Sentences with phrase «much harm when»

In my clinical and technical investigations of the activators for inducing mineral metabolism, I have continually found evidence indicating that cod liver oil contains products that are very seriously toxic to humans and other land animals and can do much harm when given in large doses, even only as large as frequently advocated.»

Not exact matches

Letting everyone know what you ate for breakfast, lunch, and dinner along with how many times you walked your dog today will do much more harm than good when it comes to likeability.

When does too much content do more harm than good?

«When taking vows as elders at Coral Ridge, each individual commits before God to strive for the purity, peace, and unity of the church,» Coral Ridge stated to CT. «We are saddened that these two elders failed in their vows by withholding this information regarding our former senior pastor, which has since caused many families and churches much harm.»

Exodus 21: 22 - 25» When people who are fighting injure a pregnant woman so that there is a miscarriage, (i.e. an «involuntary abortion») and yet no further harm follows, the one responsible shall be fined what the woman's husband demands, paying as much as the judges determine.

Its difficult to harm Religion with this when Religions have done so much, in so many ways, for so long to kill itself off.

Just because the Holy Spirit directs and leads one in a direction that is not the norm, just as Paul clearly related regarding his actions on this subject, does not make it a rule for everyone else, and much harm is done when people decide that everyone else must follow the unique road that the Holy Spirit has directed them down and declaring to be a sin what is clearly not a sin.

When Rachel Carson dared to suggest in Silent Spring that synthetic pesticides did more harm than good, her book was dismissed as so much hogwash.

When Barth scholars have a fierce debate about who gets Barth right, it can not do as much harm.

He asked what was wrong with such works, when everyone knew that the papal tyranny did so much harm to the Christian world and especially to «this illustrious nation of Germany.»

If Wenger does finally take the plunge and augment the likes of Walcott — who to my mind is over paid and over valued, when in actuality he does more harm than good most of the time — with a new striker, how much will he spend?

I just don't even knoe what goes through Wenger's head.A player keeps playing and causing harm to the team and yet is allowed to play every week when there are far better players on the bench.Xhaka is so bad and I wish he never signed for Arsenal in the first place.If we're going to talk about potential I think Niles has more potential than Xhaka and is already the much better player.

When parents and the community are ignorant of nutrition as so many people are, the child's health will suffer, precisely because our government allows food manufacturers to produce, market and sell entirely too much food that harms human health.

Before that time, certainly you can use a high chair to separate your child from hurting another child or harming property, but they are much less capable of understanding that what they did had a consequence and you will be frustrated when they don't seem to «get it» even after many time outs.

Even though science has not yet been able to demonstrate much harm to children from consumption of pesticides, why take a chance when you don't have to.

Your argument begs the question of how much the US would be harmed by not taxing non-resident wealthy people, when almost every other country seems to feel that there isn't sufficient benefit to initiate the practice.

When mere seconds of storm warning could mean the difference between harm or safety, two researchers with ties to Western University in London, Canada, have developed a tornado - prediction method they say could buy as much as 20 minutes additional warning time.

When mere seconds of storm warning could mean the difference between harm or safety, two researchers with Western University ties have developed a tornado - prediction method they say could buy as much as 20 minutes more warning time.

Consider this: a 100 calorie snack - pack of Oreo cookies may only be 100 calories but it clearly leaves something to be desired when it comes to nourishing your body and is most definitely causing more harm than good, robbing your body of much needed nutrients and leaving behind substances that your body can not even process.

In this episode, we're talking about how to lose your menopause belly; including the truth behind the common misconception that menopause causes your metabolism to drop, why cardio exercises actually do more harm than good, how to maintain proper nutrition without dieting, why we need to change our mindset when it comes to menopause, and much more!

We included survey results when we talked to the FDA about how much the proposed regulations would harm Lyme patients.

Not much when you consider the slipperiness of DE and it's bioelectrical properties that Shepard toxic metals through our biology with little harm.

When you go through the science, yeah, it's a perfectly natural response to get absolutely angry at the terrible science that had been done and how the public health community took it and converted it into these messages that could do so much harm.

