Sentences with phrase «much future spending»

Understanding how much future spending, or consumption, an investor's savings can support is critical in planning for retirement.

Not exact matches

That in turn depends on agreeing how much the U.K. owes for past and future commitments to EU spending, from infrastructure projects to the pensions of former EU bureaucrats.

«You only get to be a child once, so don't spend it worrying too much about the future.»

The Tory - blue booty was included in a lengthy speech from the throne Wednesday by Gov. Gen. David Johnston that spent almost as much time congratulating the Harper government on past achievements as laying out future priorities.

He doesn't spend too much time thinking about the future or the past, and is obsessed with moving forward from task to task.

Before you spend too much time worrying about a severance agreement in your own future, be aware that cooperation clauses for mid-level employees are rare.

Financial planner Scott D. Hedgcock says that «when planning for a more secure future there are two inputs that are indispensable:» how much money you have and how much money you spend.

The silver lining is that beginning this week, the entire complicated system of itemized deductions will only benefit 5 % of tax filers which should make it much easier to eliminate them entirely in the future, (to be replaced with much better targeted spending programs in my parallel rational Congress delusion), since 95 % of Americans won't benefit from itemized deductions.

For decades, elected officials jeopardized the region's future by spending too much money on things that haven't translated into growth, then delaying payments.

So the really dominant driving characteristic is how much do I regret having spent $ 7 on return shipping in the past, and is it really worth it to risk paying that money again in the future?

And the NDP's hints about raising the corporate income tax are unlikely to be enough to offset future austerity, much less finance any new spending that they have in mind.

You shouldn't spend your time attempting to predict how much a piece of art will cost in the future or worrying about any kind of financial return.

As much as i want to buy buy buy, I think I'm going to buy with caution for this might be the beginning of a greater bear market and if i spend all my capital now i may not have any more for any other potential deals to come in the future.

Uncertainty about labour market reforms, the adequacy of pension systems and future economic conditions may also be discouraging consumers from spending, especially in Germany where these issues have received much publicity.

I'm a huge saver (80 - 90 %) of every paycheck as an engineer but with this I can invest it as I see fit without regulations and not have any higher taxes to deal with later on (where I agree with you, taxes will be much higher in the future than it is now to address our spending problem... and more importantly our growing debt problem).

Most investors spend their time thinking about the short term as it's much easier than contemplating the future.

But Marvel clearly has its eyes on the future, and this entry spends much of its time on the new players.

For Brown, if the United States could commit itself to refusing to imitate the «evil deeds» of the terrorists, if the U.S. would eschew the violence that has marked its post-World War II foreign policy, if the U.S. could abandon its «faith in redemptive violence,» if the U.S. could spend as much money on a peace academy as it does on the service academies... well, there would be some hope for a peaceful future.

I would much rather spend my days on a sinking ship with those who love me, knowing that no matter what the future holds, I tried my hardest to lift people up and not slam them down.

For this reason I have realized this: a chimpanzee does not understand math (regardless of how many hours I spent trying to teach them this) because of it's anatomy, yet I do understand math because of my anatomy (and education of course), I as a mere mortal (unlike yourself) know that my faculties must be somehow limited and that there are concepts that no matter how much I try to use my retarded brain I will never understand them because I don't have the god lobe in the ole brain like you do, none the less I keep on thinkin» in a finite fashion hoping that my future children might have a little more range than I since they too will be a «tarded snapshot in a timeline of cognitive evolution.

After all, that money can be much better spent on future education... like a university or college fund;)

Since we don't have to spend much on em both......... They are better than Nothing, and could possibly turn out to be great signings in the future.....

Likewise, one reason L.A. can pay that much money is because they've spent the past 30 years paying for success and taking risks and refusing to rebuild, which in turn made them the most valuable and visible team in the NBA, with massive revenue streams that allow them to overpay for future success, guaranteeing more value.

Louisiana Tech and SMU spent much of Wednesday inking their futures, then went out on Wednesday evening and put on one of the strangest displays of football you can imagine.

If Wenger is guaranteed the revenue from the Champions League, it not only gives him more money to spend, but it will also make it much easier to convince world - class players that they are going to club with great prospects of more trophies in the very near future.

