allow each «to drink
from his own individual cup» (12) do
much to meet each other's need.
I think mary jane needs to be legalized not necessarily because of the hypocrisy and that we should have the «
freedom» as
much as the windfall of cash
from growing it, selling it and taxing it, the medicinal properties it can be used for, the huge amount of space available in prisons that would open up and house criminals doing really bad things instead beng caught with a pound of a specific plant.
How
much would you pay for a girl's
freedom from sex slavery?
Whereas Pagels discusses second - century theologians who offer alternatives to Augustine's problematic
freedom, she ignores the great «heretic» Marcion, who finally concluded that the creator of a world in which there is so
much evil is a deeply flawed deity, the very God
from whom we must be redeemed.
I don't know because I am not there myself (crossing the divide
from Christian to atheist) but I have read so many who have crossed like you who say how
much relief and
freedom they felt.
i remember now seeing this one movie with mid-east people drama in it — don't remember to
much about the movie except this one scene of men in mid-east dress advancing in protest in mass upon these soldier guards over something these people in mass thought was rightfully theirs (a
freedom from violence was one of these things they thought was rightfully theirs).
To speak of a Creator without a creation is to talk linguistic nonsense — quite as
much as to speak of creaturely
freedom as if it were a
freedom apart
from dependence upon God's initiating and continuing concern.
There one might well argue that
freedom from love was very
much the goal.
While the transition
from tough biker to tough
freedom fighter might not be that great a stretch, Childers has made another leap that is in some ways
much greater.
This second trait of
freedom in the light of hope removes us further than the first trait did
from the existential interpretation, which is too
much centered on the present decision; for the ethics of the mission has communitarian, political, and even cosmic implications, which the existential decision, centered on personal interiority, tends to hide.
so
much tLk but we all the sAme went feeling the treAt 2 ones
freedom wAr is not the answer neeither peace but
much more important is the wAnt above save us all
from the pAth we tAken
Locke =
Freedom From Nature (and implicitly history) and Darwin = Nature is
much closer to the truth.
It may be that I have laid too
much stress on the future reference of forgiveness, but I did not forget to insist that there can only be
freedom for the future where there has been deliverance
from my own particular past.
It is so
much easier to condemn the sick and wounded (of body and spirit), than it is to take them in and proclaim their
freedom from the oppression that is foisted upon them by people like you (as you did me in your post).
The general idea is very clear: Men in our time desire some things very
much — escape
from suffering war and other disaster,
freedom and a sense of their dignity, abundance and peace.
Without so
much as a blink of the eye, Safranski invokes Schleiermacher to transition
from a vague «religious feeling» to a discussion of the purported «connection between mythology and the feeling of
freedom.»
5 I assume that ideas are in some sense copied
from impressions, but I attribute
much more
freedom to the imagination and intellect than does Hume.
people who truly love liberty as
much as the «right» claims to need to respect the liberty of
freedom of, and
FROM, religion!
«That said, if the churches do not take the opportunity now to «advocate» and «teach» why same - sex marriage is wrong for everyone (i.e., harmful to children, to the couple, and undermining of a culture of marriage), religious people should not expect to find a lot of sympathy for their right to exercise their religious
freedom to dissent
from same - sex marriage,» Esbeck told CT. «In other words, church leaders no longer enjoy the luxury of not teaching biblical marriage, as
much as large numbers of the laity don't want to hear it.
Comic strips
from the 1950s through the 1980s took an increasingly secular attitude toward religious symbols, Heeren said, whereas The Simpsons displays a «
much greater
freedom in the lampooning of these symbols.»
Much of Obama's remarks focused on threats to religious
freedom abroad,
from China to Egypt to Sudan and Burma.
Think of how
much unnecessary anguish and self - torment we've endured, as well as how
much freedom we've forgone,
from seeing ourselves as the only one.
the power to give, the power to love, the paradoxical power of «weakness»... God's power is thus
much greater than the compelling force of a tyrant who makes others submit against their will... his power is sufficient to transform a willful person
from self - centeredness to love, without destroying or even violating the tender plant of
freedom.61
Furthermore, this bodily conflict between the mother and her emergent child anticipates the often
much more painful act of separation, when the child, exercising the newly awakened powers made possible by his large head, reaches for his own autonomous knowledge of good and had, and repeats the original rise and fall
from obedience and innocence in the ever - recurring saga of human
freedom and «enlightenment.»
But the quantitative mixture and order of these moods vary so
much from one age of the world,
from one system of thought, and
from one individual to another, that you may insist either on the dread and the submission, or on the peace and the
freedom as the essence of the matter, and still remain materially within the limits of the truth.
Thus one may conclude that to Whitehead
freedom is not so
much a right as it is a duty and an obligation; these derive
from the religious level and apply to the level of ethical life.
Over at the Ashbrook Center's website, David Tucker, of the Naval Postgraduate School and an Ashbrook fellow asks us to consider how
much freedom we would sacrifice to be safe
from terrorism.
If we are to be honest, the threat to this
freedom comes as
much from the collapse of cohesive church communities, especially in what once was the Bible Belt, as
from Washington, D.C..
The leaders always had good consciences, for conscience in them coalesced with Will, and those who looked on their face were as
much smitten with wonder at their
freedom from inner restraint as with awe at the energy of their outward performances.
If and when this mosque is built - and I presume it will since it is truly our
freedom that binds and fetters so
much as to allow such a travesty to even be considered - I think that fifty years
from now people will wonder at the amazing and complete victory of Al Queda as to completely raze our symbols of democracy and capitalism and in its place raise up a mosque.
Dale Van Kley's new book, The Religious Origins of the French Revolution, seeks to revive a sort of Whiggish interpretation of the French Revolution as the struggle for
freedom against sacral monarchy, with
much of the ideological discourse of the revolutionaries deriving
from little expected religious controversies» beginning with the rise and fall of Calvinism in Catholic France, continuing through the struggles over theological Jansenism, and ending in the political struggles of the French high courts of justice, the parlements, with the administrative monarchy of the eighteenth century.
Emancipation
from the endless discussions of committee meetings, trying to solve problems in both religious and political communities that had hitherto occupied so
much of my time, was a desirable
freedom from the chores of a democratic society; but it also meant an emancipation
from responsibility — a doubtful boon, because responsibility engages us in the causes of moral, political and religious movements.
(«Cautionary Verses for Children»: this title of a
much used work, published early in the nineteenth century, shows how far the muse of evangelical protestantism in England, with her mind fixed on the idea of danger, had at last drifted away
from the original gospel
freedom.
This decade thus offers mobile (or desktop) videoconferencing units which can be wheeled
from room to room, making video forums possible - an easy technical «
freedom of assembly» at
much less cost.
«Individuals define themselves in a significant way through their intimate sexual relationships with others,» and «
much of the richness of a relationship will come
from the
freedom an individual has to choose the form and nature of these intensely personal bonds.»
For me, it all started becoming
much more loving and I began to find
much more
freedom and balance when I threw out the «being good» and the «being bads»
from my life.
[5.8] There are several other well recognised criteria which are
much more indicative of whether there is market power, particularly the existence of substantial entry barriers, and relative
freedom from constraints imposed on a firm by its competitors and customers.
But they were
much more cautious
from the start on Wednesday, retreating and allowing the
freedom of a spacious Wembley pitch to their hosts.