Sentences with phrase «much higher cash flow»

You should be able to get a nice house with a much higher cash flow than this one.

Not exact matches

Most companies experience cash flow challenges within the first few years of operation and, for a large percentage of those businesses, the obstacle of high operating expenses and compounding debt proves to be too much -LSB-...]

Most companies experience cash flow challenges within the first few years of operation and, for a large percentage of those businesses, the obstacle of high operating expenses and compounding debt proves to be too much to handle.

For example, if you compared 2007 to 2011, when DuPont had cash flow of $ 5.8 billion, you would get a much higher return on investment, something like 13 % after taxes.

Industries such as software, on the other hand, allow for much higher price to cash flow ratios because they have very low capital requirements.

Throughout the past decade, there is a high correlation between how expensive GE's stock is versus current cash flows and how much stock the company repurchases.

The company maintains a fairly high payout ratio as it returns much of its cash flows to shareholders in the form of dividends.

Most value stocks have low price - to - earnings (P / E) ratios, high dividend yields, low price - to - cash - flow ratios, and stocks with a market value (generally, the stock price) that is lower than the book value (how much the company's net assets are worth).

It has a much higher dividend yield of 4.2 %, and, like UGI, it has delivered positive free cash flow for three consecutive years.

There are three reasons why STORE benefits so much from this high percentage of retained cash flow.

We do nt sell high and buy low like some teams do — Even Chelsea is much better at managing their cash flow in the last few years than us.

Companies in defensive industries, such as utilities, pipelines, and telecommunications, have stable and predictable earnings and cash flows, and thus can support much higher payouts than cyclical companies.

The other positive is that Tom and Mary recognize that using capital gains and return of capital to cover cash flow needs is usually much more tax beneficial than trying to boost income by having higher investment yields.

Closed end income fund prices are still well below the levels they commanded when interest rates were much higher, yet they provide the same cash flow as before the financial crises.

Much as we like the flexibility of dividends, our cash flow is more than sufficient, and can handle a higher payout.

While this isn't a bad thing, it's much harder to earn a high return via capital appreciation versus regular cash flow payments.

It is invested primarily in the credit market, not so much in government bonds because government bond yields are so low, but we're looking for absolute returns even if interest rates go up, so some of the portfolio, a significant piece of it actually, is floating rate, so if interest rates go up, you just get higher cash flows, which will support higher returns, and the rest of the portfolio is in relatively short maturity bonds, which will have some price volatility and if there's bad market conditions, will have temporary losses, so the goal is to offer something that is absolute returns.

As well, look at free cash flow, how much debt a company is carrying — a debt - to - EBITDA ratio of three times is getting high, says Gibbs — and how they're spending their money.

It looked dumb on current performance, but if you look at investing as a business asking what level of surplus cash flows the underlying investments will throw off, it was an easy choice, because bonds were offering a much higher future yield than stocks.

Outerwall has historically produced high returns on capital, and it's a business that doesn't need much tangible capital to produce huge amounts of cash flow (an attractive business), but it has been run similar to companies that get purchased by private equity firms — leverage up the balance sheet, issue a dividend (or buyout some shareholders), thus keeping very little equity «at risk».

Shares issuance will dilute current investors while too much debt means higher rates and less distributable cash flow after interest expense.

Sellers sometimes act improperly by misstating the true revenues of the business to get the highest possible price by misleading the buyer into thinking that the business yields much greater cash flow than is the truth.

I may need the cash flow later in which case it will be much higher when properties are paid off, or I will sell the properties and bring back the cash from the equity.

Note in reality I am likely underselling the «cash flow» of the class A property because to produce 1.3 X on an assumed much higher purchase price it would produce better than the same «cash flow» as the C property (otherwise it would not have achieved 1.3 X).

Furthermore, there are certain areas of my market where I know taxes are much higher and therefore even the 1 % rule doesn't work... it usually has to be a 1.5 % - 2 % property to offset the high taxes and still cash flow.

The Ca properties will likely make more over the short term and even perhaps over the long term, but their price volatility is much higher than the Midwest properties and the annual cash flow much more modest based either FMV or historical cost.

However, we invest in Waterloo, Iowa which is a low to middle income area and our strategy is based on the highest cash flow possible, but we know our properties are not going to appreciate much.

You'll also have a much better chance for higher appreciation, which is the real wealth builder, not the $ 100 / mo cash flow.

Prescott Capital invests on behalf of high - net - worth individuals who emphasize cash flow as much as, or more than, price appreciation, says Susan Stupin, a managing director at Prescott Capital.

Some of the specific tweaks I did to achieve much higher than expected results (note that these do come with risks): — Instead of 30 yr fixed, I went with 5 yr ARM loans allowing minimum payment: This allowed me to get financing at 2.5 % and improving cash flow quite a bit.

These are considered the bread and butter for rentals, with higher cash flow and CAP rates, but normally much lower appreciation.