A much higher birth rate of 2.1 births is needed just to keep the population from declining.
Not exact matches
The psychological impact inside marriage of excessively limiting se.x could be quite harmful, and the health impact of accidental pregnancy by using imprecise methods for occassional se.x are
much higher than the affects of any form of
birth control.
@Chad, «This may be because
birth rates in religious societies are
much higher.»
This may be because
birth rates in religious societies are
much higher.
Some evidence for this exists in the extremely low
birth rate among more secularized Jews, their
high intermarriage rate, and the fact that they are
much more likely to convert to other religions than are religious Jews.
So
much in Christianity had me seeing these kinds of things only in the light of demons and evil and satan, that when I started reading and understanding more (when I was in junior
high school) and comprehending the concept of the
birth - life - death - rebirth cycles, and how there needs to be death and decay for their to be
birth and growth... it really made a huge impression on how I saw the world.
From
birth through
high school through college through a 12 - year major - league career, he got to stay in the same area of the country, a luxury that most Americans never have,
much less baseball players.
Cuba, a poorer country than the United States but with substantially
higher breastfeeding rates and
much better breastfeeding support, has an under - 5 mortality rate of 7 children per 1,000 live
births (better than the United -LSB-...]
In Canada, where the
birth rate is not
much higher than Germany at 1.6
births per woman, I think we escape some of what Germany is going through and yet feel some other parts of it more heavily.
Home
birth, mama is a nurse for maternity home health company, faced opposition but support from immediate family, had some formative and transformative experiences that were precursors for a deciding on a home
birth, devoured
much research on positive
births and home
births and empowered herself with it, lots of visualisation, hand s and knees swaying, followed the urge to moan and it felt good, bath, natural endorphins produce a feeling as «
high as a kite», felt her own baby, skin to skin bonding, ready to have another one!
Perinatal mortality rates for hospital
births of low risk women are similar to outcomes of planned homebirth in general, but the maternal morbidity at planned hospital
births is
much higher.
I expect the data to be partial, and very slickly presented to put the best spin on it all [something like «90 + % of homebirths are uncomplicated», not that a certain percentage,
much higher than hospital
births, result in death or morbidity].
Oh yea, and they kill babies at a
much higher RATE compared to comparable risk hospital
birth.
It's infant mortality that the US suffers in, not perinatal / neonatal (eg; very shortly after
birth)-- and surprise surprise, it's pretty
much for the same reason we have a
high maternal mortality — in the US, poor people can't / don't have access to skilled health care until it's an emergency, because then they can't refuse you.
While it remains unclear how
much of that lock down was requested by the Carters, or if it was the hospital acting in what it considered the best interests of it's patients, what is clear is that regular protocol goes out the window when you're dealing with such a
high - profile pregnancy and
birth.
Add to that the fact that we had a ridiculously
high rate of females born (so
much easier for our situation), and well, we've been counting our lucky stars about farm
births for years.
I have been through A LOT as a mom including pregnancy,
birth,
high - risk pregnancy (preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome), adoption (international & private domestic), special needs, working from home, running my own businesses while raising my kiddos, international travel with kids and SO
much more!!!
Needless to say, the number of women giving
birth in Canada is
much higher than the number of people deployed by the Canadian Forces.
The perinatal (around the time of
birth) death rate of babies born in nonhospital settings is
much higher than for babies born in a hospital, even though their mothers are supposedly lower - risk.
At any point in our parenting journeys, we can reflect back on our early days as mothers or fathers and glow in the knowledge of how
much we have changed since that... first positive pregnancy test... or our oldest child's
birth... or a seemingly endless night of breastfeeding... or our struggle with learning how to do positive discipline... or the first day of school... or our daughter's first basketball win... or our son's first crush... or our child's
high school graduation... or our daughter's wedding... or our son's first child...
The risks to the mother and baby are
much higher in a cesarean
birth than in a vaginal
birth, Maiman said.
Ina may also has a
much higher death rate than hospital
birth.
When compared with data on planned home
birth in other industrialised countries, the perinatal death rate in Australia was
much higher.
In moms who had given
birth before, the transfer rate was
much lower and the baby death rate was not statistically
higher than in the hospital.
Pregnancy (while normally a normal process) actually poses
much greater risk to the average woman's health than any birth control pill because estrogen and progesterone levels are MUCH higher during pregnancy than when any woman is on
much greater risk to the average woman's health than any
birth control pill because estrogen and progesterone levels are
MUCH higher during pregnancy than when any woman is on
MUCH higher during pregnancy than when any woman is on BC.
The U.S. has considered many factors, such as advanced maternal age, more reproductive technology, and
higher rates of premature
births for its
high mortality rate, but the rate is simply
much too
high.
