Sentences with phrase «much fuel really»

Not exact matches

Much like Santi Cazorla, or any Spanish midfielder really, the tiny Benat is a creative wizard and has been the fuel for Ruben Castro this year.

But that's irrelevant to the spirit of the question, since (1) Democratic politicians in fossil fuel states pretty much do the same thing (See West Virginia's Democrat Manchin); and (2) Such behavior is really industry agnostic, and every politician of every party whose constituents are over-represented in a particular industry will of course behave the same way about competing disruptive industry; and (3) The main opposition is not on alternative energy per se, but on measures to tax / disrupt fossil fuel one.

Certainly everybody that I saw in my short time was extremely interested in purchasing a car and if they happen to be from the more upwardly mobile kind of middle class, they were very interested in buying not a fuel - efficient car but a hummer even, you know, pretty much following the exact same model as the American aspiration or, you know, the «American dream» model and certainly the suburbs seem to be a growing trend and if you noticed that, Philip, you know, I visited a suburb called Orange County outside of Beijing and it really looked like Orange County and they even had like the palm trees and everything and I saw these in all the cities I visited Chongqing, Chengdu, various other cities that I visited, they were ringed by suburbs and the folks who live there, you know, the privileged few were using cars to commute into the cities for work.

Actually if you calculate, you think about those 600 fossil fuel power plants, and if you calculate how much money is spent to purchase the fuel, that's the big thing that people don't really think about.

I started referring to my concoction as «golden fuel,» because it started to really feel like the catalyst that fueled my ability to do all the other things I needed to do to get my health back (full disclosure: I loved my blend so much I ended up starting a company to share it with other people).

After working with Anne for several months, I feel so much more comfortable around food because she gave me the tools that I needed to determine what my body really wants: what foods feel good, fuel me, and nourish not only my body but also my soul.»

it's not going to be as viable fuel source, at least as much as if you were just doing cardio, or slow cardio that wasn't really taxing your muscle.

You really need to tax your body so that you're using its fuel sources as much as possible.

July 29, 2012 • As much as Bradley exudes funky, live - wire energy — his years impersonating James Brown weren't wasted — what really fuels his music is perspective: An understanding of hardship infuses every note.

If you are carrying things in your trunk that you don't really need like golf clubs, a bag of clothes and huge bottles of water, take them out and you'll see how much your fuel costs will drop.

I just do my job of fine - tuning things — different track conditions, weight, fuel, burnouts — things that are much more detail - oriented as opposed to overall really big steps.

I m really lucky with the car, but the fuel economy isn t really that great... its not about the money, but I have a bad feeling burning so much gas, cause I driving a lot of km / year.

And I have to say I really like the digital readout displaying how much fuel you've used represented in dollars and cents.

Other small annoyances include the bulky, overhand - grip parking brake that likes to run interference for the center armrest, as well as the digital fuel range arrow that can be mistaken for the gas flap indicator — admittedly only an issue for those who don't drive their car much or have really bad memory.

Is the fuel economy of a crossover really that much better than that of a traditional sport utility?

Really, though, the Mustang is not a prime example of clever packaging: The Mitsubishi Eclipse is about 6 inches shorter and 4 inches narrower, but it has much more cargo room, a bigger fuel tank, and nearly the same headroom and legroom in the front and rear.

Being very similar iterations of the same base engine, there's not really much to separate them in terms of fuel economy (both versions return 19mpg in the city, irrespective of how many wheels are being driven, and the 400 - hp's 26mpg in all - wheel drive and 27mpg in rear - wheel drive formats are only one miles - per - gallon down on what the 300 - hp unit can muster), so there's very little holding you back if you can stomach the Red Sport's $ 7,000 premium over the lesser six - cylinder model.

Given my limited time behind the wheel, I can't really know how much the real - world fuel economy has improved for this generation, and the EPA estimates haven't been announced yet.

It manages to attain 22 mpg in the city and 28 mpg on the highway, so you don't really sacrifice all that much in fuel economy.

We'll have to sample the car on UK roads to see if it's really worth the extra money, however — and we suspect that the premium price and fuel efficiency penalty may be a bit too much for some.

But odds are if you're considering the hybrid, you care as much if not more about fuel economy, and here the hybrid shows where it really excels with potential short - range EV driving, a stop - start system that shuts the engine down at a stop to save fuel, and other useful tricks.

As much as I hate fuel surcharges — and I really, really hate fuel surcharges — I would rather fly with ANA.

The screenshots and video below offer our first look into Kaos Studios» second game under THQ, Homefront, and as someone who liked their previous game, Frontlines: Fuel of War, I have to say it's hard to really say anything much about them at this point.

