Sentences with phrase «much higher expense ratios»

Some of the ETFs that Stash features have much higher expense ratios.

Those A / B / C shares generally all come with much higher expense ratios than the comparable (and in many case identical) «no - load» shares available.

Actively managed funds have much higher expense ratios because of the increased work required of the fund's manager.

Simply enter in values for the grey boxes below, and see for yourself how much those high expense ratios and AUM fees hurt you:

Not exact matches

While CFRA incorporates a fund's expense ratio in our forward - looking rating of more than 1,300 ETFs, we think the performance gap between two ETFs will often be much greater than the high - profile fee differential.

Car insurance that costs too much, bank account fees, home - energy wasters or mutual funds with high expense ratios.

1) Just so to cut the high expense ratio, is it advisable for a new investor to go for DIRECT plans without having much of the knowledge on markets and MF?

More passively managed portfolios may have much lower expense ratios, but this often corresponds to lower returns as these funds are primarily oriented toward long - term growth rather than generating the highest yield.

If you look at the SSgA funds at their website, the expense ratios are much higher, ranging from 0.18 % to 1.26 %.

al.), unfortunately their management expense ratios are much higher than their apparent skills.

Their funds also incurred an average trading expense ratio (TER) of 0.11 %, although the ABC Canadian small cap fund had a much higher trading expense (1.05 %).

While 0.29 % is not a high expense ratio, it was much higher than a similar fund the Vanguard Large Cap Index Fund (VLACX) that has an expense ratio of 0.18 %.

In other words, a low expense ratio should be given a MUCH higher weighting in the decision making process than past performance.

If you have a high expense ratio on a fund with a smaller balance, it might not affect your overall total returns all that much.

If you are working for a small company, the expense ratios on the funds in the 401k account are likely much higher than you can get with a similar IRA.

But despite more recent restructuring, expenses are still 25 % higher today... fortunately offset by a steady increase in Saga Furs» turnover (i.e. auction fees) ratio to 12.1 % (vs. 10.2 % in 2010, I've already highlighted this counter-cyclical feature of the business model), so last year's EUR 2.05 EPS ended up much the same as 2010.

Active mutual fund shareholders are charged much higher annual management expense ratios across both the active and passive portions of their portfolios.

This is because you pay a higher management expense ratio across all fund assets, but only a much smaller portion of the investment portfolio is really being managed actively.

Also, for the same reasons, putting money in a high - expense ratio fund will eat at your future earnings at a much higher rate than what a «low» figure of 1,24 % suggests.

OK, all things equal except Expense Ratio, and yes, a higher ratio reduces return, but not by much Ratio, and yes, a higher ratio reduces return, but not by much ratio reduces return, but not by much (app.

The expense ratios were much higher.