Families who choose homebirth have a
much higher chance of enjoying a natural, physiologic
birth, and a
much lower chance of experiencing unnecessary medical procedures, with outcomes that are just as safe, compared to healthy mothers and babies birthing in hospital.
While this is more of a concern during pregnancy, since
high levels of vitamin A can lead to
birth defects, a breastfeeding mother may also be concerned about consuming too
much vitamin A and passing it to the baby through her breast milk.
Mother's milk after a premature
birth is
much higher in certain nutrients, and studies show superior growth and head circumference in low - weight infants fed milk from preterm baby mothers.
Before the advent of ovulation - stimulating drugs, triplets were quite rare (approximately 1 in 8000
births) and
higher - order
births much rarer still.
When some kind of breastfeeding attempt is made within the first six hours after
birth, prolactin levels are
much higher than when the first attempts are three days later.
We could not have asked for a more positive
birth experience and know that
much of this is because of
High Country Doula's support to our family.
A Newfoundland study found that premature babies and babies weighing less than 2.5 kg at
birth were at
much higher risk of neonatal seizures.
Miller and colleagues [34] use the term «too
much, too soon» to refer to the over-medicalization of
birth following the rapid increase in the use of hospital as the place of
birth in
high - and middle - income countries, which they claim, might offset recent gains from improvements in maternal and perinatal health.
1) The US has a
higher rate of premature
birth, perhaps for genetic reasons, perhaps partly due to poverty, but unfortunately the world's current obstetrical technology can't do
much to prevent prematurity.
The U.S. spends twice as
much per
birth than any other country in the world, yet has the second - worst newborn mortality rate and one of the
highest rates of maternal death during childbirth.
This baby needs access to immediate
high level care at
birth, as your risk of complications is
much higher than someone 20 years younger.
What I seem to gather is this: 1) The absolute risk of death from home
birth is LOW, which is why homebirth advocates say that this study proves homebirth is «safe», however: 2) Compared to HOSPITAL
births, the rate of death for homebirth is
MUCH higher, and 3) The midwives reporting did so on a voluntary basis, so this isn't a study that is worth very much any
MUCH higher, and 3) The midwives reporting did so on a voluntary basis, so this isn't a study that is worth very
much any
much anyway.
Yet, when I analyzed all of the studies that the Midwives» Alliance of North America (MANA) says comprise the best evidence for the safety of home
birth, I found that every study that looked at nonhospital
birth in the United States (and many of the studies that looked at other countries, as well) reported
much higher death rates for babies when compared to similar hospital
births.
My daughter has always been a
much more
high strung child which has been evident from
birth and there's no amount of breastfeeding that would have «fixed» her anxiety problems.
Multiple pregnancy babies have a
much higher risk of being born prematurely and having a low
birth weights.
It was a
high intervention
birth, but they tried to stick to my birthplane as
much as possible.
And the women who are
high - risk are
much less likely to choose home
birth in the first place.
The problem is when this devolves into the claims that 1) homebirth in the US is an acceptable alternative to hospital
birth and 2) the main reason for poor outcomes in hospitals is opposition to natural
birth (and the inevitable c - section)-- all the while completely ignoring
much more real problems such as the huge disparity of outcomes by race; the
high prevalence of pre-existing health conditions in the general population; and access to healthcare.
I find it ironic that mainstream medical professionals would spend so
much time critiquing and vilifying home
birth when the VAST MAJORITY OF
BIRTHS IN AMERICA HAPPEN IN AMERICAN HOSPITALS and when AMERICA HAS AMONG THE
HIGHEST MATERNAL MORTALITY RATES OF ANY COUNTRY IN THE INDUSTRIALIZED WORLD.
While clomiphene is a first - line treatment used to induce ovulation in women with PCOS, it has downsides — namely that in a significant number of women it does not lead to improved ovulation or live
births, and if it does induce ovulation, it frequently results in pregnancies with multiples who face
much higher negative outcomes including death.
And certain
birth defects had
much higher associations with particular cancers.
The amount of oxygen in a galaxy is determined primarily by three factors: how
much oxygen comes from large stars that end their lives violently in supernova explosions — a ubiquitous phenomenon in the early Universe, when the rate of stellar
births was dramatically
higher than the rate in the Universe today; how
much of that oxygen gets ejected from the galaxy by so - called «super winds,» which propel oxygen and other interstellar gases out of galaxies at hundreds of thousands of miles per hour; and how
much pristine gas enters the galaxy from the intergalactic medium, which doesn't contain
much oxygen.
It will investigate why galaxies produced stars so
much faster in the past; 10 billion years ago, the rate of star
birth was 10 times
higher.
Anything that alters your hormone levels — like changing to a new hormonal
birth control pill (that increases your estrogen levels) or too
much stress (
high cortisol) is a risk factor.