Of course, it is nice to feel needed in a relationship, but it does more harm than good when you depend on your relationship far too much to validate your self or sense of worth.

Therefore, try to be flexible more so when you see that it will not harm you so much to accommodate someone else.

We can talk a lot about the harm caused by certain studios when it comes to reshoots and edited versions of films, but when it doesn't concern huge movies where those stories will easily make headlines, it generally shows how much of a collaborative process filmmaking is and how there are producers who know a thing or two about development.

Logical consequences, as discussed in the last article, are ways in which adults structure learning opportunities for children when natural consequences pose too much harm.

However, when it came to Pathways, the primary driving force for us was a much more specific one — a concern for the welfare of our students who were being harmed by an often nonfunctional credit - transfer system — and we were determined to remove that harm no matter how difficult that might be.

When you consider all the ways in which American public education harms the lives of children black and brown as well as denies them brighter futures, it is critical that reformers put as much energy into transforming the systems as some are doing in taking down Confederate statues in public parks.

(Don't worry too much, as a little water in the crankcase does no harm — it's generated all the time as a byproduct of combustion and normally just boils off when the engine gets hot.)

As much as it sucks to wait, releasing a poorly executed version of the game would likely do more harm than delaying it and doing things correctly; especially true when you consider there are already 20 million players, many of which will turn to the smartphone version as well.

I hope that this book gets the very wide audience it deserves because what it has to say is of relevance to virtually all of us as individuals, and takes on even great significance when one adds in the fact that (according to well - documented and much repeated research, first performed by Stanley Milgram in the 1960s) about two - thirds of the general population will follow the orders of somebody in authority, even if it is to inflict significant harm on others.

When it comes to minimizing the harm from Apple's new in - app purchase rules, Look Inside is a much smarter solution than Cloud Reader.

It doesn't take long, but that time spent can mean the difference between a positive loan experience that helps your financial situation and an awful experience that harms your credit, costs you far too much money, and leaves you in much worse shape then when you started.

(That's a good time for it, when you have little money to invest and can't do yourself much harm.)

When that happens, as much as you probably want to discipline your dog right then, you should know that it will do more harm than good.

Small pets are appealing for many reasons: they often fit comfortably in smaller homes including apartments, their size makes feeding them less expensive, and when it comes to their potential to harm — this especially applies to alternative pets — they are much safer to interact with (as long as they aren't extremely venomous).

Be careful when tipping the trap so that you don't harm they cat by jostling her too much.

Perhaps when we get a new White House a real creative, honest, caring effort will begin that might hopefully do some good if it doesn't have to spend too much time undoing the harm that has been done.

The notion to act in a way that avoids harm, or at least minimizes risk as much as possible, when faced with risk and uncertainty has been around a long time and is rather fundamental to many of our normal human patterns.

But as to when, that's not as important as «I've got to do all I can today to help ensure it doesn't rise very much» or cause drought and death, or the many many other harms.

Although he spends much time discussing how societal changes — the moving of persons and property into harm's way — make us increasingly vulnerable to hurricanes, he fails to seriously consider the idea that when you add global warming to said societal changes, the result could be a double whammy.

So for San Francisco and Oakland to build a claim on harms from future sea level rise is a stretch when there is so much uncertainty as to what will happen, the argument goes.

When asked, «How much do you think global warming with harm people in the United States?»

When asked, «How much do you think global warming will harm plant and animal species?»

When asked, «How much do you think global warming will harm future generations of people?»

I don't know if Mr Ridgway has grandchildren, but suppose that he does and consider what might happen if they look into the history of climate change in fifty years time when everyone has seen how much harm it has done and is continuing to do.

So much for your «beyond a shadow of doubt»... which I frankly think is a bit extreme when the idea is to * prevent * harm from happening in the first place.

How much pushback have you demonstrated against the CAGW belief when confronted by facts that do not support your views: e.g. the fact there is a lack of evidence demonstrating that GHG emissions will do more harm than good.

They tell us that making sure corporations are held accountable when their actions harm consumers, employees, or communities (70 %) should be a much higher priority for the civil justice system than limiting the amount of compensation that juries can award for pain and suffering.»