It means that we underestimate how
much freedom there can be in what looks like a disadvantage.
Not exact matches
There isn't as much overlap between Gannett and Tribune's markets and titles as there was with Freedom, so it's possible the DOJ won't be conce
There isn't as
much overlap between Gannett and Tribune's markets and titles as
there was with Freedom, so it's possible the DOJ won't be conce
there was with
Freedom, so it's possible the DOJ won't be concerned.
If only
there was a formula or a chart like the 401k by Age chart which gives people guidance on how
much to save and for how long in order to reach financial
freedom.
While being self - employed has many benefits such as having more flexibility or
freedom to choose your own schedules, working as
much or as little as you want, etc.,
there are downsides to being self - employed as well.
Owen has helped me come
much closer to financial
freedom and this book lays the path to get
there.
I think
there was definitely a time where it was where I needed to be, but I finally got to the point where I thought I could either keep doing this and make good money at it, or I could stop and not make
much money at all but feel
freedom and purpose.»
people, get involved in what is really going on here...
there's not
much time left to change our course back to the way our country was meant to operate, namely
freedom.
Tyrants who try to subdue Christian nations can not keep them in hand —
there is way too
much an emphasis on personal
freedom and having the conscience responsible to God alone, not a controlled state.
Modernity is based on reason and
freedom, both gifts of God, and
there has indeed been
much incremental progress in the rational and technical mastery of nature.
Whereas Pagels discusses second - century theologians who offer alternatives to Augustine's problematic
freedom, she ignores the great «heretic» Marcion, who finally concluded that the creator of a world in which
there is so
much evil is a deeply flawed deity, the very God from whom we must be redeemed.
The Symposium agreement that «each is to drink as
much as he wants and
there is to be no compulsion about it» does not emerge when students, feeling the compulsion of peer pressure, surrender their
freedom to moderate their drinking or abstain.
I don't know because I am not
there myself (crossing the divide from Christian to atheist) but I have read so many who have crossed like you who say how
much relief and
freedom they felt.
The «root» of anyone's» frailties is found in either fearing GOD or denying GOD even though
there is a third way, «Loving GOD for HIS Tenderness and
much Mercy in giving Us All our spiritual and social and cultured
freedoms!».
There is
much information on countries the editor knows, and little on countries he doesn't» even though they may be the worst violators of religious
freedom in the world.
There's so
much freedom in the ability to enjoy a day without thinking of work.
The United States was pretty
much formed by Christians, seeing the problems it caused in
there homeland and elsewhere they added the whole
freedom of religion clause.
If the Gays are not happy here and the way people have the
freedom to do what they pretty
much please, without violating the law, I would suggest that they move to the middle east and do their complaing
there.
There one might well argue that
freedom from love was very
much the goal.
He highlighted Britain's achievements as a «pluralist democracy which places great value on
freedom of speech,
freedom of political affiliation and respect for the rule of law, with a strong sense of the individual's rights and duties, and of the equality of all citizens before the law and noted that
there was
much in common here with Catholic social teaching.
On the one hand,
there is
much oppression and lack of the
freedoms of thought, speech, action, livelihood, and self - fulfillment at its best which every person, in the dignity of personhood, ought to have.
I think that
there might be three stages in the process: the initial bondage of works, the encounter with Godâ $ ™ s mind - blowing Grace and then the new
freedom to become part of a
much bigger plan because, at this point, thereâ $ ™ s nothing you want more.
But
there is a work of God in the midst of this dark reality which brings forth matured, self - reliant, free persons whose
freedom has been nurtured by their participation in that friction of will against will which makes up so
much of life.
It may be that I have laid too
much stress on the future reference of forgiveness, but I did not forget to insist that
there can only be
freedom for the future where
there has been deliverance from my own particular past.
Although this example has a modern ring to it,
there is nothing really new about the problem it presents, which is: How is it that
freedom and purpose that determine so
much about us arise in a world that seems to run entirely on mechanical laws?
There is
much to agree with in Luke Timothy Johnson's essay «After the Big Chill: Intellectual
Freedom and Catholic Theologians,» published in Commonweal.
But Judaism, Christianity and Islam each evolved out of an initially fluid faith tradition, in which
there was still
much freedom for creative change and development.
In human experience we can not but believe that although
much of what we are each moment is simply the result of the past, in each moment
there is also some
freedom.
But within these ultimate boundaries, these absolute prohibitions,
there's
much more room for
Freedom and Advice (not prohibution).
There is the other factor that your country is very
much a part of our lives and so we will continue to take advantage of something you seem to hate -
FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!!
How
much do you want too bet, when he gets
there, that he wants to destroy the
freedom of others because he is Muslim.
Locke promoted the facile harmony between rational independence and moral dependence with so
much success that modern higher education does not fathom that
there ever was a tension in the first place, that reason and morality aren't simply identical, that rational
freedom does not exhaust the whole of virtue.
[5.8]
There are several other well recognised criteria which are much more indicative of whether there is market power, particularly the existence of substantial entry barriers, and relative freedom from constraints imposed on a firm by its competitors and custo
There are several other well recognised criteria which are
much more indicative of whether
there is market power, particularly the existence of substantial entry barriers, and relative freedom from constraints imposed on a firm by its competitors and custo
there is market power, particularly the existence of substantial entry barriers, and relative
freedom from constraints imposed on a firm by its competitors and customers.
There can't be too much regimentation and there can't be too much fre
There can't be too
much regimentation and
there can't be too much fre
there can't be too
much freedom.
but now with Mkhitaryan, JW and Aaron playing he will have more
freedom because
there are other play makers on our team so Ozil wont be so crowded as
much and if he is the others can almost do the job
Winterburn is talking about how the players in his period of play had more
freedom in their life, and
there wasn't so
much pressure bound onto the players.
players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile
there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so
much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch...
there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more
freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for
much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes
I have enjoyed my «
freedom» but
there is so
much more to enjoy with someone you mutually respect and freely love.
I wish
there was an option of attaching it to the seat because sometimes too
much freedom is not that good (especially in the store where Sophia always tries to grab stuff of the shelves).
First and foremost, I want to say thank you so
much for serving, thank you for helping to protect our
freedom and or doing what you do and putting your life out
there for us every day.
There are certainly different ideas about how
much freedom kids should be allowed to have.
«Today
there's
much more creativity and
freedom,» says Mencos.
There are many reasons a mama can get stressed out over nursing - supply, nursing in public, having to restrict certain things, and even not having as
much freedom as a formula feeding mom.
The result is a tongue that is «tied» more tightly to the bottom of the mouth, preventing as
much freedom and movement as
there might otherwise be.
There's so
much freedom when you're working for yourself.
There is so
much freedom in allowing myself to pick - and - choose my own teaching method.
There is
much to commend in the republican account of
freedom as non-domination and it may have value as an ideal for a republican political movement to pursue.
It gets sticky in the second part of the question, how
much can Article 9 be rewritten... to that,
there's actually quite a bit of
freedom.
LP News, the national party's publication of record, has been
there to celebrate its victories, accomplishment, strategies, and hopes for
much less government, more
freedom and peace.
There will be a type of law, there will not be much more freedom than there exists under capitalism, unlike what will be the case in communism - the stateless, classless soc
There will be a type of law,
there will not be much more freedom than there exists under capitalism, unlike what will be the case in communism - the stateless, classless soc
there will not be
much more
freedom than
there exists under capitalism, unlike what will be the case in communism - the stateless, classless soc
there exists under capitalism, unlike what will be the case in communism - the stateless, classless society.
According to Matthews,
there is as
much freedom and as
much encouragement to use creativity to find innovative solutions in industry as anywhere else.