Sentences with phrase «much funding there»

Not exact matches

While much of the launch fundraising was in later stage investments, there have been 11 early stage deals (also known as seed and Series A funding rounds) so far this year, including the $ 15 million round of Australian satellite company Myriota.
With the Conservatives in power, there really is much more of a belief that health care should really be just left to the provinces, and the extent to which the feds are involved if at all is really to support the Canada Health Act through the transfer of funding, but not really to look at whether or not [the act] is actually being fulfilled.
The funding will continue to the end of the calendar year and into next year, but that's about as much money as there is to run those programs.
The National Health Service is not «going broke» (although there is a debate over how much funding it should get).
«There's so much ammunition» feeding this movement, agrees Mike Novogratz, a billionaire former hedge fund manager who now has 30 % of his net worth invested in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
There are no limits on how much you can contribute and the funds can be liquidated and used for any purpose at any time.
While Schuler would argue that the damage of the inevitable bubble bursting will be limited to companies that have received, or want to receive, funding and to the private investors and those funds invested in them, there is always the potential for a much wider impact on employment and real estate values.
With shovels to ground scheduled for late summer 2013 and completion in 2016, there's time to secure the remaining funds, but not much.
(«Trust me, we would need a much bigger fund if there were more companies like this out there,» he says.)
As for the problem of redemptions, there were, as had been feared, a large number of mutual - fund shareholders who demanded millions of dollars of their money in cash when the market crashed, but apparently the mutual funds had so much cash on hand that in most cases they could pay off their shareholders without selling substantial amounts of stock.
from Unicef's side this is clearly about raising much needed funds in a very difficult fundraising climate, and there will also be further Unicef brand recognition and awareness which is again much needed in the face of charity competition and indeed fatigue.
I would guess that there is a much sharper drop in the chance of your business surviving for 2 years during a recession caused by a financial crisis where it is much more difficult to raise funding.
When all you're doing is picking a few different funds to track a few different markets, there simply isn't all that much to tinker with.
There are no limits on how much a purchaser can invest and no limits on how much funding the company can raise.
Sure there are funds that add in commodities, currencies and private equity, but the margin for error becomes that much smaller in a low return environment.
There are a range of factors that affect the flows of goods and services across international borders, but the sustained outflow of funds from some emerging economies witnessed in recent years may have as much to do with the limited intermediation capacity of the local financial systems as with the scarcity of profitable domestic investment opportunities.
Stephen Dodson, manager of the $ 12 million Bretton Fund, is skeptical that there is that much of a millennial mindset.
There is an excess of funds, which is why I've been able to continue writing so much to hopefully help others and put together an ebook for charity.
However, because Blooom is limited to the funds offered by your employer's plan, there is only so much that can be done.
If all that rebalancing sounds like too much to take on, there are target date funds that re-balance for you according to the year you intend to retire.
You may not want to do this if your existing 401k has high costs or limited investment choices, but I think most plans now have low cost index funds to choose from, so for many people, there wouldn't be much downside risk.
There is nothing close to adequate funding in place to pay these costs, much less the forbidding costs of global warming.
This is where angels can be so much better than VCs: they're willing to listen, can act quickly, there's less pressure to be a «me - too» investor, they don't mind contrarian stances, and there are no LPs, fund lifetime or thesis mandates they're beholden to.
Leaving aside materiality — and I guess there's some question as to whether a court would find it material that Jana Partners is building an activist stake, though maybe not much of one — there's no breach of a duty if Jana «officially» decides to leak its information to other hedge funds.
Today there's so much money chasing quarterly performance or driven by program trading, index funds or ETFs.
There are rules stating how much of their profit they have to distribute to shareholders (90 %), but, like dividend income funds, used without other investments they might be considered to overexpose to a single asset class.
... But the Patriot Fund's filings do not address whether there will be any limits on how much each contributor can give.
First, there is no longer much of a market for federal funds.
But there is the danger that they would own so much that they would be the controlling shareholders, and fund managers generally don't want to get involved with owning companies.
BTW I think the L&G Global fund actually tracks an «ex-UK» index, so that may risk too much on the correlation with non-UK bonds (especially if we continue to import inflation with a weak currency... don't go there).
After submitting a request, there's a wait of up to 5 business days before funds are credited into the account, which is much less than the traditional wait period of up to several months for most brokers.