Why so much effort and so much money spent to enter the top 4 in every single year?Just to be embarrased everytime by anyone?I mean, is not worth it if you don't take advantage of that and go for the glory.Everything is on vain, just the pleasure of showing up?This team doesn't have a future, it is just a mediocre one, get use it.Glory times are past, class players are gone... what is left?Just a name chasing the shadows of the past.And all this sorrow atmosphere has only one man responsible - Arsene Wenger.He must go for the good of the club, he is just a stone dragging the team backward or keeping it still.Just go Arsena, don't embarras yourself and the beautiful times you lived here.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

never waste CAPITAL LETTERS on an article about Chambers at this juncture... I still can't believe that no one from management has ever explained why such a frugal club spent so much money on him in the first place... we haggle for months and years with clubs for players who could have a monumental impact on the very future of our club but somehow we found $ 16 million for someone who couldn't regularly crack a Southampton lineup (very fishy)... don't get me wrong, I like what he showed at times last season in Middlesbourogh but from the handful of games I watched him play I still have some serious questions about his consistency as a back - line player in the EPL; as such he should prove himself on loan for another season, making sure that he goes to a team that wants him in the starting 11... bottom line, let's not get bogged down with the semantics of peripheral players and focus on the real task at hand = figure out who the hell is going to be our starting 11 for the foreseeable future, which means getting contracts signed, getting rid of a lot of deadwood and bringing in talented players into the positions which truly need upgrading... the rest is just unnecessary noise

Although Liverpool's assistant manager Ronnie Moran would declare, with audacity laced with the traditional Liverpool helping of sour grapes, that the best team had lost, United fans left Old Trafford that day with a sense that the future might not be so grim as we'd spent much of the season thinking.

Now, we ponder their futures after a campaign in which Chalobah made precisely zero Serie A starts for Napoli, as Bamford failed to find the back of the net for either Crystal Palace or Norwich, and as Kalas, promoted though he may have been with Middlesbrough, spent much of his time at the Riverside as an unused substitute.

16 to 18 is also the time when children really need to become much more future oriented, when you're projecting what they're going to spend out in the future, this is the time when you're putting your college plans together, sit down and talk with them about what is going to cost for them to be away for 4 years.

Though she spends much of her time exploring the past, she is just as passionate about the future.

Much of my time without them is spent studying for a qualification which will be a stepping stone to a different career - in the future.

«You use a diaper bag for such a short amount of time that it seems silly to spend so much money on a bag that you're not going to use as a regular purse in the future.»

Now is the time to look to a future free of short - term spending rounds for children's services provision and to look to modernising the way we spend money, and not how much we spend.

May says there'll be «proposals in advance of next year's spending review» to «enable the NHS to plan much more effectively and efficiently in the future».

Spending so much time looking at the world's future, it's no surprise Niblett is so ambitious when it comes to his own organisation's plans.

«We are spending so much in the education sector because education is critical to every society, it is an area where no society can afford to fail, the education sector is important because it is through education that a society can meet up with the present and safeguard the future»

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that ACA's discretionary spending provisions, if fully funded by future appropriations acts, would result in appropriations of almost $ 100 billion over the period FY2012 - FY 2021.11 However, much of that funding — about $ 85 billion — would be for three programs that were in existence prior to, and whose funding was reauthorized by, ACA; namely, the National Health Service Corps, the federal health centers program, and the Indian Health Service (IHS).

The package which, the Tories say, will be financed by spending restraint in 2009/10 * communicates (1) a concern for potentially unemployed young graduates and (2) also the party's belief that Britain's economic future depends upon much more investment in tech - based industries.

At the same meeting in which Aquila announced her exit, the board voted to reverse long - standing policy and in future consider credible complaints about campaign spending misdeeds even if those tips are anonymous — an issue of much discussion at last month's Moreland hearing.

It's now been replaced with a chart showing how much future surplus there could be, if spending growth is limited to 2 % or less.

We made a point of trying to get away from the campaign to cover the choice: the 6 and 10 did a series on big issues, from airports to defence spending to social care, that weren't getting much play in the campaign; Newsnight interrogated the future of the NHS; Andrew Neil's series of Daily Politics debates analysed policy, department by department over two weeks; and, online, from Reality Check to constituency profiles, we scrutinised the detail.

The Balls approach always envisaged a commitment to remaining within the government's future spending totals — as Gordon Brown's main adviser in the 1990's, he had been the leading champion of matching government plans — but this was for much later in the parliament, once Tory economic credibility had been destroyed.

«Our estimate can guide policy makers and the oil industry in determining not only how much should be spent on restoration efforts for the Deepwater spill, but also how much should be invested to protect against damages that could result from future oil spills,» said Boyle.

If seawater contains less carbonate ions due to ocean acidification in the future, the swimming snails have to spend too much energy to build their houses — it remain thin and porous or brittle.

Whether these unicellular multi-talented organisms will be able to fulfil their functions in the future, depends on how much extra energy they have to spend on calcification — and how their competitors in the food web react to ocean change.

So much of our mental energies are spent ruminating over the past or projecting into the future when luscious life lessons are being offered in the now.

Human beings spend so much time worrying about what happened in the past or what's going to happen in the future, and we forget to focus on the only time there is — right now.

If you typically go through your days choosing food in the moment and spend a lot of time and energy worrying about those choices — past, present, and future — then meal planning just frees up SO much time and space.