The rise in CO2 emissions due to the burning of fossil fuels from 1880 through the 1940's was not sufficient to have played a major role in the considerable global temperature rise that took place during that period — so if we want to presume that sea level rise is prompted by global temperature rise (along with concomitant melting of glaciers, etc.) then we can't really attribute very much of the rise in sea levels during that period to CO2.

Energy is not the same as CO2: it's perfectly possible to get all the energy we really need without burning fossil fuels, the arguments have been about which technologies to use, how much they'll cost, and how soon they might be brought on line.

However, it is important to keep in mind that we might easily more than double it if we really don't make much effort to cut back (I think the current estimated reserves of fossil fuels would increase CO2 by a factor of like 5 or 10, which would mean a warming of roughly 2 - 3 times the climate sensitivity for doubling CO2 [because of the logarithmic dependence of the resulting warming to CO2 levels]-RRB-... and CO2 levels may be able to fall short of doubling if we really make a very strong effort to reduce emissions.

Their critics say their stance, however well intentioned, will produce the real delays, given how much can be done now simply by cutting energy waste with tools already on the shelf — ranging from strengthening efficiency standards to eliminating billions of dollars in persistent fossil - fuel subsidies that continue to make coal and oil much cheaper than they really are when all their hidden costs are revealed.

I find that even some of my most informed friends, people who explain to me what really happened with various space and aircraft disasters based on their own critical review of the available information on the subject, have problems discussing topics like global climate change, the end of oil as a fuel, because they haven't even asked some obvious questions, much less done any research.

If only that much people (one out of ten) could manage to have a really decent life, yet, with (and historically only once was) «easy» fossil fuel energy source available, is it reasonable to expect that 10 times more people will manage to do so in future without that exceptional source of energy and much less «easy» renewable energy sources?

I read the NY Times online and tend not to pay much attention to the ads so I don't really experience the effect of full Exxon page «advertorials,» and I totally tune out TV ads and rarely watch TV news, but this barrage of full page ads and the fossil fuel industry's command of policy, media and political resources is an incredible misallocation of funds, a market failure of monumental scale.

Considering that many of its higher profile vehicles really suck fuel like there's no tomorrow, you may not think that the US military concerned itself much with reducing fuel usage, but based on a recent announcement

As modern industrial agriculture has been described as a process to turn fossil fuel into food it really does not make much sense to then turn this food back into fossil fuel substitute.

Switching to fossil fuels really didn't change much.

So, if your argument is that we know we are significantly changing the concentration of a major gas that impacts the temperature of the earth's surface, and you hold that all of our attempts to project how seriously this will impact us are useless, then we really need to ratchet back our use of fossil fuels quicker and more radically since in your world, the impacts may be much WORSE then the computer models.

«Ethanol should be saving us twice as much oil as it is today because we are letting really big, inefficient flex - fuel vehicles on the road,» said Nathanael Greene, senior policy analyst at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

firstly the IPCC assumes that fossil fuel reserves are much more abundent than they really are.

Considering that many of its higher profile vehicles really suck fuel like there's no tomorrow, you may not think that the US military concerned itself much with reducing fuel usage, but based on a recent announcement that's apparently not the case.

Surely a building that small could be insulated really well and not need so much technology and fuel.

Violators of the ban face the Bulgarian equivalent of a $ 65 million fine — which in the scheme of the fossil fuel industry's cash flow really isn't that much.

We don't really know how much money the fossil fuel industry has pumped into its Manufactured Doubt campaign, since they don't have to tell us.

Still, that doesn't really matter much when you're trying to attract the fuel - conscious crowd.

However the part about natural gas needs to be reconsidered: There are better uses for natural gas, there are dirtier fuels to displace, it isn't nearly as good a transportation fuel as is claimed, it won't bring much greater energy independence, and it isn't really a viable long term solution to our energy problems.

We have dammed all the places that can really generate hydro and wind and solar are just not baseload enough — so you need just as much fossil fuel power as backup as if you had no solar or wind in the first place.

«For us, the science is really clear; we need to keep 80 percent of the world's gas, oil and coal reserves within the ground if we are going to have any chance of keeping the rise in climate to within 2degC, so we think divesting from fossil fuels is very much a pertinent issue of the age, and we need to start acting now.

Well, we don't really have all that much info at the moment, but the phone is rumored to be fueled by MediaTek's new Helio X20 (MT6797) 64 - bit deca - core processor, and this might actually be one of the first devices out in the market to be powered by this SoC.