The dispersion in bond fund returns has been fairly narrow compared to stock funds in the past, but I think there could be a much greater dispersion going forward as certain investors will be able to navigate the challenging fixed income environment better than others.
While there was much fanfare last month after the ECB loaned 523 banks 489 billion euros, the actual amount of new funds was a more modest number.
After a certain point, it's debatable how much diversification benefit there is to adding more funds.
Irrespective of that, we know that because there has been so much value created in the space that there will be a lot of business models that will come together, and they will be funded in order to continue to disrupt businesses that have higher margins.
There is so much «opportunity» in the future for funding women entrepreneurs in the VC space.
There are always risks but compared to common stocks, mutual funds are a much less risky way to invest.
There is no doubt that permanent capital is a much more valuable asset for a funds management business than the same amount of temporary capital.
There's nothing wrong with R&D spending, but a number of critics argue that Gates» money would be much better spent on funding and scaling existing renewable technology.
Santorum has had trouble funding and staffing his campaign (to go with his lack of executive experience) and he has a habit of expressing his opinions in a maximally alienating way and there is no reason to expect that he will ever get much better.
There is, oddly, no mention of any results whatever from that research, other than the oblique suggestion that it would be much improved if government funds could be brought to bear.
Also you might like to know that there was an executive order issued by the president prohibiting the use of public funds for elective abortions which was pretty much the impetus that got the health care bill passed.
Would there be this much out rage if she had given the bulk f her money to the United Nations Children's Fund, UNICEF?
The amount of food waste and food losses that result from our food systems are alarming, but as the 2016 Crawford Fund Annual Conference «Waste not, want not: the circular economy to food security» showed, there is much that can be done to reduce this food waste, to prevent these food losses, and to eliminate hunger.
A three - way contest war for Warrnambool Cheese & Butter, interest in Wesfarmers» insurance business, which was picked up by Insurance Australia Group, and a bidding war for Commonwealth Property Office Fund, are significant as there has not been much of a competitive process outside the infrastructure space for three years.
As of the start of 2018, the Endowment Fund had reached a total of # 2.8 M and the 1869 Society # 21K in recurring gifts, so whilst these figures are positive there is still much work to do.
Part of that money will reportedly go to the Red Cross, but there's no confirmation right now of the exact breakdown of how much money is going to which organizations, or what other relief efforts might be receiving funds.
But there is actually truly not much yet from transiting from no funds for transfer to now a little more funds.
How can there be an exodus unless Arsenal fund it — the players to be sold are on too much money.
As much as I would like to hate your comment above I have to agree with what you've said here I know there are a hardcore of bloggers on here that will be derisory and downright insulting (Keyboard warriors are always really tough) but unless we have the two new additions we need then we will sadly be another fourth spot contender again, its as simple as that the current squad is nearly there but nearly there is not THERE and I hate to say it but I think its gonna be another case of Wenger stubbornly trying to convince the world he is a genius by winning things without spending much OR by lamenting the injury problems and bad refs and being desultory about big oil funded clubs while the Club we love turns a fat profit for the board and we see no silverware atthere are a hardcore of bloggers on here that will be derisory and downright insulting (Keyboard warriors are always really tough) but unless we have the two new additions we need then we will sadly be another fourth spot contender again, its as simple as that the current squad is nearly there but nearly there is not THERE and I hate to say it but I think its gonna be another case of Wenger stubbornly trying to convince the world he is a genius by winning things without spending much OR by lamenting the injury problems and bad refs and being desultory about big oil funded clubs while the Club we love turns a fat profit for the board and we see no silverware atthere but nearly there is not THERE and I hate to say it but I think its gonna be another case of Wenger stubbornly trying to convince the world he is a genius by winning things without spending much OR by lamenting the injury problems and bad refs and being desultory about big oil funded clubs while the Club we love turns a fat profit for the board and we see no silverware atthere is not THERE and I hate to say it but I think its gonna be another case of Wenger stubbornly trying to convince the world he is a genius by winning things without spending much OR by lamenting the injury problems and bad refs and being desultory about big oil funded clubs while the Club we love turns a fat profit for the board and we see no silverware atTHERE and I hate to say it but I think its gonna be another case of Wenger stubbornly trying to convince the world he is a genius by winning things without spending much OR by lamenting the injury problems and bad refs and being desultory about big oil funded clubs while the Club we love turns a fat profit for the board and we see no silverware at all.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z